| Literature DB >> 29928331 |
Su-Jun Gao1, Lei Chen1, Wei Lu1, Li Zhang1, Lu Wang1, Hai-Hang Zhu1.
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important regulators of tumor formation, progression and metastasis. The present study characterized a novel miRNA (miR)-888, as a potent oncomiR in human colorectal cancer (CRC). The clinicopathological investigation on 126 cases of CRC patients demonstrated that the expression level of miR-888 was significantly upregulated in tumors compared with adjacent healthy tissue, and was associated with tumor stage and histological differentiation. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test demonstrated that CRC patients with increased miR-888 expression exhibited a decreased overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with patients with low miR-888 expression. Further univariate and multivariate analyses identified miR-888 as an independent prognostic factor for poor survival outcome in CRC patients. To determine the biological role of miR-888 in human CRC, in vitro Cell Counting kit-8, wound healing and transwell assays were performed and demonstrated that miR-888 contributed greatly to CRC cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis. Furthermore, potential targets of miR-888 were investigated using a luciferase reporter assay, followed by polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis. The findings revealed that miR-888 directly bound to the 3'-untranslated region of mothers against decapentaplegic-4 and thus inhibited its expression and promoted the tumor growth factor-1-induced cancer metastasis signaling. The results of the present study identified miR-888 as an oncogenic miRNA in CRC and provide a foundation for promising research in the future regarding this predictive and prognostic biomarker.Entities:
Keywords: Smad4; colorectal cancer; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; metastasis; miR-888; prognosis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29928331 PMCID: PMC6004656 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Correlation between clinicopathological parameters and miR-888 expression in patients with colorectal cancer.
| miR-888 expression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | No. (%) | High n=93 (%) | Low n=33 (%) | Pa |
| Age | 0.453 | |||
| <60 | 60 (47.6) | 44 (47.3) | 16 (48.5) | |
| ≥60 | 66 (52.4) | 49 (52.7) | 17 (51.5) | |
| Sex | 0.251 | |||
| Male | 71 (56.3) | 53 (57.0) | 18 (54.5) | |
| Female | 55 (43.7) | 40 (43.0) | 15 (45.5) | |
| Tumor location | 0.235 | |||
| Left | 79 (62.7) | 59 (63.4) | 20 (60.6) | |
| Transverse | 13 (10.3) | 9 (9.7) | 4 (12.1) | |
| Right | 34 (27.0) | 25 (26.9) | 9 (27.3) | |
| pT status | 0.009[ | |||
| T1/T2 | 28 (22.2) | 14 (15.1) | 14 (42.4) | |
| T3/T4 | 98 (77.8) | 79 (84.9) | 19 (57.6) | |
| pN status | 0.031[ | |||
| Absent | 72 (57.1) | 48 (51.6) | 24 (72.7) | |
| Present | 54 (42.9) | 45 (48.4) | 9 (27.3) | |
| pMstatus | 0.018[ | |||
| Absent | 116 (92.1) | 84 (90.3) | 32 (97.0) | |
| Present | 10 (7.9) | 9 (9.7) | 1 (3.0) | |
| AJCC stage | 0.042[ | |||
| I/II | 71 (56.3) | 48 (51.6) | 23 (69.7) | |
| III/IV | 55 (43.7) | 45 (48.4) | 10 (30.3) | |
| Differentiation | 0.005[ | |||
| Well | 27 (21.4) | 13 (14.0) | 14 (42.4) | |
| Moderate | 78 (61.9) | 60 (64.5) | 18 (54.5) | |
| Poor | 21 (16.7) | 20 (21.5) | 1 (3.0) | |
Statistically significant.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with colorectal cancer.
| Overall survival univariate | OS multivariate | Disease-free survival univariate | DFS multivariate | |||||
| HR (95%CI) | p[ | HR (95%CI) | p[ | HR (95%CI) | p[ | HR (95%CI) | P[ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-888 | ||||||||
| Low | – | – | – | – | ||||
| High | 5.42 (3.69, 11.55) | 0.005[ | 4.89 (2.44, 9.08) | 0.008[ | 6.01 (2.85, 11.75) | 0.018[ | 5.37 (2.96, 10.03) | 0.011[ |
| Age | ||||||||
| <60 | – | – | – | |||||
| ≥60 | 1.72 (1.11, 2.93) | 0.290 | 1.56 (1.07, 2.67) | 0.345 | ||||
| Sex | ||||||||
| Female | – | – | ||||||
| Male | 1.42 (1.02, 1.99) | 0.284 | 1.28 (0.96, 1.85) | 0.368 | ||||
| Tumor location | ||||||||
| Transverse | – | – | ||||||
| Right | 0.85 (0.55, 1.34) | 0.523 | 0.81 (0.49, 1.28) | 0.673 | ||||
| Left | 1.16 (0.91, 1.66) | 0.301 | 1.07 (0.85, 1.50) | 0.455 | ||||
| pT status | ||||||||
| T1/T2 | – | – | – | – | ||||
| T3/T4 | 2.60 (1.17, 4.36) | 0.025[ | 2.11 (1.01, 4.22) | 0.036[ | 2.28 (1.25, 4.64) | 0.017[ | 1.98 (1.12, 3.87) | 0.024[ |
| pN status | ||||||||
| Absent | – | – | – | – | ||||
| Present | 3.18 (2.03,7.67) | 0.003[ | 2.88 (1.21,4.70) | <0.001[ | 3.03 (2.43, 7.07) | 0.004[ | 2.78 (1.27, 5.45) | 0.011[ |
| pM status | ||||||||
| Absent | – | – | – | – | ||||
| Present | 5.21 (2.42,10.61) | 0.023[ | 4.98 (2.33,9.75) | 0.037[ | 5.75 (2.21,10.87) | 0.028[ | 5.18 (2.08,9.15) | 0.033[ |
| AJCC stage | ||||||||
| I/II | – | – | – | – | ||||
| III/IV | 4.12 (2.37,8.86) | 0.009[ | 3.82 (1.55,6.71) | 0.011[ | 4.92 (2.49,9.19) | 0.024[ | 3.37 (1.43, 6.77) | 0.031[ |
| Differentiation | ||||||||
| Well | – | – | – | – | ||||
| Moderate | 3.59 (1.02, 6.12) | 0.023[ | 2.54 (1.35,4.71) | 0.017[ | 3.03 (1.25, 5.66) | 0.008[ | 2.69 (1.09, 4.96) | 0.013[ |
| Poor | 5.45 (2.22,12.34) | <0.001[ | 4.76 (2.29,11.23) | 0.004[ | 5.75 (2.41,11.63) | 0.019[ | 5.08 (2.83, 10.21) | 0.005[ |
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Statistically significant.
Primers used in this study
| Oligo | Sequence | |
|---|---|---|
| Smad4 | 5′-CGGACATTACTGGCCTGTTC-3′ | |
| (Foward) | ||
| Smad4 | 5′-TAGGGCAGCTTGAAGGAAACC-3′ | |
| (Reverse) | ||
| E-cadherin | 5′-GAAGTGTCCGAGGACTTTGG-3′ | |
| (Forward) | ||
| E-cadherin | 5′-CAGTGTCTCTCCAAATCCGATA-3′ | |
| (Reverse) | ||
| TGF-β1 | 5′-GAGGCGGTGCTCGCTTTGTA-3′ | |
| (Forward) | ||
| TGF-β1 | 5′-GCACTGCTTCCCGAATGTCTG-3′ | |
| (Reverse) | ||
| Snail | 5′-GTCCTTGCTCCACAAACACCA-3′ | |
| (Forward) | ||
| Snail | 5′-CTGCCTTCCATCAGCCATCT-3′ | |
| (Reverse) | ||
| Twist | 5′-GTCCGCAGTCTTACGAGGAG-3′ | |
| (Forward) | ||
| Twist | 5′-CCAGCTTGAGGGTCTGAATC-3′ | |
| (Reverse) | ||
| N-cadherin | 5′-TTGGTTTGGGGAGGGAGA-3′ | |
| (Forward) | ||
| N-cadherin | 5′-CTGGGGTCAGAGGTGTATCATTT-3′ | |
| (Reverse) | ||
| GAPDH | 5′-ACAGTCAGCCGCATCTTCTT-3′ | |
| (Forward) | ||
| GAPDH | 5′-ACGACCAAATCCGTTGACTC-3′ | |
| (Reverse) | ||
| miR-888 | 5′-ATGTGGCAGATCCCACAGGAGTTT-3′ | |
| (Forward) | ||
| miR-888 | 5′-ACTGGGTTTGACTTCGTAGCCCTT-3′ | |
| (Reverse) | ||
| U6 (Forward) | 5′-CTGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′ | |
| U6 (Reverse) | 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′ |
Figure 1.miR-888 expression is increased in human colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues and is closely correlated with patients' clinicopathological factors. (A) RT-PCR analysis revealed that the level of miR-888 was increased in tumor tissues compared with the adjacent normal tissues. (B) miR-888 expression was significantly higher in metastatic tumors than in non-metastatic tumors. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. (C) In situ hybridization (ISH) analysis of miR-888 expression in 126 cases of CRC and normal colon tissues. Representative images of miR-888 low expression in normal colon tissues (1) and well-differentiated CRC tissues (2); and miR-888 high expression in moderately-differentiated (3) and poorly-differentiated (4) CRC tissues. Scale bar, 100 µm.
Figure 2.Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank t test for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with high/low expressions of miR-888. (A) The overall survival (OS) rates of CRC patients with low/high Bma1 expression. (B) The disease-free survival (DFS) rates of patients with low/high Bmal1 expression. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Figure 3.miR-888 promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells in vitro. (A) RT-PCR verification of the transfection efficiencies of miR-888 in human HEK 293 cells and SW620 cells. U6 snRNA was used as an internal control. (B) CCK-8 analysis of cell proliferation in control SW620 cells and cells transfected with miR-888 expression vectors or the empty controls. (C) Wound healing analysis of SW620 cell migration. (D) Transwell analysis of SW620 cell invasion. Original magnification, ×200. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 4.miR-888 directly targets the Smad4 3′-UTR and regulates the TGF-β1/Smad-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) signaling. (A) The complementary sequences between the position 1349–1369 of the wild-type or mutant human Smad4 3′-UTR and miR-888. (B, C) Dual luciferase reporter analysis showed the direct binding of miR-888 on Smad4 3′-UTR. HEK 293 cells (B) and SW620 cells (C) were respectively co-transfected with miR-888 or empty controls and the luciferase reporter construct containing the wild-type or mutant Smad4 3′-UTR. For each experiment, the results were normalized to the luciferase activity detected in the cells transfected with the empty vectors. ***P<0.001. (D, E) RT-PCR and western blot analyses of the effects of miR-888 on Smad4 expression in HEK 293 cells (D) and SW620 cells (E). GAPDH and β-actin were respectively used as internal controls for PCR analysis and western blotting. ***P<0.001. (F) Effects of miR-888 on the expression of key factors in the TGF-β1-mediated EMT signaling pathway. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.