Literature DB >> 29938305

Characterization of methanthelinium binding and function at human M1-M5 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Matthias Irmen1, Janine Holze1, Theresa Bödefeld1, Christian Tränkle2.   

Abstract

Firstly, it was determined whether methanthelinium bromide (MB) binds to human M1-M5 (hM1-hM5) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in comparison to the classical muscarinic antagonist N-methylscopolamine (NMS). [3H]NMS dissociation binding experiments revealed an allosteric retardation of dissociation at 100 μM of MB ranging from none in hM3 to 4.6-fold in hM2 receptors. Accordingly, global non-linear regression analysis of equilibrium inhibition binding curves between [3H]NMS (0.2 and 2.0 nM) and MB was applied and compared using either an allosteric or a competitive model. The allosteric cooperativity of MB binding within MB/NMS/hM receptor complexes was strongly negative and undistinguishable from a competitive interaction throughout all subtypes. Applying the competitive model to the equilibrium binding data of MB and NMS, suggested competition at all hM subtypes: logKI (± S.E.) hM3 = 8.71 ± 0.15, hM1 = 8.68 ± 0.14, hM5 = 8.58 ± 0.07, hM2 = 8.27 ± 0.07 to hM4 = 8.25 ± 0.11. Secondly, the effects of MB on acetylcholine (ACh) induced hM receptor function showed very strong negative allosteric cooperativity at all subtypes pointing against an allosteric antagonism of MB with ACh. Competition with ACh was characterized by logKB: hM1 = 9.53 ± 0.05, hM4 = 9.33 ± 0.05, hM5 = 8.80 ± 0.05, hM2 = 8,79 ± 0.06, to hM3 = 8.43 ± 0.04. In conclusion, MB, below 1 μM, binds competitively and non-selectively (except for the difference between hM3 vs. hM4) to all five hM receptor subtypes with nanomolar affinity and is able to functionally inhibit ACh responses in a competitive fashion, with a slight subtype preference for hM1 and hM4.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allosteric; Hyperhidrosis axillaris; Methanthelinium bromide; Muscarinic receptor; NMS; Orthosteric

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29938305     DOI: 10.1007/s00210-018-1525-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol        ISSN: 0028-1298            Impact factor:   3.000


  41 in total

1.  Modeling the functional effects of allosteric modulators at pharmacological receptors: an extension of the two-state model of receptor activation.

Authors:  D A Hall
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 2.  Eccrine sweat gland disorders.

Authors:  K Sato; M Ohtsuyama; G Samman
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Characterization of muscarinic receptor subtype of rat eccrine sweat gland by autoradiography.

Authors:  N E Torres; P J Zollman; P A Low
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1991-05-31       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  International Union of Pharmacology. XVII. Classification of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  M P Caulfield; N J Birdsall
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 5.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: novel opportunities for drug development.

Authors:  Andrew C Kruse; Brian K Kobilka; Dinesh Gautam; Patrick M Sexton; Arthur Christopoulos; Jürgen Wess
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  Treatment of primary hyperhidrosis with oral anticholinergic medications: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Cruddas; D M Baker
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Calculating receptor number from binding experiments using same compound as radioligand and competitor.

Authors:  A DeBlasi; K O'Reilly; H J Motulsky
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 8.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: mutant mice provide new insights for drug development.

Authors:  Jürgen Wess; Richard M Eglen; Dinesh Gautam
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 84.694

9.  Some quantitative uses of drug antagonists.

Authors:  O ARUNLAKSHANA; H O SCHILD
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol Chemother       Date:  1959-03

10.  The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints.

Authors:  Robert Fredriksson; Malin C Lagerström; Lars-Gustav Lundin; Helgi B Schiöth
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.