| Literature DB >> 27627803 |
Cláudia Gomes1, Noemí Palma1, Maria J Pons2, Ariel Magallón-Tejada1, Isabel Sandoval3, Carmen Tinco-Valdez2,4, Carlos Gutarra3, Juana Del Valle-Mendoza2,4, Joaquim Ruiz1, Mayumi Matsuoka5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bartonella bacilliformis is the causative agent of Carrion's disease, a neglected illness with mortality rates of 40-85% in the absence of treatment. The lack of a diagnostic technique to overcome misdiagnosis and treat asymptomatic carriers is of note. This study aimed to identify new B. bacilliformis antigenic candidates that could lead to a new diagnostic tool able to be implemented in endemic rural areas. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27627803 PMCID: PMC5023120 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Bacterial strains and plasmids.
| Description | Source or reference | |
|---|---|---|
| Strains | ||
| CIP 57.20 –NCTC12136 | Institute Pasteur | |
| E. coli TOP10 | Host strain for cloning | Invitrogen |
| E. coli BL21Star (DE3) | Host strain for gene expression | Invitrogen |
| Plasmids | ||
| pCR4-TOPO | TA-cloning vector | Invitrogen |
| pET100D/TOPO | Expression vector | Invitrogen |
| pGroEL | pET100D/TOPO containing GroEL | This study |
| pPap31 | pET100D/TOPO containing Pap31 | This study |
| pSCS-α | pET100D/TOPO containing SCS-α | This study |
| pSCS-β | pET100D/TOPO containing SCS-β | This study |
SCS-α: succinyl-CoA synthetase subunit α
SCS-β: succinyl-CoA synthetase subunit β.
Primers used in this study.
| Sequence (5’ → 3’) | Ref | |
|---|---|---|
| TTGATAAGCGTGAGGTCGGAGG | [ | |
| GCAACCACACATAGTAAGCCTAA | [ | |
| ATGTCTGCCTAGAAATCAATCATAGGCC | [ | |
| GroEL F | This study | |
| GroEL R | TTAGAAATCCATTCCGCCCATTCCGCC | This study |
| Pap31 F | This study | |
| Pap31 R | TCAGAATTTGTAAGCAACACCAACGCG | This study |
| SCS α F | This study | |
| SCS α R | CTAACCCTTCAAGACTGAAACC | This study |
| SCS β F | This study | |
| SCS β R | TTAAGCTCCTTTTACGGCTGC | This study |
* CACC at the 5’ end is a sequence added to allow pET directional cloning.
General data about the study population (n = 198).
| Tunal | Guayaquiles | Los Ranchos | Mayland | Huancabamba | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 94) | (n = 25) | (n = 44) | (n = 10) | (n = 25) | ||
| n (%) | 94 (47.5) | 25 (12.6) | 44 (22.2) | 10 (5.1) | 25 (12.6) | 198 (100) |
| Mean age (min–max) | 39.3 (1–94) | 34.2 (6–67) | 38.6 (5–77) | 30.2 (6–73) | 30.2 (9–68) | 36.9 (1–94) |
| Male | 31 (33) | 8 (32) | 17 (38.6) | 4 (40) | 16 (64) | 76 (38.4) |
| Female | 63 (67) | 17 (68) | 27 (61.4) | 6 (60) | 9 (36) | 122 (61.6) |
| CD symptoms | 23 (24.5) | 17 (68) | 14 (31.8) | 3 (30) | 9 (36) | 66 (33.3) |
*The presence of at least one symptom compatible with Carrion’s disease, including fever, joint pain, headache, malaise, pallor, myalgia and warts.
Positive results for each technique in the different study sites.
| Tunal | Guayaquiles | Los Ranchos | Mayland | Post-outbreak areas | Endemic area (Huancabamba) | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/N (%) | n/N (%) | n/N (%) | n/N (%) | n/N (%) | n/N (%) | n/N (%) | |||
| 30/94 (31.9) | 15/25 (60) | 10/44 (22.7) | 9/10 (90) | 64/173 (37) | 13/25 (52) | 0.1883 | 77/198 (38.9) | ||
| 21/75 (28) | 8/25 (32) | 8/43 (18.6) | 4/10 (40) | 41/153 (26.8) | 3/24 (12.5) | 0.0575 | 45/177 (25.4) | ||
| 19/75 (25.3) | 9/25 (36) | 17/43 (39.5) | 5/10 (50) | 50/153 (32.7) | 10/24 (41.7) | 0.4869 | 60/177 (33.9) | ||
| 14/75 (18.7) | 6/25 (24) | 10/43 (23.3) | 2/10 (20) | 32/153 (20.9) | 16/24 (66.7) | 0.0001 | 48/177 (27.1) | ||
| 55/75 (73.3) | 23/25(92) | 31/43 (72.1) | 10/10 (100) | 119/153 (77.8) | 22/24 (91.7) | 0.1715 | 141/177 (79.7) | ||
†Only individuals with both blood and serum samples were considered (n = 177).
1Statistical significance between the positivity in the 4 post-outbreak villages taken together and the positivity in the endemic area (Huancabamba).
‡IFA results were almost significantly lower in the endemic area than in the 4 post-outbreak villages taken together (P = 0.0575).
**ELISA IgG values were significantly higher in Huancabamba than in the 4 post-outbreak villages taken together (P = 0.0001).
The superscript letters represent the statistically significant differences between the positivity in 2 specific areas
a P = 0.0189
b P = 0.0370
c P = 0.0006
d P = 0.0001
e P = 0.0178
f P<0.0001
g P = 0.0041
h P = 0.0007
i P = 0.0229.
The RT-PCR values between Mayland and Huancabamba were almost statistically significant (P = 0.0548). In all cases the Fisher exact test was used.
Fig 1Distribution of B. bacilliformis antibodies by IFA assay among the study population (n = 177).
Fig 2Example of a positive IFA test.
A) 20X objective and 10X oculars. B) 100X objective and 10X oculars.
Fig 3IgM and IgG antibodies in the study population.
A) Overall data. Data are presented as boxplots that illustrate the medians and the maximum and minimum. B) IgM and IgG distribution by sex; C) IgM and IgG distribution by locality. P-values obtained on comparing the 4 post-outbreak areas with the endemic area. When comparing pairs of localities we obtained significance for IgG with the following analysis: Guayaquiles and Huancabamba (P = 0.0001); Los Ranchos and Huancabamba (P = 0.0002); Mayland and Huancabamba (P = 0.0201); Tunal and Huancabamba (P<0.0001). D) IgM and IgG distribution by age groups. P-values obtained comparing the antibody levels of subjects between ≤ 25 years with ≥ 26 years. In panels B, C and D the data are presented as boxplots that illustrate the medians and the 25th and 75th quartiles, and the whiskers represent the 10% and 90% percentiles. Outliers are marked with circles. P-values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney test.
Distribution of the positive individuals for each diagnostic technique used according to the symptoms described.
| N (%) | RT | ELISA_IgM | ELISA_IgG | IFA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| 48 (27.1) | 23 (47.9) | 10 (20.8) | 13 (27.1) | 15 (31.3) | |
| 10 (5.6) | 3 (30.0) | 2 (20.0) | 2 (20.0) | 4 (40.0) | |
| 8 (4.5) | 4 (50.0) | 2 (25.0) | 3 (37.5) | 4 (50.0) | |
| 8 (4.5) | 4 (50.0) | 2 (25.0) | 3 (37.5) | 4 (50.0) | |
| 8 (4.5) | 4 (50.0) | 2 (25.0) | 4 (50.0) | 3 (37.5) | |
| 5 (2.8) | 4 (80.0) | 2 (40.0) | 1 (20.0) | 4 (80.0) | |
| 1 (0.6) | 0 | 0 | 1 (100.0) | 0 | |
| 60 (33.9) | 27 (45.0) | 13 (21.7) | 17 (28.3) | 18 (30.0) |
* percentage in the population (considering n = 177).
** 6 more individuals presented headache but were not considered in this table because only the blood sample were collected.
Concordance among the techniques used.
| RT-PCR | IFA | ELISA IgM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |||||
| + | - | + | - | + | - | ||
| IFA | + | 20 (11.3) | 24 (13.6) | ||||
| - | 53 (29.9) | 80 (45.2) | |||||
| ELISA IgM | + | 24 (13.6) | 36 (20.3) | 14 (7.90) | 46 (26.0) | ||
| - | 49 (27.7) | 68 (38.4) | 30 (16.9) | 87 (49.2) | |||
| ELISA IgG | + | 19 (10.7) | 29 (16.4) | 9 (5.1) | 39 (22.0) | 19 (10.7) | 29 (16.4) |
| - | 54 (30.5) | 75 (42.4) | 35 (19.8) | 94 (53.1) | 41 (23.2) | 88 (49.7) | |
Only individuals with both blood and serum samples were considered (n = 177).
Fig 4Antigenic candidates of B. bacilliformis selected.
A) SDS gel with sonicated whole cell B. bacilliformis. B) Example of a Western blot with a positive serum by ELISA. The left panel corresponds to IgG and the right panel to IgM.
N-terminal sequencing results.
| Protein | N-terminal sequence | Molecular Mass (KDa) | Homologous Protein | Identity | Accession number | Organism |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | AAKEVKFGRDARERL | 57.52 | GroEL | 100.0 | CH60_BARBK | |
| 57.62 | GroEL | 100.0 | CH60_BARBA | |||
| 57.62 | GroEL | 93.3 | CH60_BARHE | |||
| 57.61 | GroEL | 93.3 | CH60_BARQU | |||
| 57.60 | GroEL | 93.3 | CH60_BART1 | |||
| B | MNIHEYQAKRLLHEY | 42.74 | SCS-β | 100.0 | SUCC_BARBK | |
| 42.82 | SCS-β | 100.0 | SUCC_BARHE | |||
| 43.00 | SCS-β | 100.0 | SUCC_BARQU | |||
| 42.87 | SCS-β | 100.0 | SUCC_BART1 | |||
| 42.53 | SCS-β | 93.3 | SUCC_BRUAB | |||
| 42.53 | SCS-β | 93.3 | SUCC_BRUA1 | |||
| 42.53 | SCS-β | 93.3 | SUCC_BRUC2 | |||
| 42.53 | SCS-β | 93.3 | SUCC_BRUMB | |||
| 42.53 | SCS-β | 93.3 | SUCC_BRUME | |||
| 42.53 | SCS-β | 93.3 | SUCC_BRUO2 | |||
| 42.53 | SCS-β | 93.3 | SUCC_BRUSU | |||
| 42.53 | SCS-β | 93.3 | SUCC_BRUSI | |||
| 42.52 | SCS-β | 93.3 | SUCC_OCHA4 | |||
| C | SILINKDTKVLVQGL | 30.93 | SCS-α | 100.0 | WP_024847155 | |
| 30.99 | SCS-α | 100.0 | BG36_06620 | |||
| 32.92 | SCS-α | 100.0 | B9JCF2_AGRRK | |||
| 30.90 | SCS-α | 100.0 | B9JTS6_AGRVS | |||
| 31.07 | SCS-α | 100.0 | E6YT34_9RHIZ | |||
| 30.99 | SCS-α | 100.0 | E6YXC2_9RHIZ | |||
| 30.99 | SCS-α | 100.0 | WP_035454724 | |||
| 30.99 | SCS-α | 100.0 | A1UQW0_BARBK | |||
| 31.01 | SCS-α | 100.0 | E6YNR1_9RHIZ | |||
| 30.96 | SCS-α | 100.0 | WP_026620040 | |||
| 30.90 | SCS-α | 100.0 | A9DG17_HOEPD | |||
| 31.08 | SCS-α | 100.0 | WP_027835951 | |||
| 30.97 | SCS-α | 100.0 | WP_028751285 | |||
| 30.99 | SCS-α | 100.0 | L0LRG5_RHITR | |||
| 30.90 | SCS-α | 100.0 | WP_026615514 | |||
| 30.93 | SCS-α | 100.0 | WP_028001748 | |||
| 30.87 | SCS-α | 100.0 | G9A287_RHIFH | |||
| 30.97 | SCS-α | 100.0 | I3XDY7_RHIFR | |||
| 30.91 | SCS-α | 100.0 | A6UDP1_SINMW | |||
| 30.93 | SCS-α | 100.0 | F7X0D4_SINMM | |||
| D | ADVMIPQEISPIISA | 31.70 | Pap31 | 100.0 | Q3HM50_BARBA | |
| 31.16 | Pap31 | 100.0 | WP_035454931 | |||
| 31.61 | Omp25 | 100.0 | A1UU13_BARBK |
* As indicated in Fig 4.
** Only those with identity levels > 90%.
Positive prevalence for the antigenic candidate ELISAs.
| SCS-α | Pap31 | SCS-β | GroEL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |
| IgM | 137 (77.4) | 172 (97.2) | 168 (94.9) | 138 (78.0) |
| IgG | 61 (34.5) | 104 (58.8) | 106 (59.9) | 70 (39.5) |
*Succinyl-CoA synthetase. Cut offs considered: SCS-α (IgM) = 0.076; SCS-α (IgG) = 0.130; Pap31 (IgM) = 0.088; Pap31 (IgG) = 0.212; SCS-β (IgM) = 0.056; SCS-β (IgG) = 0.107; GroEL (IgM) = 0.093; GroEL (IgG) = 0.400
Fig 5IgM and IgG levels for antigenic candidate ELISAs.
A) Overall IgM and IgG data for the study population. Data are presented as boxplots that illustrate the medians and the 1 and 99% percentiles. Outliers are marked with circles. B) IgM ELISA results of post-outbreak localities for SCS-α, Pap31, SCS-β and GroEL according to IFA results. C) IgM ELISA results of post-outbreak localities for SCS-α, Pap31, SCS-β and GroEL according to RT-PCR results. D) IgM and IgG ELISA result of post-outbreak population for SCS-α, Pap31, SCS-β and GroEL taking into account the whole cell B. bacilliformis ELISA assay. E) IgM and IgG ELISA result for the endemic area (Huancabamba) for SCS-α, Pap31, SCS-β and GroEL according to the whole cell B. bacilliformis ELISA assay. For B, C, D and E data are presented as boxplots that illustrate the medians and the 25th and 75th quartiles, and the whiskers represent the 1% and 99% percentiles. Outliers are marked with circles. P-values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney test.