| Literature DB >> 29927974 |
Prakash Kumar Sahoo1, Santosh K Panda1,2, Ashok Kumar Satapathy1, Sanghamitra Pati1.
Abstract
Lymphatic filariasis is a complex parasitic disease having a spectrum of clinical parameters which are critical in deciding the severity of the pathogenesis. Individuals residing in the endemic areas are categorized into different clinical groups such as: EC (endemic controls-free of disease and infection), AS (asymptomatic carriers- free of disease but carries both antigens and microfilaria (Mf) in circulation), CR (cryptic-free of disease and Mf but having circulatory antigen) and CH (chronic-having manifestations of elephantiasis and hydrocele). The immune response to the parasitic infection is well studied, whereas the protective mechanism explaining the fate of antigenemia and filaremia between AS and CR group remains unexplained. Increased anti-Mf antibodies have been implicated for Mf clearance in experimental infection models whereas its role in clinical filariasis is not known. Here, we followed up two groups of 24 and 33 CR cases for 18 and 36 months respectively and analyzed both the clinical parameters and the anti-filarial antibody response. The humoral response to both whole filarial antigen and Mf antigens as well as recombinant active parasitic antigens was significantly higher in CR cases than AS individuals, whereas the clinical parameters remain unchanged. This study made insights into the protective immune mechanism responsible for the clearance of Mf from circulation in CR individuals.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29927974 PMCID: PMC6013016 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Mf status of cryptic individuals followed up for 18 and 36 months in village Kanapur and Jatni.
| Time ‘0’ (%) | 18 Months (%) | 36 Months (%) | Total (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0/24 (0) | 1/24 (4.16) | ND | 1/24 (4.16) | |
| 0/33 (0) | ND | 1/33 (3.0) | 1/33 (3.0) | |
Fig 1Comparison of CFA between AS and CR cases.
CFA levels of 30 asymptomatic Mf carriers and 31 cryptic individuals were taken in to consideration for comparison. They are age sex matched and other parameters has been taken care as narrated in the Table 2.
Details and intensity of infection in two study group.
| Sl.No. | AS | CR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Sample No. | 30 | 31 |
| 2. | Male/Female | 21/9 | 23/8 |
| 3. | Median age in years (Range) | 26(9–66) | 28(7–75) |
| 4. | Mf Status | 30/30 | 0/31 |
| 5. | Mf density (GMI/ml) | 2194 | NA |
| 6. | CFA Status | 29/30 | 31/31 |
| 7. | CFA Density–GMI | 27056 | 949 |
| 8. | Clinical Symptoms | No | No |
Anti-sheath antibody between AS and CR cases.
| AS | CR | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 10 | |
| 57 | 52 |
P = 0.0191; χ2 = 5.492
Fig 2Profile of IgG and IgG subclasses against different filarial antigens.
Plasma levels of IgG and IgG subclasses were analyzed by ELISA. IgG against whole somatic antigen of adult Setaria worm (A) and Setaria MF (B) were analyzed. IgG isotypes against somatic antigen of adult setaria worm were analysed (C). Mean of 30 and 31 samples were shown.
Fig 3Profile of IgG and IgG subclasses against different filarial recombinant antigens.
Plasma levels of IgG and IgG subclasses against stage specific recombinant filarial antigens were analyzed by ELISA. Whole IgG against five recombinant antigens such as ALT-1, ALT-2, CPI 2 SPN 2 and Val-2 (A) and IgG isotypes against ALT-1 (B), ALT-2 (C) and CPI-2 (D) were depicted. Mean of 30 and 31 samples were shown.