Literature DB >> 16814221

Comparison of selected outcomes of CenteringPregnancy versus traditional prenatal care.

Karen A Baldwin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of traditional prenatal care versus a group model of care, CenteringPregnancy, on maternal knowledge of pregnancy, social support, health locus of control, and satisfaction. The CenteringPregnancy model of care gives patients extended time with the provider in a group setting. The study used a two-group, pretest/posttest design of pregnant women who elected either the traditional approach to prenatal care (n = 48) or the Centering approach (n = 50). The results of this study showed statistically significant differences between the groups on posttest in knowledge of pregnancy. For social support and health locus of control, the high scores at pretest contributed to a ceiling effect, which limited the potential for change. Additional research is needed to assess health status outcomes among women electing alternative approaches to prenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16814221     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  27 in total

Review 1.  A review of prenatal group care literature: the need for a structured theoretical framework and systematic evaluation.

Authors:  Jeanelle Sheeder; Kim Weber Yorga; Karolyn Kabir-Greher
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

2.  Exploring the group prenatal care model: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Kathleen Thielen
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012

3.  Promoting Healthy Pregnancies Through Perinatal Groups: A Comparison of CenteringPregnancy(R) Group Prenatal Care and Childbirth Education Classes.

Authors:  Deborah S Walker; Renee Worrell
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2008

Review 4.  Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.

Authors:  Christine J Catling; Nancy Medley; Maralyn Foureur; Clare Ryan; Nicky Leap; Alison Teate; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-04

5.  Examining Delivery Method and Infant Feeding Intentions between Women in Traditional and Non-Traditional Prenatal Care.

Authors:  Deb Risisky; Ronna L Chan; Victoria A Zigmont; Syed Masood Asghar; Nancy DeGennaro
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-02

6.  The effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on gestational age, birth weight, and fetal demise.

Authors:  Emily E Tanner-Smith; Katarzyna T Steinka-Fry; Mark W Lipsey
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

7.  Assessing the Impact of De Novo Social Ties within Health Intervention Settings: New Questions for Health Behavior Intervention Research.

Authors:  Eric Tesdahl; Sabina B Gesell
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.689

8.  A comparison of health behaviors of women in centering pregnancy and traditional prenatal care.

Authors:  Kaylynn Shakespear; Phillip J Waite; Julie Gast
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2009-01-29

9.  CenteringPregnancy-Africa: a pilot of group antenatal care to address Millennium Development Goals.

Authors:  Crystal L Patil; Elizabeth T Abrams; Carrie Klima; Chrissie P N Kaponda; Sebalda C Leshabari; Susan C Vonderheid; Martha Kamanga; Kathleen F Norr
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.372

10.  Comparison of centering pregnancy to traditional care in Hispanic mothers.

Authors:  Bethany Robertson; Dawn M Aycock; Laura A Darnell
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-05-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.