| Literature DB >> 29928717 |
Zhimin Su1, Caiting Dong2, Ping Li3,4, Hongxia Deng5, Yuhan Gong6, Shiyong Zhong7, Min Wu8, Yuhua Ruan3, Guangming Qin2, Wen Yang2, Yiming Shao3,4, Michael Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As a response to a severe HIV epidemic in the Liangshan Prefecture, one of the worst in China, population based HIV interventions, including two population-wide HIV screening, have been carried out since 2005 at two townships in a remote mountainous region of Liangshan. The objective of our mathematical modeling study is to assess the temporal dynamics of the HIV epidemic in the two townships based on the data collected in the study area during the period 2005-2010.Entities:
Keywords: AIDS, acquired immune deficiency syndrome; ART, anti-retroviral therapy; HIV epidemiology; HIV testing and treatment; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; LHS, Latin Hypercube sampling; MCMC, Markov chain Monte Carlo; PLHIV, people living with HIV/AIDS; mathematical modeling
Year: 2016 PMID: 29928717 PMCID: PMC5963326 DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2016.05.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Model ISSN: 2468-0427
Fig. 1Transfer diagram of the HIV transmission model.
Values and confidence intervals for model parameters.
| Parameter | Description | Best-fit value | 95% CI | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission rate for compartment | 0.214 | [0.184, 0.237] | Fitting | |
| Ratio of transmission rates for | 0.75 | [0.5, 1] | ( | |
| Ratio of transmission rates for T and | 0.1 | [0.05, 0.15] | ( | |
| Death rate for compartment | 0.007 | [0.00503, 0.0089] | Fitting | |
| Death rate for compartment | 0.063 | [0.045, 0.083] | ( | |
| Death rate for compartment | 0.0427 | [0.032, 0.055] | Data | |
| Death rate for compartment | 0.0652 | [0.051, 0.077] | Data | |
| Treatment drop-out rate | 0.0169 | [0.0108, 0.025] | Data | |
| Undiagnosed HIV positive population in 2005 | 813 | [651, 934] | Fitting | |
| Influx of susceptibles by birth and emigration | 276 | [199, 354] | Fitting | |
| Time-dependent diagnosis rate | Fitting | |||
| Time-dependent treatment enrollment rate | Data | |||
| R2 | Goodness of Fitting | 0.97 | ||
Fig. 2Fitting to model outcome to data. Lines graphs are model outcomes, and crosses are data points.
Fig. 3Model estimation from 2005 to 2015. Lines are baseline model estimations and vertical bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 4Results of sensitivity analysis showing the 5 most sensitive parameter for (a) HIV new infections in 2006 and (b) HIV new infections in 2010 with respect to model parameters.
Fig. 5Accumulative HIV new infection averted number (triangle) and percentage (circle) due to screening interventions.