Jennifer R Bail1, Andrew D Frugé2, Mallory G Cases3, Jennifer F De Los Santos4, Julie L Locher5, Kerry P Smith6, Alan B Cantor7, Harvey J Cohen8, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried1. 1. Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 2. Department of Nutrition, Dietetics, and Hospitality Management, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 6. Alabama Cooperative Extension System, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. 7. Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama. 8. Deparment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current study assessed the feasibility of a mentored home-based vegetable gardening intervention and examined changes in health-related outcomes among breast cancer survivors (BCS). METHODS: BCS were randomized to either a year-long vegetable gardening intervention to begin immediately or a wait-list control. Master Gardeners mentored participants in planning, planting, and maintaining 3 seasonal gardens over the course of 1 year. Participant accrual, retention, and satisfaction rates of ≥80% served as feasibility (primary outcome) benchmarks. Secondary outcomes (ie, vegetable consumption, physical activity, performance and function, anthropometrics, biomarkers, and health-related quality of life) were collected at baseline and post-intervention (1-year follow-up) using subjective and objective measures. RESULTS: The trial surpassed all feasibility benchmarks at 82% of targeted accrual, 95% retention, and 100% satisfaction (ie, experience ratings of "good to excellent" and willingness to "do it again"). Compared with the controls, intervention participants reported significantly greater improvements in moderate physical activity (+14 vs -17 minutes/week) and demonstrated improvements in the 2-Minute Step Test (+22 vs + 10 steps), and Arm Curl (+2.7 vs + 0.1 repetitions) (P values < .05). A trend toward improved vegetable consumption was observed (+0.9 vs + 0.2 servings/day; P = .06). Approximately 86% of participants were continuing to garden at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that a mentored, home-based vegetable gardening intervention is feasible and offers an integrative and durable approach with which to improve health behaviors and outcomes among BCS. Harvest for Health led to the establishment of a group of trained Master Gardeners and gave rise to local and global community-based programs. Larger studies are needed to confirm the results presented herein and to define applicability across broader populations of survivors.
BACKGROUND: The current study assessed the feasibility of a mentored home-based vegetable gardening intervention and examined changes in health-related outcomes among breast cancer survivors (BCS). METHODS: BCS were randomized to either a year-long vegetable gardening intervention to begin immediately or a wait-list control. Master Gardeners mentored participants in planning, planting, and maintaining 3 seasonal gardens over the course of 1 year. Participant accrual, retention, and satisfaction rates of ≥80% served as feasibility (primary outcome) benchmarks. Secondary outcomes (ie, vegetable consumption, physical activity, performance and function, anthropometrics, biomarkers, and health-related quality of life) were collected at baseline and post-intervention (1-year follow-up) using subjective and objective measures. RESULTS: The trial surpassed all feasibility benchmarks at 82% of targeted accrual, 95% retention, and 100% satisfaction (ie, experience ratings of "good to excellent" and willingness to "do it again"). Compared with the controls, intervention participants reported significantly greater improvements in moderate physical activity (+14 vs -17 minutes/week) and demonstrated improvements in the 2-Minute Step Test (+22 vs + 10 steps), and Arm Curl (+2.7 vs + 0.1 repetitions) (P values < .05). A trend toward improved vegetable consumption was observed (+0.9 vs + 0.2 servings/day; P = .06). Approximately 86% of participants were continuing to garden at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that a mentored, home-based vegetable gardening intervention is feasible and offers an integrative and durable approach with which to improve health behaviors and outcomes among BCS. Harvest for Health led to the establishment of a group of trained Master Gardeners and gave rise to local and global community-based programs. Larger studies are needed to confirm the results presented herein and to define applicability across broader populations of survivors.
Authors: Cheryl L Rock; Colleen Doyle; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Kerry S Courneya; Anna L Schwartz; Elisa V Bandera; Kathryn K Hamilton; Barbara Grant; Marji McCullough; Tim Byers; Ted Gansler Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Angela D Liese; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Amy F Subar; Stephanie M George; Brook E Harmon; Marian L Neuhouser; Carol J Boushey; TusaRebecca E Schap; Jill Reedy Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Jonathan Kingsley; Lucy Diekmann; Monika H Egerer; Brenda B Lin; Alessandro Ossola; Pauline Marsh Journal: Health Place Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 4.931
Authors: Alyssa W Beavers; Ashley Atkinson; Lauren M Varvatos; Mary Connolly; Katherine Alaimo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-28 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Mallory G Cases; Cindy K Blair; Peter S Hendricks; Kerry Smith; Scott Snyder; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 4.135