Literature DB >> 29928438

The first thermic treatment predicts following chemoradiation response with concurrent thermal therapy for the treatment of rectal cancer.

Hisanori Shoji1, Masahiko Motegi1, Kiyotaka Osawa1, Takayuki Asao2, Hiroyuki Kuwano3, Takeo Takahashi4, Kyoji Ogoshi5.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate whether the neoadjuvant chemoradiation response with concurrent thermal therapy for the treatment of rectal cancer can be predicted following the first thermic treatment. Eighty patients with primary rectal adenocarcinoma (≤12 cm from the anal verge) were included in this study. Fifty-four received surgery and pathological response was evaluated. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was administered conventionally once daily 5 times/week. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy consisted of 50 Gy delivered to the planning target volume in 25 fractions. Concurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy was delivered in 5-day courses. Capecitabine was administered orally at 1,700 mg/m2/day for 5 days/week. Thermic treatment was performed using the Thermotron-RF 8 and administered once/week for 5 weeks with 50 min irradiation. Patients with a gross tumor volume (GTV) ≤32 cm3 and a radiofrequency (RF) output difference (RO difference) ≥77 Watt/min exhibited pathological complete response (pCR) and CR rates of 50 and 75%, respectively. Those with a GTV ≥80 cm3 and a RO difference ≥77 Watt/min exhibited pCR and CR rates of 42.9 and 42.9%, respectively. The changes in the skin temperature during RF treatment in patients with pCR with a RO difference ≥77 Watt/min increased significantly compared with those of other outcomes, and progressive disease. These data suggest a strategy for predicting which patients will respond best following the first thermic treatment. The results identified that the group of patients with a GTV ≤32 cm3 and a RO difference ≥77 Watt/min (outputable/heatable patients) may respond best.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemoradiotherapy; dose-volume histograms; prediction of treatment response; radiofrequency thermal therapy; rectal cancer

Year:  2018        PMID: 29928438      PMCID: PMC6006393          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  29 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Radiogenomics helps to achieve personalized therapy by evaluating patient responses to radiation treatment.

Authors:  Zhen Guo; Yan Shu; Honghao Zhou; Wei Zhang; Hui Wang
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  International consensus guidelines on Clinical Target Volume delineation in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Vincenzo Valentini; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Brunella Barbaro; Giuditta Chiloiro; Claudio Coco; Prajnan Das; Francesco Fanfani; Ines Joye; Lisa Kachnic; Philippe Maingon; Corrie Marijnen; Samuel Ngan; Karin Haustermans
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Preoperative chemoradiation in rectal cancer: Retrospective comparison between capecitabine and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  Rinat Yerushalmi; Efraim Idelevich; Ygael Dror; Salomon M Stemmer; Arie Figer; Aaron Sulkes; Baruch Brenner; David Loven; Zeev Dreznik; Israel Nudelman; Adi Shani; Eyal Fenig
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.

Authors:  Rolf Sauer; Torsten Liersch; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Werner Hohenberger; Clemens Hess; Heinz Becker; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Marie-Therese Villanueva; Helmut Witzigmann; Christian Wittekind; Tim Beissbarth; Claus Rödel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03.

Authors:  Mark S Roh; Linda H Colangelo; Michael J O'Connell; Greg Yothers; Melvin Deutsch; Carmen J Allegra; Morton S Kahlenberg; Luis Baez-Diaz; Carol S Ursiny; Nicholas J Petrelli; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Pathological complete response and sphincter-sparing surgery after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with regional hyperthermia for locally advanced rectal cancer compared with radiochemotherapy alone.

Authors:  Christopher Schroeder; Cihan Gani; Ulf Lamprecht; Claus Hann von Weyhern; Martin Weinmann; Michael Bamberg; Bernhard Berger
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.914

8.  The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Koen C M J Peeters; Corrie A M Marijnen; Iris D Nagtegaal; Elma Klein Kranenbarg; Hein Putter; Theo Wiggers; Harm Rutten; Lars Pahlman; Bengt Glimelius; Jan Willem Leer; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Radiofrequency thermal treatment with chemoradiotherapy for advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hisanori Shoji; Masahiko Motegi; Kiyotaka Osawa; Noriyuki Okonogi; Atsushi Okazaki; Yoshitaka Andou; Takayuki Asao; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Takeo Takahashi; Kyoji Ogoshi
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  A phase II trial of neoadjuvant IMRT-based chemoradiotherapy followed by one cycle of capecitabine for stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ji Zhu; Weilie Gu; Peng Lian; Weiqi Sheng; Gang Cai; Debing Shi; Sanjun Cai; Zhen Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.