Literature DB >> 29937592

AN EVOLUTIONARY MODEL OF TUMOR CELL KINETICS AND THE EMERGENCE OF MOLECULAR HETEROGENEITY DRIVING GOMPERTZIAN GROWTH.

Jeffrey West1, Zaki Hasnain1, Paul Macklin2, Paul K Newton1,3.   

Abstract

We describe a cell-molecular based evolutionary mathematical model of tumor development driven by a stochastic Moran birth-death process. The cells in the tumor carry molecular information in the form of a numerical genome which we represent as a four-digit binary string used to differentiate cells into 16 molecular types. The binary string is able to undergo stochastic point mutations that are passed to a daughter cell after each birth event. The value of the binary string determines the cell fitness, with lower fit cells (e.g. 0000) defined as healthy phenotypes, and higher fit cells (e.g. 1111) defined as malignant phenotypes. At each step of the birth-death process, the two phenotypic sub-populations compete in a prisoner's dilemma evolutionary game with the healthy cells playing the role of cooperators, and the cancer cells playing the role of defectors. Fitness, birth-death rates of the cell populations, and overall tumor fitness are defined via the prisoner's dilemma payoff matrix. Mutation parameters include passenger mutations (mutations conferring no fitness advantage) and driver mutations (mutations which increase cell fitness). The model is used to explore key emergent features associated with tumor development, including tumor growth rates as it relates to intratumor molecular heterogeneity. The tumor growth equation states that the growth rate is proportional to the logarithm of cellular diversity/heterogeneity. The Shannon entropy from information theory is used as a quantitative measure of heterogeneity and tumor complexity based on the distribution of the 4-digit binary sequences produced by the cell population. To track the development of heterogeneity from an initial population of healthy cells (0000), we use dynamic phylogenetic trees which show clonal and sub-clonal expansions of cancer cell sub-populations from an initial malignant cell. We show tumor growth rates are not constant throughout tumor development, and are generally much higher in the subclinical range than in later stages of development, which leads to a Gompertzian growth curve. We explain the early exponential growth of the tumor and the later saturation associated with the Gompertzian curve which results from our evolutionary simulations using simple statistical mechanics principles related to the degree of functional coupling of the cell states. We then compare dosing strategies at early stage development, mid-stage (clinical stage), and late stage development of the tumor. If used early during tumor development in the subclinical stage, well before the cancer cell population is selected for growth, therapy is most effective at disrupting key emergent features of tumor development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Moran process; birth-death process; cancer model; evolutionary game theory; gompertzian tumor growth; tumor heterogeneity

Year:  2016        PMID: 29937592      PMCID: PMC6013275          DOI: 10.1137/15M1044825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SIAM Rev Soc Ind Appl Math        ISSN: 0036-1445            Impact factor:   10.780


  39 in total

1.  Evolution of resistance during clonal expansion.

Authors:  Yoh Iwasa; Martin A Nowak; Franziska Michor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A Gompertzian model of human breast cancer growth.

Authors:  L Norton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  G H Heppner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Simulating the hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  Robert G Abbott; Stephanie Forrest; Kenneth J Pienta
Journal:  Artif Life       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 0.667

Review 5.  Cancer as an evolutionary and ecological process.

Authors:  Lauren M F Merlo; John W Pepper; Brian J Reid; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 6.  Hybrid models of tumor growth.

Authors:  Katarzyna A Rejniak; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

Review 7.  Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-11-18

8.  Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma.

Authors:  A G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Intratumor heterogeneity: evolution through space and time.

Authors:  Charles Swanton
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Classical mathematical models for description and prediction of experimental tumor growth.

Authors:  Sébastien Benzekry; Clare Lamont; Afshin Beheshti; Amanda Tracz; John M L Ebos; Lynn Hlatky; Philip Hahnfeldt
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cellular interactions constrain tumor growth.

Authors:  Jeffrey West; Paul K Newton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The prisoner's dilemma as a cancer model.

Authors:  Jeffrey West; Zaki Hasnain; Jeremy Mason; Paul K Newton
Journal:  Converg Sci Phys Oncol       Date:  2016-07-04

3.  Learning differential equation models from stochastic agent-based model simulations.

Authors:  John T Nardini; Ruth E Baker; Matthew J Simpson; Kevin B Flores
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.118

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.