Literature DB >> 29935274

Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.

Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah1, Mykyta Kachanov2, Dirk Beyersdorff3, Felix Preisser4, Derya Tilki1, Margit Fisch5, Markus Graefen2, Lars Budäus6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Based on findings in transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy series standard sampling of the prostate targets the posterior/peripheral zone. However, a substantial proportion of lesions that are prostate cancer suspicious and PI-RADS™ (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) 3 or greater on magnetic resonance imaging is located in the anterior segment of the prostate, requiring deeper placement and targeting of the biopsy needle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall 1,161 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided targeted biopsy. Prostate cancer suspicious lesions on magnetic resonance imaging were dichotomized into anterior vs posterior prostate segments. Patients were stratified by the number of prior negative systematic biopsy sessions. Descriptive statistics included the frequency and proportion of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings and corresponding histological results.
RESULTS: Targeted biopsy was performed in 513 patients (44%) who were systematic biopsy naïve, 396 (34%) with 1 prior negative systematic biopsy and 252 (22%) with 2 or more prior negative systematic biopsies. When patients were stratified by the number of prior systematic biopsy sessions, the proportion with exclusively anterior, PI-RADS 3 or greater lesions on magnetic resonance imaging increased from 3.5% to 9.1% (p = 0.006). Unfavorable 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 or greater primary Gleason patterns were identified in exclusively anterior vs posterior lesions in 31% vs 21% of the 448 patients, of whom 64 had exclusively anterior and 384 had posterior PI-RADS 3 or greater lesions, respectively, on magnetic resonance imaging. Multivariable logistic regression analyses confirmed these findings.
CONCLUSIONS: After multiple previous negative systematic biopsy sessions the proportion of anterior lesions on magnetic resonance imaging increased. Such lesions harbored a greater amount of unfavorable prostate cancer. Therefore, image guidance for precise targeting should be considered, especially after initially negative transrectal ultrasound guided systematic biopsy.
Copyright © 2018 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  histology; image-guided biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; prostatic neoplasms; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29935274     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Combined MRI-targeted Plus Systematic Confirmatory Biopsy Improves Risk Stratification for Patients Enrolling on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Luke P O'Connor; Alex Z Wang; Nitin K Yerram; Amir H Lebastchi; Michael Ahdoot; Sandeep Gurram; Johnathan Zeng; Sherif Mehralivand; Stephanie Harmon; Maria J Merino; Howard L Parnes; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  A comprehensive prostate biopsy standardization system according to quantitative multiparametric MRI and PSA value: P.R.O.S.T score.

Authors:  Chao Liang; Yuhao Wang; Lei Ding; Meiling Bao; Gong Cheng; Pengfei Shao; Lixin Hua; Bianjiang Liu; Jie Li
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Selecting patients for magnetic resonance imaging cognitive versus ultrasound fusion biopsy of the prostate: A within-patient comparison.

Authors:  Mitch Hayes; Solange Bassale; Nicholas H Chakiryan; Luc Boileau; Jacob Grassauer; Matthew Wagner; Bryan Foster; Fergus Coakley; Sudhir Isharwal; Christopher L Amling; Jen-Jane Liu
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2022-06-05

Review 4.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: the next step forward!

Authors:  Emanuel Darius Cata; Iulia Andras; Teodora Telecan; Attila Tamas-Szora; Radu-Tudor Coman; Dan-Vasile Stanca; Ioan Coman; Nicolae Crisan
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-04-29

5.  The Global Research of Artificial Intelligence on Prostate Cancer: A 22-Year Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Zefeng Shen; Haiyang Wu; Zeshi Chen; Jintao Hu; Jiexin Pan; Jianqiu Kong; Tianxin Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Evaluating the diagnostic role of in-bore magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy: a single-centre study.

Authors:  Marc A Furrer; Anne Hong; David Wetherell; Stefan B Heinze; Paul Simkin; Ken Chow; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Homayoun Zargar
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.025

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.