Literature DB >> 29936196

Comparison of clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft versus soft-tissue allograft: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Hong-De Wang1, Hao Zhang2, Tian-Rui Wang3, Wei-Fei Zhang4, Fu-Shun Wang5, Ying-Ze Zhang6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hamstring tendon autografts and soft-tissue allograft are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the clinical outcomes between these two grafts are controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare clinical outcomes of primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts versus soft-tissue allografts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through 8 September 2017 to identify randomized controlled studies that compared hamstring tendon autografts with soft-tissue allografts for primary ACL reconstruction. Two authors independently graded the methodological quality of each eligible study using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and extracted relevant data. Statistical heterogeneity among the trials was evaluated with chi-square and I-square tests. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify potential differences according to type of reconstruction technique (single-bundle or double-bundle).
RESULTS: Eight studies with 785 combined patients (396 hamstring tendon autografts and 389 soft-tissue allografts) were included. Two studies had a high risk of bias. The other six studies had unclear risk of bias. There were significant differences between the groups in subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (mean difference [MD], 2.43; 95%CI, 0.69-4.18; p = 0.006), Tegner score (MD, 0.24; 95%CI, 0.03-0.45; p = 0.03), and side-to-side difference (MD, -1.37; 95%CI, -2.44 to -0.30; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the groups in Lysholm score, complications, pivot shift test, anterior drawer test, Lachman test, overall IKDC score, or range of motion. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that for primary ACL reconstruction using the single-bundle technique, soft-tissue allografts were inferior to hamstring tendon autografts in subjective IKDC score, anterior drawer test, and side-to-side difference.
CONCLUSION: Soft-tissue allografts are inferior to hamstring tendon autografts with respect to subjective patient evaluation and knee stability but superior in the complication of hypoesthesia for patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction.
Copyright © 2018 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Hamstring tendon autograft; Outcomes; Soft-tissue allograft

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29936196     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  7 in total

Review 1.  Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Eigenschink; Philipp R Heuberer; Leo Pauzenberger; Grant E Garrigues; Leonard Achenbach; Sigbjorn Dimmen; Brenda Laky; Lior Laver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Clinical outcome after knee ligament reconstruction with tendon allografts.

Authors:  Jon Olav Drogset; Kristina Hovde Størset; Thea Marie Nitteberg; Tone Gifstad
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-02-07

Review 3.  Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Comparative Effectiveness and Safety. Results of a Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Gregor Goetz; Cecilia de Villiers; Patrick Sadoghi; Sabine Geiger-Gritsch
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-13

4.  No difference in postoperative efficacy and safety between autograft and allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study in 112 patients.

Authors:  Bin-An Zhao; Yi-Yong Yao; Qing-Xin Ji; Zhen-Yu Li; Biao Cheng; Jian-Feng Pan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-03

5.  Predicting autologous hamstring graft diameter and finding reliable measurement levels in the Zhuang population using preoperative ultrasonography.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Huang; Hong-Yu Zheng; Ze-Feng Shi; Hui-Hui Yang; Bing Zhang; Xiao-Chun Yang; Hong Wang; Ru-Xin Tan
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Indications and Outcomes for Arthroscopic Hip Labral Reconstruction With Autografts: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Felipe S Bessa; Brady T Williams; Evan M Polce; Mansueto Neto; Flávio L Garcia; Gustavo Leporace; Leonardo Metsavaht; Jorge Chahla
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 7.  Patellar tendon versus artificial grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  DingYuan Fan; Jia Ma; Lei Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.