Yingda L Xie1, Soumitesh Chakravorty1, Derek T Armstrong1, Sandra L Hall1, Laura E Via1, Taeksun Song1, Xing Yuan1, Xiaoying Mo1, Hong Zhu1, Peng Xu1, Qian Gao1, Myungsun Lee1, Jongseok Lee1, Laura E Smith1, Ray Y Chen1, Joon Sung Joh1, YoungSoo Cho1, Xin Liu1, Xianglin Ruan1, Lili Liang1, Nila Dharan1, Sang-Nae Cho1, Clifton E Barry1, Jerrold J Ellner1, Susan E Dorman1, David Alland1. 1. From the Tuberculosis Research Section, Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (Y.L.X., L.E.V., R.Y.C., C.E.B.), and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (D.T.A., S.E.D.) - both in Maryland; the Center for Emerging and Re-Emerging Pathogens, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark (S.C., L.E.S., N.D., D.A.); Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston (S.L.H., J.J.E.); the International Tuberculosis Research Center, Changwon (T.S., M.L., J.L., S.-N.C.), and the National Medical Center (J.S.J.), Seoul Metropolitan Seobuk Hospital (Y.C.), and the Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University (S.-N.C.), Seoul - all in South Korea; Henan Provincial Chest Hospital (X.Y., X.M., X.L., X.R., L.L.) and Sino-U.S. Tuberculosis Research Collaboration (H.Z.), Zhengzhou, and Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology of Ministries of Education and Health, School of Basic Medical Science, Fudan University, Shanghai (P.X., Q.G.) - all in China; and the Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine and Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa (C.E.B.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable drugs are the backbone of treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, and resistance to these drugs defines extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. We assessed the accuracy of an automated, cartridge-based molecular assay for the detection, directly from sputum specimens, of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with resistance to fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and isoniazid. METHODS: We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study to compare the investigational assay against phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing and DNA sequencing among adults in China and South Korea who had symptoms of tuberculosis. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay and sputum culture were performed. M. tuberculosis isolates underwent phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing and DNA sequencing of the genes katG, gyrA, gyrB, and rrs and of the eis and inhA promoter regions. RESULTS: Among the 308 participants who were culture-positive for M. tuberculosis, when phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing was used as the reference standard, the sensitivities of the investigational assay for detecting resistance were 83.3% for isoniazid (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.1 to 88.5), 88.4% for ofloxacin (95% CI, 80.2 to 94.1), 87.6% for moxifloxacin at a critical concentration of 0.5 μg per milliliter (95% CI, 79.0 to 93.7), 96.2% for moxifloxacin at a critical concentration of 2.0 μg per milliliter (95% CI, 87.0 to 99.5), 71.4% for kanamycin (95% CI, 56.7 to 83.4), and 70.7% for amikacin (95% CI, 54.5 to 83.9). The specificity of the assay for the detection of phenotypic resistance was 94.3% or greater for all drugs except moxifloxacin at a critical concentration of 2.0 μg per milliliter (specificity, 84.0% [95% CI, 78.9 to 88.3]). When DNA sequencing was used as the reference standard, the sensitivities of the investigational assay for detecting mutations associated with resistance were 98.1% for isoniazid (95% CI, 94.4 to 99.6), 95.8% for fluoroquinolones (95% CI, 89.6 to 98.8), 92.7% for kanamycin (95% CI, 80.1 to 98.5), and 96.8% for amikacin (95% CI, 83.3 to 99.9), and the specificity for all drugs was 99.6% (95% CI, 97.9 to 100) or greater. CONCLUSIONS: This investigational assay accurately detected M. tuberculosis mutations associated with resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides and holds promise as a rapid point-of-care test to guide therapeutic decisions for patients with tuberculosis. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02251327 .).
BACKGROUND:Fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable drugs are the backbone of treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, and resistance to these drugs defines extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. We assessed the accuracy of an automated, cartridge-based molecular assay for the detection, directly from sputum specimens, of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with resistance to fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and isoniazid. METHODS: We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study to compare the investigational assay against phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing and DNA sequencing among adults in China and South Korea who had symptoms of tuberculosis. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay and sputum culture were performed. M. tuberculosis isolates underwent phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing and DNA sequencing of the genes katG, gyrA, gyrB, and rrs and of the eis and inhA promoter regions. RESULTS: Among the 308 participants who were culture-positive for M. tuberculosis, when phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing was used as the reference standard, the sensitivities of the investigational assay for detecting resistance were 83.3% for isoniazid (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.1 to 88.5), 88.4% for ofloxacin (95% CI, 80.2 to 94.1), 87.6% for moxifloxacin at a critical concentration of 0.5 μg per milliliter (95% CI, 79.0 to 93.7), 96.2% for moxifloxacin at a critical concentration of 2.0 μg per milliliter (95% CI, 87.0 to 99.5), 71.4% for kanamycin (95% CI, 56.7 to 83.4), and 70.7% for amikacin (95% CI, 54.5 to 83.9). The specificity of the assay for the detection of phenotypic resistance was 94.3% or greater for all drugs except moxifloxacin at a critical concentration of 2.0 μg per milliliter (specificity, 84.0% [95% CI, 78.9 to 88.3]). When DNA sequencing was used as the reference standard, the sensitivities of the investigational assay for detecting mutations associated with resistance were 98.1% for isoniazid (95% CI, 94.4 to 99.6), 95.8% for fluoroquinolones (95% CI, 89.6 to 98.8), 92.7% for kanamycin (95% CI, 80.1 to 98.5), and 96.8% for amikacin (95% CI, 83.3 to 99.9), and the specificity for all drugs was 99.6% (95% CI, 97.9 to 100) or greater. CONCLUSIONS: This investigational assay accurately detected M. tuberculosis mutations associated with resistance to isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides and holds promise as a rapid point-of-care test to guide therapeutic decisions for patients with tuberculosis. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and the Ministry of Science and Technology of China; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02251327 .).
Authors: Manzour Hernando Hazbón; Michael Brimacombe; Miriam Bobadilla del Valle; Magali Cavatore; Marta Inírida Guerrero; Mandira Varma-Basil; Helen Billman-Jacobe; Caroline Lavender; Janet Fyfe; Lourdes García-García; Clara Inés León; Mridula Bose; Fernando Chaves; Megan Murray; Kathleen D Eisenach; José Sifuentes-Osornio; M Donald Cave; Alfredo Ponce de León; David Alland Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Frederick A Sirgel; Robin M Warren; Elizabeth M Streicher; Thomas C Victor; Paul D van Helden; Erik C Böttger Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Sophia B Georghiou; Marisa Magana; Richard S Garfein; Donald G Catanzaro; Antonino Catanzaro; Timothy C Rodwell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Suzanne M Hingley-Wilson; Rosalyn Casey; David Connell; Samuel Bremang; Jason T Evans; Peter M Hawkey; Grace E Smith; Annette Jepson; Stuart Philip; Onn Min Kon; Ajit Lalvani Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Bertin C Bisimwa; Jean B Nachega; Robin M Warren; Grant Theron; John Z Metcalfe; Maunank Shah; Andreas H Diacon; Nadia A Sam-Agudu; Marcel Yotebieng; André N H Bulabula; Patrick D M C Katoto; Jean-Paul Chirambiza; Rosette Nyota; Freddy M Birembano; Eric M Musafiri; Sifa Byadunia; Esto Bahizire; Michel K Kaswa; Steven Callens; Zacharie M Kashongwe Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Emily A Kendall; Shelly Malhotra; Sarah Cook-Scalise; David W Dowdy; Claudia M Denkinger Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: A M W Efsen; A Schultze; R F Miller; A Panteleev; A Skrahin; D N Podlekareva; J M Miro; E Girardi; H Furrer; M H Losso; J Toibaro; J A Caylà; A Mocroft; J D Lundgren; F A Post; O Kirk Journal: J Infect Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 6.072
Authors: Alexander V Kukhtin; Ryan Norville; Arial Bueno; Peter Qu; Nicole Parrish; Megan Murray; Darrell P Chandler; Rebecca C Holmberg; Christopher G Cooney Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Keira A Cohen; Katharine E Stott; Vanisha Munsamy; Abigail L Manson; Ashlee M Earl; Alexander S Pym Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 5.191