Literature DB >> 29939974

Three Methods of Pelvic Fixation for Scoliosis in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Differences at 5-year Follow-Up.

Oussama Abousamra1, Brian T Sullivan1, Amer F Samdani2, Burt Yaszay3, Patrick J Cahill2, Peter O Newton3, Paul D Sponseller1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess correction of pelvic obliquity in children with cerebral palsy (CP) scoliosis postoperatively and 5 years after posterior spinal fusion with pelvic fixation using unit rods, sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screws, or iliac screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are multiple options for pelvic fixation in children with scoliosis secondary to CP. The long-term differences in outcomes between these fixation methods are still unclear.
METHODS: A multicenter review identified records of 70 children with CP who underwent posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis using unit rods (n = 9), SAI screws (n = 19), or iliac screws (n = 42). Patients younger than 18 years with 5-year follow-up were included. Pelvic obliquity and major coronal curve measurements were compared using preoperative, (first erect) postoperative, and 5-year follow-up radiographs. Implant-related complications were noted. Alpha = 0.05.
RESULTS: For all groups, there was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative pelvic obliquity that was maintained at 5 years. At 5-year follow-up, pelvic obliquity was significantly higher in the IS group (12°) compared with the unit rod group (4°, P = 0.001) and SAI screw group (6°) (P = 0.006). Implant-related complications were as follows: unit rod group, one patient (reoperation); SAI screw group, none; iliac screw group, six patients, including three cases of loss of connection between the rod and the iliac screw, two prominent screws, and one loose screw.
CONCLUSION: Correction of pelvic obliquity for children with CP-related scoliosis was achieved postoperatively using unit rods, SAI screws, and iliac screws. Implant-related complications and reoperations were most common in the iliac screw group. At 5-year follow-up, the iliac screw group had loss of major curve correction and less correction of pelvic obliquity than the unit rod and SAI screw groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29939974     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparative radiological outcomes and complications of sacral-2-alar iliac screw versus iliac screw for sacropelvic fixation.

Authors:  Ziwei Gao; Xun Sun; Chao Chen; Zhaowei Teng; Baoshan Xu; Xinlong Ma; Zheng Wang; Qiang Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Spinal Fusion with Sacral Alar Iliac Pelvic Fixation in Severe Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

Authors:  Krishna V Suresh; Ijezie Ikwuezunma; Adam Margalit; Paul D Sponseller
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2021-08-16

3.  Clinical Effectiveness of S2-Alar Iliac Screws in Spinopelvic Fixation in Pediatric Neuromuscular Scoliosis: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Vijay M Ravindra; Marcus D Mazur; Douglas L Brockmeyer; Kristin L Kraus; Alexander E Ropper; Darrell S Hanson; Benny T Dahl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-07

4.  Clinical Issues in Indication, Correction, and Outcomes of the Surgery for Neuromuscular Scoliosis: Narrative Review in Pedicle Screw Era.

Authors:  Hak Sun Kim; Ji Won Kwon; Kun-Bo Park
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-01-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.