| Literature DB >> 29941982 |
Shari L Lydy1, Mauricio S Lascano2,3,4, Josselyn E Garcia-Perez3,5, Amanda J Williams-Newkirk6,7, Mario J Grijalva2,3.
Abstract
The seroprevalence and epidemiology of Bartonella bacilliformis infection in the Andean highlands of Ecuador is largely unknown. We conducted a sero-epidemiologic survey of 319 healthy children aged 1-15 years living in six rural, mountain communities in Loja Province, Ecuador. Blood was collected by finger stick onto filter paper and dried, and the eluted sera analyzed for antibodies to B. bacilliformis by rPap31 ELISA. Demographic, entomologic, and household variables were assessed to investigate associated risk factors for antibody seropositivity to B. bacilliformis. Seroprevalence of 28% was found among children in the study communities. Increased risk of seropositivity was associated with the presence of lumber piles near houses. Decreased risk of seropositivity was observed with the presence of animal waste and incremental 100 meter increases in elevation. Although investigation of clinical cases of Carrion's disease was not within the scope of this study, our serology data suggest that infection of children with B. bacilliformis is prevalent in this region of Ecuador and is largely unrecognized and undiagnosed. This study highlights the need to further investigate the prevalence, pathogenesis, epidemiology, and disease impact of this pathogen in Ecuador.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29941982 PMCID: PMC6018114 DOI: 10.1038/s41426-018-0110-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect ISSN: 2222-1751 Impact factor: 7.163
Overall demographics and individual responses to entomological questions of surveyed children in the six communities in Loja province, Ecuador (EC)
|
| % | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 166 | 52.2 |
| Female | 153 | 47.8 |
| Age categories, years | ||
| 1–5 | 112 | 35.1 |
| 6–10 | 119 | 37.3 |
| 11–15 | 88 | 27.6 |
| Travela | ||
| None or within Loja province | 256 | 82.6 |
| Non-endemic provinces in EC | 17 | 5.5 |
| Endemic provinces in EC or Peru | 26 | 8.4 |
| Destination not stated | 11 | 3.5 |
| Recognize sand fliesb | ||
| Yes | 168 | 57.1 |
| No | 126 | 42.9 |
| Bitten by sand flies | ||
| Yes | 261 | 85.9 |
| No | 43 | 14.1 |
aIn Ecuador, non-endemic provinces included El Oro, Azuay, Sucumbios, and Pichincha (no reported Carrion’s disease). Endemic provinces in EC included Manabi and Guayas (verruga peruana) and Piura, Peru (Oroya fever)
bSand flies were identified from pictures
cMeters above sea level (MASL)
Overall B. bacilliformis seropositivity in children by community and age group
| Antibody positive by age group | Antibody negative by age group | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community | 1–5 | 6–10 | 11–15 | Total | (%)a | 1–5 | 6–10 | 11–15 | Total | (%)a |
| Vega del Carmen | 14b | 7 | 4 | 25 | 51% | 8 | 11 | 5 | 24 | 49% |
| Chirimoyos | 6 | 9 | 5 | 20 | 48% | 8 | 9 | 5 | 22 | 52% |
| Santa Rosa | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 42% | 6 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 58% |
| Usaime | 6 | 6 | 8 | 20 | 36% | 12 | 14 | 9 | 35 | 64% |
| Galapagos | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 12% | 19 | 17 | 17 | 53 | 88% |
| Jacapo | 3 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 8% | 22 | 31 | 27 | 80 | 92% |
| Total # of children per age group in all communities | 37 | 32 | 21 | 90 | 75 | 87 | 67 | 229 | ||
| Total % Ab+ or Ab- children in all communitiesc | 33% | 27% | 24% | 28% | 67% | 73% | 76% | 82% | ||
Antibody was measured as IgG by rPap31 ELISA
aPercentage of antibody-positive or antibody-negative children per community
bNumber of children in each age category
cPercentage of total antibody-positive or negative children by age group
Fig. 1Age curve of seropositivity showing the percentage of children at each age from total children in all six study communities in Loja Province compared to the percentage of seropositive children at each age. The left axis corresponds to the line graph denoting the percentage of children at each age. The right axis corresponds to the bar graph denoting the percentage of children at each age that are seropositive
Comparison of seropositive children between communities by post hoc pairwise testing using Fisher’s exact tests of independence
| Community (Ab+) | JP (7) | NGL (7) | NVC (25) | NVS (20) | SS (11) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CY (20)a | < 0.0001b | 0.0009 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| JP (7) | 1.0 | 0.0001 | 0.0018 | 0.002 | |
| NGL (7) | 0.0001 | 0.0299 | 0.0219 | ||
| NVC (25) | 0.843 | 1.0 | |||
| NVS (20) | 1.0 |
CY Chirimoyes, JP Jacapo, NGL Galapagos, NVC Vega del Carmen, NVS Usaime, SS Santa Rosa
aNumber of seropositive children
bp < 0.0033 is significant at 95% CI (0.05 significance level/15 pairwise comparisons)
Household characteristics in the six study communities in Loja province
| Households |
| % |
|---|---|---|
| Type of roof | ||
| Tile | 106 | 92.2 |
| Concrete | 4 | 3.5 |
| Zinc | 3 | 2.6 |
| Asbestos | 1 | 0.9 |
| Palm Straw | 1 | 0.9 |
| Type of walls | ||
| Adobe | 110 | 86.1 |
| Brick/concrete | 17 | 13.0 |
| Bamboo/paper lined | 1 | 0.9 |
| Type of floor | ||
| Dirt | 83 | 72.2 |
| Concrete/brick | 25 | 21.7 |
| Rough wood | 6 | 5.2 |
| Bamboo | 1 | 0.9 |
| Peridomestic animals | ||
| Dogs | 102 | 89.5 |
| Cats | 72 | 63.2 |
| Birds/Livestock | ||
| Chickens | 110 | 95.6 |
| Pigs/swine | 95 | 83.3 |
| Guinea pigs | 51 | 44.3 |
| Sheep/goats | 31 | 27.1 |
| Wild animals in/near house | ||
| Mice | 97 | 84.3 |
| Rats | 100 | 88.7 |
| Opossums/foxes | 69 | 60.5 |
| Materials near house | ||
| Firewood | 87 | 76.3 |
| Trash | 79 | 68.7 |
| Rocks/bricks | 39 | 34.2 |
| Lumber pile | 16 | 14.0 |
| Organic matter | ||
| Animal manure | 42 | 36.8 |
| Crop waste | 37 | 32.2 |
| Vegetation | ||
| Bushes | 93 | 81.2 |
| Weeds | 83 | 72.8 |
| Fruit trees | 51 | 44.3 |
| Agave | 1 | 0.9 |
Univariate associations between B. bacilliformis seropositivity and select variables
| Variable | Seropositive | Seronegative | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognize sand flies | ||||
| Yes | 56 (64.4) | 113 (54.3) | 1.52 (0.88–2.63) | 0.122 |
| No | 31 (35.6) | 95 (45.7) | ||
| Type of walls | ||||
| Adobe | 73 (91.2) | 171 (82.2) | 2.26 (0.74–6.87) | 0.113 |
| Brick/concrete | 7 (8.8) | 37 (17.8) | ||
| Guinea pigs | ||||
| Yes | 40 (49.4) | 78 (37.5) | 1.63 (0.87–3.02) | 0.115 |
| No | 41 (50.6) | 130 (62.5) | ||
| Sheep/goats | ||||
| Yes | 28 (34.2) | 42 (20.1) | 2.06 (1.06–4.01) | 0.027a |
| No | 54 (65.8) | 167 (79.9) | ||
| Rats | ||||
| Yes | 67 (81.7) | 185 (89.4) | 0.53 (0.24–1.19) | 0.122 |
| No | 15 (18.3) | 22 (10.6) | ||
| Animal waste | ||||
| Yes | 23 (28.0) | 85 (40.7) | 0.57 (0.30–1.09) | 0.071 |
| No | 59 (72.0) | 124 (59.3) | ||
| Lumber pile | ||||
| Yes | 15 (18.3) | 21 (10.0) | 2.00 (0.99–4.05) | 0.052a |
| No | 67 (81.7) | 188 (90.0) | ||
| Weeds | ||||
| Yes | 48 (59.3) | 161 (77.0) | 0.43 (0.22–0.55) | 0.012a |
| No | 33 (40.7) | 48 (23.0) | ||
| Elevation (m)b,c | – | – | 0.79 (0.70–0.89) | <0.001a |
| Mean | 1326 ( | 1448 ( | – | <0.001a |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
aStatistically significant at p < 0.05. Odds ratio > 1.0 denotes increased risk
bAs a variable, elevation is continuous and thus has no entries for number or % of seropositive/seronegative. However, a univariate odds ratio using logistic regression could still be calculated. The odds ratio is 0.79 for each 100 m of elevation and decreases for each 100 m increase in elevation
cBecause elevation is continuous, we also calculated and compared the mean elevation for seropositives and seronegatives by Student’s t-test
Multivariate model 2 using logistic regression to determine associations between B. bacilliformis seropositivity including statistically significant variables from univariate analysis
| Variablea | Odds Ratio (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Animal waste | 0.47 (0.24, 0.91) | < 0.026 |
| Lumber pile | 2.47 (1.08, 5.63) | < 0.032 |
| Elevation (per 100 m)c | 0.76 (0.66, 0.87) | < 0.001 |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
aAnimal waste was also included for biological importance as a sand fly breeding site and larval food source
bStatistically significant at p < 0.05
cThe odds ratio is 0.76 for each 100 m of elevation; the odds ratio decreases for each 100 m increase in elevation. This is consistent with the univariate analysis
Fig. 2Map of Ecuador (inset) with Loja province shaded.
The six study communities are identified in the large map of Loja province. Also shown is the provincial capital city of Loja and major communities of Catacocha (Paltas County) and Cariamanga (Calvas County). WGS84 coordinates for each community are as follows: Chirimoyos (04.12972°S, 79.5456°W), Vega del Carmen (04.10610°S, 79.59012°W), Jacapo (04.36621°S, 79.4162°W), Usaime (04.46035°S, 79.54414°W), Santa Rosa (04.3960°S, 79.41861°W, and Galapagos (04.35233°S, 79.4344°W)