Literature DB >> 29936056

Poor prognostic impact of FGF4 amplification in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Jie Huang1, Qi Song1, Hao Wang2, Haixing Wang1, Chen Xu1, Xin Wang1, Zhengzeng Jiang1, Yanqiu Wang1, Yifan Xu1, Jieakesu Su1, Haiying Zeng1, Lijie Tan2, Hongguang Zhu3, Dongxian Jiang4, Yingyong Hou5.   

Abstract

In the present study, we aimed to determine the prognostic impact and clinicopathological feature of FGF4 amplification in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Fluorescence in situ hybridization with FGF4 probe was analyzed using tissue microarray consisting of representative cores of 267 ESCC cases. FGF4 amplification was observed in 52.8% (141/267) of patients. Patients with FGF4 amplification showed a significantly shorter disease-free survival (DFS) or disease-specific overall survival (OS) compared with those without FGF4 amplification (both P < .05). Moreover, FGF4 amplification was an independent prognostic factor (DFS, P = .036; OS, P = .021) along with clinical stage and lymph node metastasis in multivariate analysis. Among stage I-II or III patients whose DFS was greater than or equal to 24 months (n = 125 or 32), patients with FGF4 amplification showed a significantly worse prognosis (OS, P = .027 or P = .010). Moreover, the survival curve of stage I-II patients with FGF4 amplification was identical to stage III patients without FGF4 amplification (DFS, P = .643; OS, P = .707). Taken together, FGF4 amplification was an independent prognostic factor in ESCC patients, and ESCC might have potentially been upstaged by FGF4 amplification. Therefore, FGF4 amplification in combination with clinical stage could be used as a relatively accurate predictor for the 5-year probability of death and recurrence for ESCC patients.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical stage; Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); FGF4 amplification; Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); Poor prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29936056     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  4 in total

1.  IL-8, MSPa, MIF, FGF-9, ANG-2 and AgRP collection were identified for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer based on the support vector machine model.

Authors:  Mingfu Cui; Yanan Zhao; Zuocong Zhang; Yang Zhao; Songyun Han; Ruijie Wang; Dayong Ding; Xuedong Fang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Prognostic value of visual residual tumour cells (VRTC) for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas after neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery.

Authors:  Xingxing Wang; Hao Wang; Haixing Wang; Jie Huang; Xin Wang; Zhengzeng Jiang; Lijie Tan; Dongxian Jiang; Yingyong Hou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Mutational Characterization and Potential Prognostic Biomarkers of Chinese Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Nan Zhang; Junping Shi; Xiaoliang Shi; Wenting Chen; Junfeng Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Prognostic biomarker study in patients with clinical stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG0502-A1.

Authors:  Kotoe Oshima; Ken Kato; Yoshinori Ito; Hiroyuki Daiko; Isao Nozaki; Satoru Nakagawa; Yuichi Shibuya; Takashi Kojima; Yasushi Toh; Morihito Okada; Shuichi Hironaka; Yuji Akiyama; Yoshito Komatsu; Kazuhiro Maejima; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Ritsuko Onuki; Momoko Nagai; Mamoru Kato; Keisuke Kanato; Aya Kuchiba; Kenichi Nakamura; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.716

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.