Literature DB >> 20133083

Evaluating the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure after (125)I prostate brachytherapy: Can PSA kinetics distinguish PSA failures from PSA bounces?

Anna Thompson1, Mira Keyes, Tom Pickles, David Palma, Veronika Moravan, Ingrid Spadinger, Vincent Lapointe, W James Morris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics of PSA failure (PSAf) and PSA bounce (PSAb) after permanent (125)I prostate brachytherapy (PB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included 1,006 consecutive low and "low tier" intermediate-risk patients treated with (125)I PB, with a potential minimum follow-up of 4 years. Patients who met the Phoenix definition of biochemical failure (nadir + 2 ng/mL(-1)) were identified. If the PSA subsequently fell to ≤0.5 ng/mL(-1)without intervention, this was considered a PSAb. All others were scored as true PSAf. Patient, tumor and dosimetric characteristics were compared between groups using the chi-square test and analysis of variance to evaluate factors associated with PSAf or PSAb.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 54 months. Of the 1,006 men, 57 patients triggered the Phoenix definition of PSA failure, 32 (56%) were true PSAf, and 25 PSAb (44%). The median time to trigger nadir + 2 was 20.6 months (range, 6-36) vs. 49 mo (range, 12-83) for PSAb vs. PSAf groups (p < 0.001). The PSAb patients were significantly younger (p < 0.0001), had shorter time to reach the nadir (median 6 vs. 11.5 months, p = 0.001) and had a shorter PSA doubling time (p = 0.05). Men younger than age 70 who trigger nadir +2 PSA failure within 38 months of implant have an 80% likelihood of having PSAb and 20% chance of PSAf.
CONCLUSIONS: With adequate follow-up, 44% of PSA failures by the Phoenix definition in our cohort were found to be benign PSA bounces. Our study reinforces the need for adequate follow-up when reporting PB PSA outcomes, to ensure accurate estimates of treatment efficacy and to avoid unnecessary secondary interventions. 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20133083     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

Review 1.  Low-dose rate brachytherapy for patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  George Rodrigues; Xiaomei Yao; D Andrew Loblaw; Michael Brundage; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  External validation of the ProCaRS nomograms and comparison of existing risk-stratification tools for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  David Tiberi; George Rodrigues; Tom Pickles; Jim Morris; Juanita Crook; Andre-Guy Martin; Fabio Cury; Charles Catton; Himu Lukka; Andrew Warner; Daniel Taussky
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Francesca V Mertan; Matthew D Greer; Sam Borofsky; Ismail M Kabakus; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-06

4.  Nationwide Japanese Prostate Cancer Outcome Study of Permanent Iodine-125 Seed Implantation (J-POPS): first analysis on survival.

Authors:  Kazuto Ito; Shiro Saito; Atsunori Yorozu; Shinsuke Kojima; Takashi Kikuchi; Satoshi Higashide; Manabu Aoki; Hirofumi Koga; Takefumi Satoh; Toshio Ohashi; Katsumasa Nakamura; Norihisa Katayama; Nobumichi Tanaka; Masahiro Nakano; Naoyuki Shigematsu; Takushi Dokiya; Masanori Fukushima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Permanent 125I-seed prostate brachytherapy: early prostate specific antigen value as a predictor of PSA bounce occurrence.

Authors:  Renaud Mazeron; Agathe Bajard; Xavier Montbarbon; Frédéric Gassa; Claude Malet; François Rocher; Sébastien Clippe; Gabriel Bringeon; Olivier Desmettre; Pascal Pommier
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Development of ProCaRS Clinical Nomograms for Biochemical Failure-free Survival Following Either Low-Dose Rate Brachytherapy or Conventionally Fractionated External Beam Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Warner; Tom Pickles; Juanita Crook; Andre-Guy Martin; Luis Souhami; Charles Catton; Himu Lukka; George Rodrigues
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-06-11

7.  Distinguishing prostate-specific antigen bounces from biochemical failure after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Cian Hackett; Sunita Ghosh; Ron Sloboda; Kevin Martell; Lanna Lan; Nadeem Pervez; John Pedersen; Don Yee; Albert Murtha; John Amanie; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-09-05

8.  Parameters predicting for prostate specific antigen response rates at one year post low-dose-rate intraoperative prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Kevin Martell; Tyler Meyer; Michael Sia; Steve Angyalfi; Siraj Husain
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-04-13

9.  Comparison of biochemical failure rates between permanent prostate brachytherapy and radical retropubic prostatectomy as a function of posttherapy PSA nadir plus 'X'.

Authors:  Kamran A Ahmed; Brian J Davis; Lance A Mynderse; Jeffrey M Slezak; Eric J Bergstralh; Torrence M Wilson; C Richard Choo
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Time to PSA rise differentiates the PSA bounce after HDR and LDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wojciech Burchardt; Janusz Skowronek
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.