Literature DB >> 29929892

Influence of follower load application on moment-rotation parameters and intradiscal pressure in the cervical spine.

Kevin M Bell1, Yiguo Yan2, Robert A Hartman3, Joon Y Lee3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to implement a follower load (FL) device within a robotic (universal force-moment sensor) testing system and utilize the system to explore the effect of FL on multi-segment cervical spine moment-rotation parameters and intradiscal pressure (IDP) at C45 and C56. Twelve fresh-frozen human cervical specimens (C3-C7) were biomechanically tested in a robotic testing system to a pure moment target of 2.0 Nm for flexion and extension (FE) with no compression and with 100 N of FL. Application of FL was accomplished by loading the specimens with bilateral cables passing through cable guides inserted into the vertebral bodies and attached to load controlled linear actuators. FL significantly increased neutral zone (NZ) stiffness and NZ width but resulted in no change in the range of motion (ROM) or elastic zone stiffness. C45 and C56 IDP measured in the neutral position were significantly increased with application of FL. The change in IDP with increasing flexion rotation was not significantly affected by the application of FL, whereas the change in IDP with increasing extension rotation was significantly reduced by the application of FL. Application of FL did not appear to affect the specimen's quantity of motion (ROM) but did affect the quality (the shape of the curve). Regarding IDP, the effects of adding FL compression approximates the effect of the patient going from supine to a seated position (FL compression increased the IDP in the neutral position). The change in IDP with increasing flexion rotation was not affected by the application of FL, but the change in IDP with increasing extension rotation was, however, significantly reduced by the application of FL.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spine; Elastic zone; Follower load; Intradiscal pressure; Neutral zone; Robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29929892     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Unique biomechanical signatures of Bryan, Prodisc C, and Prestige LP cervical disc replacements: a finite element modelling study.

Authors:  Hoon Choi; Yuvaraj Purushothaman; Jamie Baisden; Narayan Yoganandan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical Study of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Devices Using Finite Element Modeling.

Authors:  Narayan Yoganandan; Yuvaraj Purushothaman; Hoon Choi; Jamie Baisden; Deepak Rajasekaran; Anjishnu Banerjee; Davidson Jebaseelan; Shekar Kurpad
Journal:  J Eng Sci Med Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-02-22

3.  Comparative Analysis of the Biomechanical Characteristics After Different Minimally Invasive Surgeries for Cervical Spondylopathy: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Tao He; Jun Zhang; Tong Yu; Jiuping Wu; Tianyang Yuan; Rui Liu; Zhihe Yun; Haorui Du; Le Qi; Junyan An; Wu Xue; Xinyu Nie; Qinyi Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 4.  In Vitro Studies for Investigating Creep of Intervertebral Discs under Axial Compression: A Review of Testing Environment and Results.

Authors:  Mengying Yang; Dingding Xiang; Song Wang; Weiqiang Liu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  In Silico Meta-Analysis of Boundary Conditions for Experimental Tests on the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Simone Borrelli; Giovanni Putame; Giulia Pascoletti; Mara Terzini; Elisabetta M Zanetti
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Assessing the biofidelity of in vitro biomechanical testing of the human cervical spine.

Authors:  Richard A Wawrose; Forbes E Howington; Clarissa M LeVasseur; Clair N Smith; Brandon K Couch; Jeremy D Shaw; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; Charity G Patterson; William J Anderst; Kevin M Bell
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.