Literature DB >> 29944891

Automated detection of electroencephalography artifacts in human, rodent and canine subjects using machine learning.

Joshua Levitt1, Adam Nitenson2, Suguru Koyama3, Lonne Heijmans1, James Curry4, Jason T Ross4, Steven Kamerling4, Carl Y Saab5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electroencephalography (EEG) invariably contains extra-cranial artifacts that are commonly dealt with based on qualitative and subjective criteria. Failure to account for EEG artifacts compromises data interpretation. NEW
METHOD: We have developed a quantitative and automated support vector machine (SVM)-based algorithm to accurately classify artifactual EEG epochs in awake rodent, canine and humans subjects. An embodiment of this method also enables the determination of 'eyes open/closed' states in human subjects.
RESULTS: The levels of SVM accuracy for artifact classification in humans, Sprague Dawley rats and beagle dogs were 94.17%, 83.68%, and 85.37%, respectively, whereas 'eyes open/closed' states in humans were labeled with 88.60% accuracy. Each of these results was significantly higher than chance. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS: Other existing methods, like those dependent on Independent Component Analysis, have not been tested in non-human subjects, and require full EEG montages, instead of only single channels, as this method does.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that our EEG artifact detection algorithm provides a valid and practical solution to a common problem in the quantitative analysis and assessment of EEG in pre-clinical research settings across evolutionary spectra.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact detection; Electroencephalography; Machine learning; SVM

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29944891     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  5 in total

Review 1.  Deconstructing biomarkers for chronic pain: context- and hypothesis-dependent biomarker types in relation to chronic pain.

Authors:  Diane Reckziegel; Etienne Vachon-Presseau; Bogdan Petre; Thomas J Schnitzer; Marwan N Baliki; A Vania Apkarian
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  An Electroencephalography Bioassay for Preclinical Testing of Analgesic Efficacy.

Authors:  Suguru Koyama; Brian W LeBlanc; Kelsey A Smith; Catherine Roach; Joshua Levitt; Muhammad M Edhi; Mai Michishita; Takayuki Komatsu; Okishi Mashita; Aki Tanikawa; Satoru Yoshikawa; Carl Y Saab
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Time-dynamic pulse modulation of spinal cord stimulation reduces mechanical hypersensitivity and spontaneous pain in rats.

Authors:  Muhammad M Edhi; Lonne Heijmans; Kevin N Vanent; Kiernan Bloye; Amanda Baanante; Ki-Soo Jeong; Jason Leung; Changfang Zhu; Rosana Esteller; Carl Y Saab
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  An Unsupervised Multichannel Artifact Detection Method for Sleep EEG Based on Riemannian Geometry.

Authors:  Elizaveta Saifutdinova; Marco Congedo; Daniela Dudysova; Lenka Lhotska; Jana Koprivova; Vaclav Gerla
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Pain phenotypes classified by machine learning using electroencephalography features.

Authors:  Joshua Levitt; Muhammad M Edhi; Ryan V Thorpe; Jason W Leung; Mai Michishita; Suguru Koyama; Satoru Yoshikawa; Keith A Scarfo; Alexios G Carayannopoulos; Wendy Gu; Kyle H Srivastava; Bryan A Clark; Rosana Esteller; David A Borton; Stephanie R Jones; Carl Y Saab
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 6.556

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.