Literature DB >> 29944183

A Longitudinal Examination of Decisions to Ride and Decline Rides with Drinking Drivers.

Brittney A Hultgren1, Rob Turrisi2,3, Kimberly A Mallett2, Sarah Ackerman2, Mary E Larimer1, Denis McCarthy4, Eduardo Romano5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Riding with a drinking driver (RWDD) is a serious concern that leads to numerous preventable deaths every year. There is a significant gap in research on empirically tested predictors of RWDD that could be implemented in prevention efforts. College students are in need of such prevention efforts, as they have some of the highest rates of alcohol-related crash fatalities and may engage in RWDD more than their noncollege peers. This study utilized behavioral decision-making approach to examine predictors of RWDD and declining a ride from a drinking driver (Decline) in older college students.
METHODS: Students (n = 791) in their third year of college were enrolled from 3 large and diverse universities. Psychosocial (e.g., expectancies, norms) and decision-making variables (willingness to RWDD and intentions to use alternatives) were assessed in the fall of their third year. One year later, RWDD and Decline behaviors were assessed. Zero-inflated Poisson analyses were used to assess how decision-making variables predicted RWDD and Decline behavior. Associations between psychosocial and decision-making variables were also assessed.
RESULTS: Thirteen percent of students reported RWDD and ~28% reported Decline behavior. Willingness to RWDD and typical weekly drinking were both associated with increases in RWDD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.58 and 1.40, respectively), whereas intentions to use alternatives, sex, and ethnicity were not associated with RWDD. Only weekly drinking was associated with Decline, with an increase in drinking associated with increased Decline (OR = 1.48). All psychosocial variables were significantly associated with the decision-making variables except positive expectancies.
CONCLUSIONS: Results provide evidence that willingness to RWDD is a predictor of future RWDD, even if students intend to use safe alternatives. Future research is needed to better understand decision-making factors that influence Decline. Results also suggest prevention and interventions efforts, such as brief motivational intervention, Parent-Based Interventions, and normative feedback interventions could be adapted to reduce RWDD.
Copyright © 2018 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  College Students; Decision-Making; Riding with a Drinking Driver

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29944183      PMCID: PMC6120778          DOI: 10.1111/acer.13818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  24 in total

1.  Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.

Authors:  B Borsari; K B Carey
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-08

2.  Ethnic differences in driving after drinking and riding with drinking drivers among adolescents.

Authors:  Samantha Walker; Andrew J Treno; Joel W Grube; John M Light
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006.

Authors:  Mary E Larimer; Jessica M Cronce
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Indicated prevention for incoming freshmen: personalized normative feedback and high-risk drinking.

Authors:  Melissa A Lewis; Clayton Neighbors; Laura Oster-Aaland; Benjamin S Kirkeby; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 5.  Reason and reaction: the utility of a dual-focus, dual-processing perspective on promotion and prevention of adolescent health risk behaviour.

Authors:  Frederick X Gibbons; Amy E Houlihan; Meg Gerrard
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2008-11-20

6.  Trends in alcohol-related traffic risk behaviors among college students.

Authors:  Kenneth H Beck; Sarah J Kasperski; Kimberly M Caldeira; Kathryn B Vincent; Kevin E O'Grady; Amelia M Arria
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  It's all fun and games...or is it? Collegiate sporting events and celebratory drinking.

Authors:  Dan J Neal; Dawn E Sugarman; John T P Hustad; Catherine M Caska; Kate B Carey
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2005-03

8.  Passengers' decisions to ride with a driver under the influence of either alcohol or cannabis.

Authors:  Jennifer Cartwright; Mark Asbridge
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  Do students use contextual protective behaviors to reduce alcohol-related sexual risk? Examination of a dual-process decision-making model.

Authors:  Nichole M Scaglione; Brittney A Hultgren; Racheal Reavy; Kimberly A Mallett; Rob Turrisi; Michael J Cleveland; Nichole M Sell
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2015-09

Review 10.  Individual-focused approaches to the prevention of college student drinking.

Authors:  Jessica M Cronce; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2011
View more
  2 in total

1.  Driving/riding after alcohol and marijuana use among young adults: Is residing with family protective?

Authors:  Kaylin M Greene; Amanda M Hedstrom; Samuel T Murphy
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  Alcohol-related deaths among young passengers: An analysis of national alcohol-related fatal crashes.

Authors:  Eduardo Romano; James Fell; Kaigang Li; Bruce G Simons-Morton; Federico E Vaca
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2021-10-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.