| Literature DB >> 29946801 |
Feiran Li1,2,3, Wei Xie4, Qianqian Yuan1,2,3, Hao Luo2, Peishun Li2, Tao Chen1,3, Xueming Zhao1,3, Zhiwen Wang5,6, Hongwu Ma7.
Abstract
Marine ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) play an important role in the global nitrogen cycle by obtaining energy for biomass production from CO2 via oxidation of ammonium. The isolation of Candidatus "Nitrosopumilus maritimus" strain SCM1, which represents the globally distributed AOA in the ocean, provided an opportunity for uncovering the contributions of those AOA to carbon and nitrogen cycles in ocean. Although several ammonia oxidation pathways have been proposed for SCM1, little is known about its ATP production efficiency. Here, based on the published genome of Nitrosopumilus maritimus SCM1, a genome-scale metabolic model named NmrFL413 was reconstructed. Based on the model NmrFL413, the estimated ATP/NH4+ yield (0.149-0.276 ATP/NH4+) is tenfold lower than the calculated theoretical yield of the proposed ammonia oxidation pathways in marine AOA (1.5-1.75 ATP/NH4+), indicating a low energy production efficiency of SCM1. Our model also suggested the minor contribution of marine AOA to carbon cycle comparing with their significant contribution to nitrogen cycle in the ocean.Entities:
Keywords: Ammonia oxidation pathway; Ammonia-oxidizing archaea; Energy production efficiency; Genome-scale metabolic model; Nitrosopumilus maritimus SCM1
Year: 2018 PMID: 29946801 PMCID: PMC6038301 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-018-0635-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Fig. 1The workflow of genome-scale metabolic model reconstruction of strain SCM1
Fig. 2The Thaumarchaeal HP/HB cycle for carbon fixation. Four missing reactions in the strain SCM1 draft model were marked in red-dashed line. Enzymes numbered in brackets are: 1, acetyl-CoA carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.2); 2, malonyl-CoA reductase (NADPH) (EC 1.2.1.75); 3, malonic semialdehyde reductase (NADPH) (EC 1.1.1.-); 4, 3-hydroxypropionyl-CoA synthetase (ADP-forming) (EC 6.2.1.-); 5, 3-hydroxypropionyl-CoA dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.116); 6, acryloyl-CoA reductase (EC 1.3.1.84); 7, propionyl-CoA carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.3); 8, methylmalonyl-CoA epimerase (EC 5.1.99.1); 9, methylmalonyl-CoA mutase (EC 5.4.99.2); 10, succinyl-CoA reductase (NADPH) (EC 1.2.1.76); 11, succinic semialdehyde reductase (NADPH) (EC 1.1.1-); 12, 4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA synthetase (ADP-forming) (EC 6.2.1.-); 13, 4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydratase (EC 4.2.1.20); 14, crotonyl-CoA hydratase [(S)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA forming] (EC 4.2.1.17) 15, (S)-3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase (NAD+) (EC 1.1.1.35); 16, acetoacetyl-CoA β-ketothiolase (EC 2.3.1.9)
Fig. 3The arginine biosynthesis pathways in the strain SCM1 model. Genes for the first reaction (EC 2.3.1.1) in the normal arginine synthesis pathway (up part) is missing in the genome and thus a gap exists in the pathway. The existence of gene Nmar_1288 encoding ArgX that catalyzes the first step of the LysW-mediated arginine pathway (bottom part) suggests that strain SCM1 uses this pathway for arginine synthesis. Glu: l-glutamate; acglu: N-acetyl-l-glutamate; acg5p: N-acetyl-l-glutamate 5-phosphate; acg5sa: N-acetyl-l-glutamate 5-semialdehyde; acorn: N-acetylornithine; orn: l-ornithine; citr: l-citrulline; argsuc: N-(l-Arginino) succinate; arg: l-arginine; lysW-glu: LysW-l-glutamate; lysW-g5p: LysW-l-glutamyl 5-phosphate; lysW-g5sa: LysW-l-glutamate 5-semialdehyde; lysW-orn: LysW-l-ornithine
Reaction equations for the three AOA ammonia oxidation pathways
| Equation ID | Catalyst | Equation | Pathway 1a | Pathway 2b | Pathway 3c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trans_NH4 | Ammonium transporter | NH4+ → NH3 + Hout+ | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| AMO | Ammonia monooxygenase | NH3 + O2 + QH2 → NH2OH + H2O + Q | Yes | Yes | |
| AMO-NO | Ammonia monooxygenase | NH3 + O2 + 2 NO + H2O → NH2OH + 2 HNO2 | Yes | ||
| HAO | Hydroxylamine oxidoreductase | NH2OH + H2O + 4 PCYm → HNO2 + 4 PCYme + 4 Hout+ | Yes | Yes | |
| CuP460 | CuP460 | NH2OH + 2 H2O + 5 PCYm + NO → 2 HNO2 + 5 PCYme + 5 Hout+ | Yes | ||
| QH2-Synt | Quinone reductase(QRED) | 2 PCYme + Q + 2 Hout+ → QH2 + 2 PCYm | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| NIR | Nitrite reductase | QH2 + Hin+ + 2 PCY → Q + 3 Hout+ + 2 PCYe | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N2O-spon | Abiotic reaction | NO + NH2OH → N2O + H2O + Hout+ | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Cytbc1 | Cytochrome bc1; COMPLEX III | QH2 + Hin+ + 2 PCY → Q + 3 Hout+ + 2 PCYe | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Cytaa3 | Cytochrome aa3; COMPLEX IV | 2 PCYe + 0.5 O2 + 4 Hin+ → 2 Hout+ + H2O + 2 PCY | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ATP-Synt | ATP synthase | 4 Hout+ + ADP + Pi → 3 Hin+ + ATP + H2O | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| NADH-Synt | NADH reductase; COMPLEX I | QH2 + NAD + Hout+→ NADH + 3 Hin+ + Q | Yes | Yes | Yes |
aWalker et al. (2010), b Schleper and Nicol (2010), c (Kozlowski et al. 2016)
Fig. 4Three proposed ammonia oxidation pathways in AOA. Pathway 1 was proposed by Walker et al. In this pathway, ammonia is oxidized to hydroxylamine by the membrane enzyme complex AMO/CuMMO (Walker et al. 2010). Subsequently, hydroxylamine is oxidized to nitrite in the periplasm by a heme-rich hydroxylamine oxidoreductase (CuHAO) complex. Four electrons from this oxidation are transferred to the quinone pool. Two electrons from the reduced quinone pool return to AMO (marked by red) and are required to initiate ammonia oxidation. The remaining two electrons enter the electron transport chain composed of pcy protein to generate the proton motive force (PMF) necessary for ATP synthesis and NADH synthesis. In Pathway 2 (Schleper and Nicol 2010; Stahl and de la Torre 2012), NO is speculated functioning as a redox shuttle to deliver electrons to the AMO (marked by green) since measurable amounts of NO are produced during ammonia oxidation. In pathway 3, iterative production and consumption of NO is involved in conversion of hydroxylamine to nitrite facilitated by a proposed novel copper enzyme capable of performing known P460 activity (CuP460) (Kozlowski et al. 2016). N2O was formed abiotically from NO by interaction with media components or with debris in killed cell. AMO/CuMMO, ammonia monooxygenase; CuHAO, hydroxylamine dehydrogenase; NIR, Cu-containing NO-forming nitrite reductase; pcy, plastocyanin; Q/QH2, quinone/quinol pool
Combined reactions for each ammonia oxidation pathway showing the number of ATP and NADH produced by the oxidation of one ammonium
| Pathway | Combined reactiona | Theoretical yield (mol mol−1) |
|---|---|---|
| Pathway 1 | NH4+ + 1.5 O2 + 0.5 Hin+ + 1.5 ADP + 1.5 Pi → 1.5 ATP + 2.5 H2O + HNO2 | 1.5 ATP/NH4+ |
| NH4+ + O2 + NAD + 0.5 ADP + 0.5 Pi → 0.5 ATP + 0.5 H2O + HNO2 + 1.5 Hin+ + NADH | NADH + 0.5 ATP/NH4+ | |
| Pathway 2 | NH4+ + 1.5 O2 + 0.75 Hin+ + 1.75 ADP + 1.75 Pi → 1.75 ATP + 2.75 H2O + HNO2 | 1.75 ATP/NH4+ |
| NH4+ + O2 + NAD + 0.75 ADP + 0.75 Pi → 0.75ATP + 0.75 H2O + HNO2 + 1.25 Hin+ + NADH | NADH + 0.75 ATP/NH4+ | |
| Pathway 3 | NH4+ + 1.5O2 + 0.625 Hin+ + 1.625 ADP + 1.625 Pi → 1.625 ATP + 2.625 H2O + HNO2 | 1.625 ATP/NH4+ |
| NH4+ + O2 + NAD + 0.625 ADP + 0.625 Pi → 0.625 ATP + 0.625 H2O + HNO2 + 1.375 Hin+ + NADH | NADH + 0.625 ATP/NH4+ |
aProtons generated by the oxidation of NH4+ can be used to produce ATP and NADH. The two combined reactions represent two situations when ATP or NADH production was maximized, respectively
Basic features of the reconstructed genome-scale metabolic model NmrFL413 of Nitrosopumilus maritimus SCM1
| Model feature | Number |
|---|---|
| Reactions | 765 |
| Gene associated | 564 |
| No gene association | 201 |
| Transport reactions | 34 |
| Metabolites | 825 |
| Included ORFs (% of total ORFs) | 413 (20.7) |
Fig. 5Outline of the reconstructed strain SCM1 metabolic network NmrFL413
Experimentally measured and computationally calculated yield values for strain SCM1 and other ammonia-oxidizing organisms
| Strains | Original experimental data | Biomass/NH4+ yield (gDW mol−1) | Biomass/NH4+ yield (mol mol−1)c | ATP/Biomass yield (mol g−1) | ATP/NH4+ yield (mol mol−1) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.49 × 1013 cells mol−1 NH4+ | 0.698 | 1:37 | 0.213d | 0.149 | Löscher et al. ( | |
| 5 × 1013 cells mol−1 NH4+ | 1.00a | 1:26 | 0.213d | 0.213 | Konneke et al. ( | |
| 1.3 gDW mol−1 NH4+ | 1.3 | 1:20 | 0.213d | 0.276 | Konneke et al. ( | |
| 0.027 h−1/26.5 mmol NH4+ g DW−1 h−1 | 1.02 | 1:25 | 0.213d | 0.217 | Martens-Habbena et al. ( | |
| Strian PS0 | 5.31 × 1013 cells mol−1 NH4+ | 1.06a | 1:25 | 0.213d | 0.226 | Qin et al. ( |
| Strian HCA1 | 5.50 × 1013 cells mol−1 NH4+ | 1.10a | 1:24 | 0.213d | 0.234 | Qin et al. ( |
| 6 × 1013 cells mol−1 NH4+ | 1.20a | 1:22 | 0.213d | 0.256 | Bayer et al. ( | |
| 0.171 ATP/NH4+ (6% proton circulating in the chain) | 0.718b | 1:36 | 0.238e | 0.171 | Poughon et al. ( |
a20 fg dry weight cell−1 for strain SCM1 was used to convert the cell abundance figures to dry cell weights. This value was also used in the calculation for strains PS0 HCA1 D3C and NF5 due to their similar cell shapes and sizes (Qin et al. 2014)
b194 fg dry weight cell−1 for N. europaea was used to convert the cell numbers to dry cell weights. The value for N. europaea was calculated based on the reported values of 120 fg protein dry weight cell−1 and 62% protein content (Martens-Habbena et al. 2009; Poughon et al. 2001)
cCalculated from the biomass/NH4+ yield based on a molecular weight of 26 g mol−1 for biomass (Tijhuis et al. 1993)
dCalculated from metabolic network model analysis
eFrom the reference (Mangiapia and Scott 2016)
Fig. 6Comparison of theoretical and estimated ATP/NH4+ yield based on Table 4