Literature DB >> 29938212

Patient Portal Usage in Pediatric Urology: Is it Meaningful Use for Everyone?

Ruth A Bush1, Andrew C Richardson2, Diana Cardona-Grau3, Hena Din4, Cynthia L Kuelbs5, George J Chiang3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Affordable Care Act promotes multiple directives for meaningful use of the Electronic Health Record, such as patient/provider portals, to increase patient engagement. Although portal use is common within adult healthcare, little information exists regarding pediatric portal use. We examined pediatric urology patient portal enrollment and activation patterns at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Southern California by race/ethnicity, preferred language, gender, and residential region.
METHODS: Retrospective Electronic Health Record analysis of enrollment in patient portal from January 2010 to May 2016 among 10,464 patients with at least one outpatient urology clinic visit. Differences in adoption rates were examined using logistic regression for the following categories: activated (or caregiver activated); code accepted not activated; declined; or activated/then deactivated.
RESULTS: Overall, 46.5% of patients/caregivers activated the portal. Primarily Spanish-speaking patients were less likely to activate (OR 0.25, p <.001) than English-speaking patients. Males (OR 0.89, p =.004); those self-identifying racially as Other (not White, Asian, or African American) (OR 0.47, p <.001); and Hispanic patients (OR 0.49, p <.001) were less likely to activate. Suburban patients were up to 3 times more likely to activate portals than central urban patients depending on the region (OR 2.94, p <.001). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated Spanish-speaking patients were 3 times less likely to activate while controlling for demographic and region variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary language and socioeconomic factors may be significant barriers to portal adoption. Patient education to reduce these barriers may increase portal acceptance and increase meaningfulness to the portal for patients/parents and providers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic health record; health information technology; meaningful use; patient engagement; patient portal

Year:  2017        PMID: 29938212      PMCID: PMC6010344          DOI: 10.1016/j.urpr.2017.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Pract        ISSN: 2352-0779


  15 in total

1.  Patient Portals: Who uses them? What features do they use? And do they reduce hospital readmissions?

Authors:  Ashley Griffin; Asheley Skinner; Jonathan Thornhill; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Parents' perceptions of a patient portal for managing their child's chronic illness.

Authors:  Maria T Britto; Elizabeth A Hesse; Opal J Kamdar; Jennifer Knopf Munafo
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Association of online patient access to clinicians and medical records with use of clinical services.

Authors:  Ted E Palen; Colleen Ross; J David Powers; Stanley Xu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Exploring perceptions and use of the electronic health record by parents of children with autism spectrum disorder: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Ruth A Bush; Aubyn C Stahmer; Cynthia D Connelly
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; David Rind; Zachary Tofias; Daniel Z Sands
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  The impact of health literacy on a patient's decision to adopt a personal health record.

Authors:  Alice M Noblin; Thomas T H Wan; Myron Fottler
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-10-01

Review 7.  Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Lubick Goldzweig; Greg Orshansky; Neil M Paige; Ali Alexander Towfigh; David A Haggstrom; Isomi Miake-Lye; Jessica M Beroes; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Patient Portals and Patient Engagement: A State of the Science Review.

Authors:  Taya Irizarry; Annette DeVito Dabbs; Christine R Curran
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Scott Kruse; Darcy A Argueta; Lynsey Lopez; Anju Nair
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Improving diabetes management with a patient portal: a qualitative study of diabetes self-management portal.

Authors:  Sara Urowitz; David Wiljer; Kourtney Dupak; Zachary Kuehner; Kevin Leonard; Emily Lovrics; Peter Picton; Emily Seto; Joe Cafazzo
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

1.  Using Electronic Health Record Portals to Improve Patient Engagement: Research Priorities and Best Practices.

Authors:  Courtney R Lyles; Eugene C Nelson; Susan Frampton; Patricia C Dykes; Anupama G Cemballi; Urmimala Sarkar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Providing Access: Differences in Pediatric Portal Activation Begin at Patient Check-in.

Authors:  Ruth A Bush; Vijaya M Vemulakonda; Andrew C Richardson; Sara J Deakyne Davies; George J Chiang
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Internet Access Influences Community Clinic Portal Use.

Authors:  Ruth A Bush; Halsey Barlow; Alexa Pérez; Bianca Vazquez; Jonathan Mack; Cynthia D Connelly
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2018-08-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.