C Timire1,2,3, K C Takarinda1,2,4, C Sandy3, C Zishiri1, A M V Kumar2,5, A D Harries2,6. 1. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), Harare, Zimbabwe. 2. The Union, Paris, France. 3. Ministry of Health and Child Care, National TB Control Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe. 4. Ministry of Health and Child Care, National AIDS Programme, Harare, Zimbabwe. 5. The Union, South-East Asia Office, New Delhi, India. 6. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abstract
Setting: Retreatment tuberculosis (TB) patients in Zimbabwe are investigated using microscopy, Xpert® MTB/RIF and culture + drug susceptibility testing (CDST). TB CARE I, a sputum transport service using motorcycles, was introduced to transport specimens between peripheral health facilities and laboratories, including National Reference Laboratories (NRLs). Objectives: To compare access to CDST and treatment outcomes among retreatment TB patients in facilities with and those without TB CARE I support. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Results: There were 187 patients from TB CARE I-supported facilities and 116 from non-TB CARE I facilities, with no difference in demographic characteristics. Altogether, specimens from 22 (12%) retreatment TB patients had successful CDST from TB CARE I facilities, which was not statistically significantly different from non-supported facilities (n = 14, 12%; P = 0.94). The median number of days from sputum collection to receipt at the NRL was lower in TB CARE I facilities than in non-supported facilities (median 6, interquartile range [IQR] 4-8 vs. median 8, IQR 6-13.5; P = 0.000). Favourable treatment outcomes were documented in 65% of patients under TB CARE I, significantly more than among patients in non-supported facilities (47%, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The process of sputum specimen collection for CDST was not different between TB CARE I and non-TB CARE I-supported health facilities, apart from a slightly shorter time. Ways to improve the current system are discussed.
Setting: Retreatment tuberculosis (TB) patients in Zimbabwe are investigated using microscopy, Xpert® MTB/RIF and culture + drug susceptibility testing (CDST). TB CARE I, a sputum transport service using motorcycles, was introduced to transport specimens between peripheral health facilities and laboratories, including National Reference Laboratories (NRLs). Objectives: To compare access to CDST and treatment outcomes among retreatment TB patients in facilities with and those without TB CARE I support. Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Results: There were 187 patients from TB CARE I-supported facilities and 116 from non-TB CARE I facilities, with no difference in demographic characteristics. Altogether, specimens from 22 (12%) retreatment TB patients had successful CDST from TB CARE I facilities, which was not statistically significantly different from non-supported facilities (n = 14, 12%; P = 0.94). The median number of days from sputum collection to receipt at the NRL was lower in TB CARE I facilities than in non-supported facilities (median 6, interquartile range [IQR] 4-8 vs. median 8, IQR 6-13.5; P = 0.000). Favourable treatment outcomes were documented in 65% of patients under TB CARE I, significantly more than among patients in non-supported facilities (47%, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The process of sputum specimen collection for CDST was not different between TB CARE I and non-TB CARE I-supported health facilities, apart from a slightly shorter time. Ways to improve the current system are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Zimbabwe; culture and drug susceptibility testing; retreatment TB; sputum specimen transportation; treatment outcomes
Authors: A D Harries; J Michongwe; T E Nyirenda; J R Kemp; S B Squire; A R Ramsay; P Godfrey-Faussett; F M Salaniponi Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: M B Tharu; A D Harries; S Goel; S Srivastava; A M V Kumar; M Adhikari; B Shrestha; B Maharjan; H Khadka Journal: Public Health Action Date: 2014-03-21
Authors: Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: K Charambira; S Ade; A D Harries; R T Ncube; C Zishiri; C Sandy; H Mutunzi; K Takarinda; P Owiti; P Mafaune; P Chonzi Journal: Public Health Action Date: 2016-06-21
Authors: Grant Theron; Lynn Zijenah; Duncan Chanda; Petra Clowes; Andrea Rachow; Maia Lesosky; Wilbert Bara; Stanley Mungofa; Madhukar Pai; Michael Hoelscher; David Dowdy; Alex Pym; Peter Mwaba; Peter Mason; Jonny Peter; Keertan Dheda Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Y F van der Heijden; F Karim; G Mufamadi; L Zako; T Chinappa; B E Shepherd; F Maruri; M-Y S Moosa; T R Sterling; A S Pym Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Catharina C Boehme; Pamela Nabeta; Doris Hillemann; Mark P Nicol; Shubhada Shenai; Fiorella Krapp; Jenny Allen; Rasim Tahirli; Robert Blakemore; Roxana Rustomjee; Ana Milovic; Martin Jones; Sean M O'Brien; David H Persing; Sabine Ruesch-Gerdes; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Camilla Rodrigues; David Alland; Mark D Perkins Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yingda L Xie; Soumitesh Chakravorty; Derek T Armstrong; Sandra L Hall; Laura E Via; Taeksun Song; Xing Yuan; Xiaoying Mo; Hong Zhu; Peng Xu; Qian Gao; Myungsun Lee; Jongseok Lee; Laura E Smith; Ray Y Chen; Joon Sung Joh; YoungSoo Cho; Xin Liu; Xianglin Ruan; Lili Liang; Nila Dharan; Sang-Nae Cho; Clifton E Barry; Jerrold J Ellner; Susan E Dorman; David Alland Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Helen S Cox; Slindile Mbhele; Neisha Mohess; Andrew Whitelaw; Odelia Muller; Widaad Zemanay; Francesca Little; Virginia Azevedo; John Simpson; Catharina C Boehme; Mark P Nicol Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 11.069