| Literature DB >> 29940859 |
Ainur Ismagul1, Nannan Yang1,2, Elina Maltseva3, Gulnur Iskakova1,3, Inna Mazonka1, Yuri Skiba3, Huihui Bi1,4, Serik Eliby1, Satyvaldy Jatayev5, Yuri Shavrukov1,6, Nikolai Borisjuk1,7, Peter Langridge8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relatively low efficiency of biolistic transformation and subsequent integration of multiple copies of the introduced gene/s significantly complicate the genetic modification of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and other plant species. One of the key factors contributing to the reproducibility of this method is the uniformity of the DNA/gold suspension, which is dependent on the coating procedure employed. It was also shown recently that the relative frequency of single copy transgene inserts could be increased through the use of nanogram quantities of the DNA during coating.Entities:
Keywords: Biolistic transformation; DNA/gold coating; Immature embryo; Single copy events; Transformation frequency; Triticum aestivum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29940859 PMCID: PMC6020210 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-018-1326-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the hpt and GUS gene constructs used in the transformation experiments. P-Ubi, ubiquitin promoter (1.6 Kb); hpt, hygromycin resistance gene (1 Kb); GUS, gusA gene (1.8 Kb); 35S, 35S terminator (200 bp); Nos, Nos terminator (258 bp). About ~ 3 Kb hpt DNA cassette was used for stable transformation
Fig. 2The bombarded T. monococcum suspension cells. The treated cultures exhibit relatively uniform distribution of the X-Gluc stained cells over an area of 30–40 mm in diameter
Fig. 3Relative number of GUS-positive cells in wheat cell suspension cultures bombarded under different DNA/gold coating conditions. a Incubation time (20 min and 3 h, light and dark purple, respectively) for different coating methods. b Sources of ions: 80 mM MgCl2 or MgAc. P-Ubi:GUS DNA cassette (300 ng per shot) was used for each treatment. The Spd/Ca2+ method with 20 min incubation was set as one unit. Bars represent means ± standard errors for three replicates. Different letters above the bars represent significant differences (P < 0.05) using Student’s t-test
Summary of T0 transgenic wheat plants regenerated in 19 independent events of biolistic transformations
| Experiment | No. trans-formed embryos | Transgene copy No. | No. hygromycin resistant plants (HmR) | No. GOI transformants | GOI with one copy transformants (%) | Transformation frequency, TF, HmR (%) | Co-transformation, Co-TF (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | ≥3 | |||||||
| T01 | 857 | 18 | 19 | 4 | 17 | 58 | 40 | 47.5 | 6.8 | 69.0 |
| T02 | 998 | 36 | 29 | 7 | 40 | 112 | 76 | 38.2 | 11.2 | 67.9 |
| T03 | 1005 | 21 | 22 | 5 | 29 | 77 | 56 | 39.3 | 7.7 | 72.7 |
| T04 | 912 | 21 | 20 | 2 | 56 | 99 | 78 | 25.6 | 10.8 | 78.8 |
| T05 | 899 | 14 | 23 | 7 | 44 | 88 | 74 | 31.1 | 9.8 | 84.1 |
| T06 | 753 | 18 | 15 | 0 | 13 | 46 | 28 | 53.6 | 6.1 | 60.9 |
| T07 | 950 | 37 | 60 | 31 | 65 | 193 | 156 | 38.5 | 20.3 | 80.8 |
| T08 | 914 | 62 | 48 | 14 | 28 | 152 | 90 | 53.3 | 16.6 | 59.2 |
| T09 | 936 | 38 | 51 | 16 | 6 | 111 | 73 | 69.9 | 11.9 | 65.8 |
| T10 | 735 | 10 | 25 | 14 | 38 | 87 | 77 | 32.5 | 11.8 | 88.5 |
| T11 | 729 | 20 | 19 | 7 | 82 | 128 | 108 | 17.6 | 17.6 | 84.4 |
| T12 | 662 | 14 | 25 | 8 | 1 | 48 | 34 | 73.5 | 7.2 | 70.8 |
| T13 | 620 | 2 | 15 | 6 | 72 | 95 | 93 | 16.1 | 15.3 | 97.9 |
| T14 | 708 | 11 | 30 | 2 | 38 | 81 | 70 | 42.9 | 11.4 | 84.6 |
| T15 | 847 | 33 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 48 | 15 | 40.0 | 5.7 | 31.3 |
| T16 | 856 | 16 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 36 | 20 | 40.0 | 4.2 | 55.6 |
| T17 | 777 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 24 | 19 | 42.1 | 3.1 | 79.2 |
| T18 | 681 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 22 | 21 | 33.3 | 3.2 | 94.5 |
| T19 | 657 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 11 | 33 | 21 | 42.9 | 5.0 | 63.6 |
| Total | 15,496 | 389 | 439 | 139 | 571 | 1538 | 1149 | |||
| Transformation, % | 100 | 9.9 | 7.4 | 74.7 | ||||||
| GOI transformation, % | – | 38.2 | 12.1 | 49.7 | 100 | |||||
Data summarized for 19 stable transformation experiments. The transgene copy numbers of GOI in each event were determined by qPCR and confirmed by the Southern blot
Fig. 4Example of Southern blot of transgenic wheat plants with different copy numbers of the transgene. Four out of the eight transgenic lines had single transgene insertions (underlined). Four other transgenic lines (not underlined) had multiple copy numbers of the transgene. A positive control, consisting of DNA from a barley plant with a single transgene insertion is indicated as the ‘Control’. The negative control is represented by wild-type (WT) wheat DNA (cv. Gladius)
Fig. 5Biolistic wheat transformation process with hygromycin selection. a Freshly isolated immature embryo; (b) 2 week-old embryogenic callus before bombardment; (c) Shoot regeneration on 50 mg/L hygromycin selection medium; (d) Shoot and root regeneration on 50 mg/L hygromycin selection medium; (e) Plantlet recovery in 1/2 MS medium; (f) T0 transgenic plants in the greenhouse