Zachary D W Dezman1, David A Gorelick2, Carl A Soderstrom3. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: zdezman@som.umaryland.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: dgorelick@mprc.umaryland.edu. 3. National Study Center for Trauma and Emergency Medical Systems, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: carlsoder@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-alcohol substance use disorders (drug use disorders [DUDs]) are common in trauma patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the test characteristics of a 4-item drug CAGE questionnaire to detect DUDs in a cohort of adult trauma inpatients. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional cohort of 1,115 adult patients admitted directly to a level-one trauma center between September, 1994 and November, 1996. All participants underwent both a 4-item drug CAGE questionnaire and the substance use disorder section of a structured psychiatric diagnostic clinical interview (SCID) (DSM-IIIR criteria), administered by staff unaware of their clinical status. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), positive (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR-), and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated for each individual question and the overall questionnaire, using SCID-generated DUD diagnoses as the standard. Performance characteristics of the screen were also compared across selected sociodemographic, injury mechanism, and diagnostic sub-groups. RESULTS: Subjects with DUDs were common (n = 349, 31.3%), including cannabis (n = 203, 18.2%), cocaine (n = 199, 17.8%), and opioids (n = 156, 14.0%). The screen performed well overall (AUC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.91) and across subgroups based on age, sex, race, marriage status, income, education, employment status, mechanism of injury, and current/past DUD status (AUCs 0.75-1.00). Answering any one question in the affirmative had a sensitivity = 83.4% (95% CI: 79.1-87.1), specificity = 92.3% (95% CI: 90.2-94.1), PPV = 83.1%, LR+ = 10.8. CONCLUSIONS: The 4-item drug CAGE and its individual questions had good-to-excellent ability to detect DUDs in this adult trauma inpatient population, suggesting its usefulness as a screening tool.
BACKGROUND: Non-alcohol substance use disorders (drug use disorders [DUDs]) are common in traumapatients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the test characteristics of a 4-item drug CAGE questionnaire to detect DUDs in a cohort of adult trauma inpatients. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional cohort of 1,115 adult patients admitted directly to a level-one trauma center between September, 1994 and November, 1996. All participants underwent both a 4-item drug CAGE questionnaire and the substance use disorder section of a structured psychiatric diagnostic clinical interview (SCID) (DSM-IIIR criteria), administered by staff unaware of their clinical status. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV), positive (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR-), and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated for each individual question and the overall questionnaire, using SCID-generated DUD diagnoses as the standard. Performance characteristics of the screen were also compared across selected sociodemographic, injury mechanism, and diagnostic sub-groups. RESULTS: Subjects with DUDs were common (n = 349, 31.3%), including cannabis (n = 203, 18.2%), cocaine (n = 199, 17.8%), and opioids (n = 156, 14.0%). The screen performed well overall (AUC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.91) and across subgroups based on age, sex, race, marriage status, income, education, employment status, mechanism of injury, and current/past DUD status (AUCs 0.75-1.00). Answering any one question in the affirmative had a sensitivity = 83.4% (95% CI: 79.1-87.1), specificity = 92.3% (95% CI: 90.2-94.1), PPV = 83.1%, LR+ = 10.8. CONCLUSIONS: The 4-item drug CAGE and its individual questions had good-to-excellent ability to detect DUDs in this adult trauma inpatient population, suggesting its usefulness as a screening tool.
Authors: Gabrielle G Grant; Audrey E Wolfe; Catherine R Thorpe; Nicole S Gibran; Gretchen J Carrougher; Shelley A Wiechman; Radha Holavanahalli; Frederick J Stoddard; Robert L Sheridan; Lewis E Kazis; Jeffrey C Schneider; Colleen M Ryan Journal: Burns Date: 2019-12-31 Impact factor: 2.609
Authors: Lynne Benavides; Vivian Shie; Brennan Yee; Miranda Yelvington; Laura C Simko; Audrey E Wolfe; Kara McMullen; Janelle Epp; Ingrid Parry; Rachel Shon; Radha Holavanahalli; David Herndon; Marta Rosenberg; Laura Rosenberg; Walter Meyer; Nicole Gibran; Shelley Wiechman; Colleen M Ryan; Jeffrey C Schneider Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 1.819