Literature DB >> 29934842

Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS): first analysis on survival.

Kazuto Ito1,2, Shiro Saito3, Atsunori Yorozu4, Shinsuke Kojima5, Takashi Kikuchi5, Satoshi Higashide5, Manabu Aoki6, Hirofumi Koga7, Takefumi Satoh8,9, Toshio Ohashi10, Katsumasa Nakamura11, Norihisa Katayama12, Nobumichi Tanaka13, Masahiro Nakano14, Naoyuki Shigematsu10, Takushi Dokiya15, Masanori Fukushima5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Investigating oncological outcomes in patients registered in the Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS) in terms of biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) by the Phoenix and the newly developed J-POPS definitions, exploration of predictive factors for bRFS, and preliminary verification of pitfalls of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure definitions.
METHODS: Between July 2005 and June 2007, 2316 clinically localized patients underwent permanent seed implantation. The primary endpoint was bRFS. One of the secondary endpoints was overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: The median age was 69 and performance status was 0 in 99.1% of participants. The median biologically effective dose (BED) was about 180 Gy2. During a median follow-up of 60.0 months, 8.4 and 5.9% had PSA failure by the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions, respectively. The 5-year bRFSs based on the Phoenix and the J-POPS definitions were 89.1 and 91.6%, respectively. The 5-year OS was 97.3%. According to multivariate analyses, only age affected bRFS based on the Phoenix definition, whereas the risk group and BED independently affected bRFS based on the J-POPS definition. A spontaneous PSA decrease was seen in 91.1% of participants after PSA failure based on the Phoenix definition alone, but in only 22.2% after PSA failure based on the J-POPS definition alone.
CONCLUSION: The world's largest registration study, J-POPS, consisted of patients with longevity, and a highly quality-controlled BED resulted in excellent bRFS and OS. The high likelihood of PSA bounce by the Phoenix definition should be taken into account, especially in younger patients. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT00534196.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachytherapy; External beam radiation therapy; Iodine-125; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29934842     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1309-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  26 in total

1.  Biologically effective dose values for prostate brachytherapy: effects on PSA failure and posttreatment biopsy results.

Authors:  Richard G Stock; Nelson N Stone; Jamie A Cesaretti; Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  The PSA nadir that indicates potential cure after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  F A Critz; A K Levinson; W H Williams; D A Holladay; C T Holladay
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS).

Authors:  Shiro Saito; Kazuto Ito; Atsunori Yorozu; Manabu Aoki; Hirofumi Koga; Takefumi Satoh; Toshio Ohashi; Naoyuki Shigematsu; Shinichiro Maruo; Takashi Kikuchi; Shinsuke Kojima; Takushi Dokiya; Masanori Fukushima; Hidetoshi Yamanaka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Permanent interstitial low-dose-rate brachytherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer: a systematic review of randomised and nonrandomised controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Frank Peinemann; Ulrich Grouven; Carmen Bartel; Stefan Sauerland; Holger Borchers; Michael Pinkawa; Axel Heidenreich; Stefan Lange
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Long-term urinary, sexual, and rectal morbidity in patients treated with iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy followed up for a minimum of 5 years.

Authors:  Nelson N Stone; Richard G Stock
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Evaluating the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure after (125)I prostate brachytherapy: Can PSA kinetics distinguish PSA failures from PSA bounces?

Authors:  Anna Thompson; Mira Keyes; Tom Pickles; David Palma; Veronika Moravan; Ingrid Spadinger; Vincent Lapointe; W James Morris
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Prostate-specific antigen 'bounce' after permanent 125I-implant brachytherapy in Japanese men: a multi-institutional pooled analysis.

Authors:  Takefumi Satoh; Hiromichi Ishiyama; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Hideyasu Tsumura; Masashi Kitano; Kazushige Hayakawa; Shin Ebara; Yasutomo Nasu; Hiromi Kumon; Susumu Kanazawa; Kenta Miki; Shin Egawa; Manabu Aoki; Kazuhito Toya; Atsushi Yorozu; Hirohiko Nagata; Shiro Saito; Shiro Baba
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Androgen suppression and radiation vs radiation alone for prostate cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Anthony V D'Amico; Ming-Hui Chen; Andrew A Renshaw; Marian Loffredo; Philip W Kantoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Probability of late rectal morbidity in 125I prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Frank M Waterman; Adam P Dicker
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Seed migration after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy by using loose seeds: Japanese prostate cancer outcome study of permanent iodine-125 seed implantation (J-POPS) multi-institutional cohort study.

Authors:  Masahiro Nakano; Atsunori Yorozu; Shiro Saito; Akitomo Sugawara; Shinichiroh Maruo; Shinsuke Kojima; Takashi Kikuchi; Masanori Fukushima; Takushi Dokiya; Hidetoshi Yamanaka
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  5 in total

1.  Ischemic proctitis after low-dose-rate brachytherapy using hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ren Toriumi; Hiroshi Yaegashi; Takayuki Sakurai; Shigeyuki Takamatsu; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Kouji Izumi; Yoshifumi Kadono; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 2.  Stereotactic Radiation Therapy versus Brachytherapy: Relative Strengths of Two Highly Efficient Options for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Manon Kissel; Gilles Créhange; Pierre Graff
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Five-year effectiveness of low-dose-rate brachytherapy: comparisons with nomogram predictions in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer presenting significant control of intra- and periprostatic disease.

Authors:  Jörg S Zimmermann; Rudolf Osieka; Thorsten Bruns; Helge Hollberg; Bastian Wiechmann; Olaf Netzbandt; Jörg Sablotny; Michael Malade; Matthias Heitz; Fritz Bernhardt; Jörg Tiemann; Marc Wilkens; Tom Brüske; Utz Welker; Volker Heinemann; Petra Zimmermann; Salvador Fernandez de la Maza; Dietrich Pfeiffer; Prof Roland Tauber; Dorothea Thomas; Christos Moustakis
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-08-31

4.  Whole-gland salvage treatment for recurrent prostate cancer after initial definitive radiotherapy: A case series of 125I brachytherapy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shinya Sutani; Atsunori Yorozu; Kazuhito Toya; Toru Nishiyama; Choichiro Ozu; Yasuto Yagi; Ken Nakamura; Shiro Saito
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-06-28

5.  Clinical outcomes of iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution review in Japan.

Authors:  Makoto Nakiri; Naoyuki Ogasawara; Hirofumi Kurose; Kosuke Ueda; Katsuaki Chikui; Kiyoaki Nishihara; Kazuhisa Ejima; Keiichiro Uemura; Kenta Murotani; Koichiro Muraki; Chikayuki Hattori; Etsuyo Ogo; Yoshitaka Morimatsu; Tatsuya Ishitake; Tsukasa Igawa
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-04-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.