Literature DB >> 29935152

Comprehensive Nonsurgical Treatment Versus Self-directed Care to Improve Walking Ability in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Trial.

Carlo Ammendolia1, Pierre Côté2, Danielle Southerst3, Michael Schneider4, Brian Budgell5, Claire Bombardier6, Gillian Hawker6, Y Raja Rampersaud7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of a comprehensive nonsurgical training program to a self-directed approach in improving walking ability in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Academic hospital outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=104) with neurogenic claudication and imaging confirmed LSS were randomized. The mean age was 70.6 years, 57% were women, 84% had leg symptoms for >12 months, and the mean maximum walking capacity was 328.7 m.
INTERVENTIONS: A 6-week structured comprehensive training program or a 6-week self-directed program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Continuous walking distance in meters measured by the Self-Paced Walk Test (SPWT) and proportion of participants achieving at least 30% improvement (minimally clinically important difference [MCID]) in the SPWT at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), ODI walk score, and the Short-Form General Health Survey subscales.
RESULTS: A total of 48 versus 51 participants who were randomized to comprehensive (n=51) or self-directed (n=53) treatment, respectively, received the intervention and 89% of the total study sample completed the study. At 6 months, the adjusted mean difference in walking distance from baseline was 421.0 m (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 181.4-660.6), favoring the comprehensive program and 82% of participants in the comprehensive group and 63% in the self-directed group achieved the MCID (adjusted relative risk, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.7; P=.03). Both primary treatment effects persisted at 12 months favoring the comprehensive program. At 6 months, the ODI walk score and at 12 months the ZCQ, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey-physical function and -bodily pain scores showed greater improvements favoring the comprehensive program.
CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive conservative program demonstrated superior, large, and sustained improvements in walking ability and can be a safe nonsurgical treatment option for patients with neurogenic claudication due to LSS.
Copyright © 2018 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Back; Conservative treatment; Randomized controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Spinal stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29935152     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  13 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and characteristics of physiotherapy interventions in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Federico Temporiti; Silvano Ferrari; Michael Kieser; Roberto Gatti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.721

2.  Development of a Clinical Decision Aid for Chiropractic Management of Common Conditions Causing Low Back Pain in Veterans: Results of a Consensus Process.

Authors:  Robert D Vining; Zacariah K Shannon; Stacie A Salsbury; Lance Corber; Amy L Minkalis; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Treatment-based classification for low back pain: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robson Massi Bastos; Claudia Regina Moya; Rodrigo Antunes de Vasconcelos; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2022-01-24

4.  Conservative Treatment and Percutaneous Pain Relief Techniques in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Maurizio Fornari; Scott C Robertson; Paulo Pereira; Mehmet Zileli; Carla D Anania; Ana Ferreira; Silvano Ferrari; Roberto Gatti; Francesco Costa
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-06-23

5.  Effect of active TENS versus de-tuned TENS on walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Pierre Côté; Y Raja Rampersaud; Danielle Southerst; Michael Schneider; Aksa Ahmed; Claire Bombardier; Gillian Hawker; Brian Budgell
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2019-06-19

6.  The profile of older adults seeking chiropractic care: a secondary analysis.

Authors:  Katie de Luca; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Martha Funabashi; Silvano Mior; Simon D French
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.921

7.  The association between pain, balance, fall, and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with vascular claudication.

Authors:  Musa Güneş; Tarık Özmen; Tuğba Moralı Güler
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2021-10-01

8.  Multimodal non-surgical intervention for individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  James J Young; Deborah Kopansky-Giles; Carlo Ammendolia
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2019-08

9.  Comparison of walking variations during treadmill walking test between neurogenic and vascular claudication: a crossover study.

Authors:  Mariève Houle; Julie O'Shaughnessy; Charles Tétreau; Claude-Édouard Châtillon; Andrée-Anne Marchand; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2021-07-15

10.  Non-operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Corey Hofkirchner; Joshua Plener; André Bussières; Michael J Schneider; James J Young; Andrea D Furlan; Kent Stuber; Aksa Ahmed; Carol Cancelliere; Aleisha Adeboyejo; Joseph Ornelas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.