Literature DB >> 29940251

Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsies in the PICTURE Study.

Saiful Miah1, David Eldred-Evans2, Lucy A M Simmons3, Taimur T Shah4, Abi Kanthabalan3, Manit Arya5, Mathias Winkler4, Neil McCartan3, Alex Freeman6, Shonit Punwani7, Caroline M Moore3, Mark Emberton3, Hashim U Ahmed8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy is an increasingly used method of procuring tissue from men with suspected prostate cancer. We report patient related outcome measures and adverse events in men in the PICTURE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01492270) who underwent this diagnostic test.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 249 men underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy as a validation study. Functional outcomes before and after transperineal template prostate mapping were prospectively collected and recorded with questionnaires, including the I-PSS (International Prostate Symptom Score), the I-PSS-QoL (Quality of Life), the IIEF-15 (International Index of Erectile Function-15) and the EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) urinary function.
RESULTS: Mean age was 62 years, median prostate specific antigen was 6.8 ng/ml and median gland size was 37 ml. At transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy a median of 49 cores (IQR 40-55) were taken. Mean time to complete the post-procedure patient related outcome measure questionnaires was 46 days. Adverse events included post-procedure acute urinary retention in 24% of patients, rectal pain in 26% and perineal pain in 41%. Transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy resulted in a statistically significant increase in scores on the I-PSS from 10.9 to 11.8 (p = 0.024) and the I-PSS-QoL from 1.57 to 1.76 (p = 0.03). The IIEF-15 erectile function score decreased by 23.2% from 47.7 to 38.7 (p <0.001). Significant deterioration was noted in all 5 of IIEF-15 functional domains, including erectile and orgasmic function, sexual desire, and intercourse and overall satisfaction (p <0.001). EPIC urinary scores showed no overall change from baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy causes a high urinary retention rate and a detrimental impact on genitourinary functional outcomes, including deterioration in urinary flow and sexual function. Our findings can be used to ensure adequate counseling about transperineal template prostate mapping biopsies. The results point to a need for strategies such as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsies to minimize the harms of transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy.
Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; image-guided biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; patient reported outcome measures; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29940251     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

1.  [Systematic evidence analysis for comparison of MRI-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Sigle; C A Jilg; S Schmidt; A Miernik
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer in the era of routine multi-parametric MRI.

Authors:  M J Connor; M A Gorin; H U Ahmed; R Nigam
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Developments in optimizing transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Emily Cheng; Meenakshi Davuluri; Patrick J Lewicki; Jim C Hu; Spyridon P Basourakos
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.808

Review 4.  All change in the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.

Authors:  Derek J Lomas; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Rationale and protocol for randomized study of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy efficacy and complications (ProBE-PC study).

Authors:  Badar M Mian; Ronald P Kaufman; Hugh A G Fisher
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 6.  Value of systematic sampling in an mp-MRI targeted prostate biopsy strategy.

Authors:  Martin J Connor; Saiful Miah; Rajiv Jayadevan; Christopher C Khoo; David Eldred-Evans; Taimur Shah; Hashim U Ahmed; Leonard Marks
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06

7.  Using the Movember Foundation's GAP3 cohort to measure the effect of active surveillance on patient-reported urinary and sexual function-a retrospective study in low-risk prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  R Trafford Crump; Sebastiaan Remmers; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Jozien Helleman; Daan Nieboer; Monique J Roobol; Lionne D F Venderbos
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

8.  Which Prostate Cancers are Undetected by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men with Previous Prostate Biopsy? An Analysis from the PICTURE Study.

Authors:  Joseph M Norris; Lucy A M Simmons; Abi Kanthabalan; Alex Freeman; Neil McCartan; Caroline M Moore; Shonit Punwani; Hayley C Whitaker; Mark Emberton; Hashim U Ahmed
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-06-15

Review 9.  Current techniques of prostate biopsy: an update from past to present.

Authors:  Mohamed Essam Noureldin; Martin J Connor; Nicholas Boxall; Saiful Miah; Taimur Shah; Jochen Walz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06

10.  Patient-Centered Outcomes From Multiparametric MRI and MRI-Guided Biopsy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samuel W D Merriel; Victoria Hardy; Matthew J Thompson; Fiona M Walter; Willie Hamilton
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.532

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.