Jon Olav Drogset1, Kristina Hovde Størset2, Thea Marie Nitteberg2, Tone Gifstad2. 1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. jon.o.drogset@ntnu.no. 2. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome for patients after knee ligament reconstructions with allografts at a university hospital. METHODS: A total of 33 patients received allografts for reconstructive knee surgery between 2007 and 2017. The follow up evaluation consisted of a clinical knee examination including evaluation of range of motion (ROM), lateral and medial laxity, the Lachman test, the Pivot shift test, the sag test, the posterior drawer test and checking for patellofemoral pain. The following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used; the Lysholm Function Score, the Tegner activity score, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). RESULTS: Twenty-one (64%) patients were available for the follow-up evaluation and the mean follow-up time was 4.8 years. A total of 16 out of 21 patients had multiligament injuries of which the ACL was the ligament most frequently ruptured. At the time of follow-up, 14 out of 16 patients (87%) with ACL injury had Lachman test grade 0 or grade 1 + , and 12 out of 13 (92%) had a pivot shift grade 0 or 1 + . The mean Lysholm Score was 74. All mean KOOS subscale values were ≥ 59 at the follow-up. The preoperative Tegner activity score was 3 (range, 1-6) and 4 (range, 2-6) at follow up. There were no deep postoperative infections. A total of 19 out of 21 patients (90%) reported that they would have undergone surgery again had they known the clinical outcome in advance. CONCLUSIONS: The patients improved from the preoperative score to the follow-up score in the knee-related Quality of Life (QoL) KOOS subscale. None of the patients were diagnosed with deep postoperative infections.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome for patients after knee ligament reconstructions with allografts at a university hospital. METHODS: A total of 33 patients received allografts for reconstructive knee surgery between 2007 and 2017. The follow up evaluation consisted of a clinical knee examination including evaluation of range of motion (ROM), lateral and medial laxity, the Lachman test, the Pivot shift test, the sag test, the posterior drawer test and checking for patellofemoral pain. The following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were used; the Lysholm Function Score, the Tegner activity score, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). RESULTS: Twenty-one (64%) patients were available for the follow-up evaluation and the mean follow-up time was 4.8 years. A total of 16 out of 21 patients had multiligament injuries of which the ACL was the ligament most frequently ruptured. At the time of follow-up, 14 out of 16 patients (87%) with ACL injury had Lachman test grade 0 or grade 1 + , and 12 out of 13 (92%) had a pivot shift grade 0 or 1 + . The mean Lysholm Score was 74. All mean KOOS subscale values were ≥ 59 at the follow-up. The preoperative Tegner activity score was 3 (range, 1-6) and 4 (range, 2-6) at follow up. There were no deep postoperative infections. A total of 19 out of 21 patients (90%) reported that they would have undergone surgery again had they known the clinical outcome in advance. CONCLUSIONS: The patients improved from the preoperative score to the follow-up score in the knee-related Quality of Life (QoL) KOOS subscale. None of the patients were diagnosed with deep postoperative infections.
Authors: A Wajsfisz; X Bajard; S Plaweski; P Djian; G Demey; R Limozin; V Bousquet; G Rocheconcar; M-L Louis; J Arndt; M Azar; B Sonnery-Cottet; P Boisrenoult Journal: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res Date: 2014-10-29 Impact factor: 2.256
Authors: Santiago Pache; Zachary S Aman; Mitchell Kennedy; Gilberto Yoshinobu Nakama; Gilbert Moatshe; Connor Ziegler; Robert F LaPrade Journal: Arch Bone Jt Surg Date: 2018-01
Authors: David Wasserstein; Amir Khoshbin; Tim Dwyer; Jaskarndip Chahal; Rajiv Gandhi; Nizar Mahomed; Darrell Ogilvie-Harris Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Rohith Mohan; Kate E Webster; Nick R Johnson; Michael J Stuart; Timothy E Hewett; Aaron J Krych Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: V Condello; U Zdanowicz; Berardo Di Matteo; T Spalding; P E Gelber; P Adravanti; P Heuberer; S Dimmen; B Sonnery-Cottet; C Hulet; M Bonomo; E Kon Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 4.342