| Literature DB >> 29927908 |
Chukwuma Mbaeyi, Zubair Mufti Wadood, Thomas Moran, Fazal Ather, Tasha Stehling-Ariza, Joanna Nikulin, Mohammad Al Safadi, Jane Iber, Laurel Zomahoun, Nidal Abourshaid, Hong Pang, Nikki Collins, Humayun Asghar, Obaid Ul Islam Butt, Cara C Burns, Derek Ehrhardt, Magdi Sharaf.
Abstract
Since the 1988 inception of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), progress toward interruption of wild poliovirus (WPV) transmission has occurred mostly through extensive use of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) in mass vaccination campaigns and through routine immunization services (1,2). However, because OPV contains live, attenuated virus, it carries the rare risk for reversion to neurovirulence. In areas with very low OPV coverage, prolonged transmission of vaccine-associated viruses can lead to the emergence of vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs), which can cause outbreaks of paralytic poliomyelitis. Although WPV type 2 has not been detected since 1999, and was declared eradicated in 2015,* most VDPV outbreaks have been attributable to VDPV serotype 2 (VDPV2) (3,4). After the synchronized global switch from trivalent OPV (tOPV) (containing vaccine virus types 1, 2, and 3) to bivalent OPV (bOPV) (types 1 and 3) in April 2016 (5), GPEI regards any VDPV2 emergence as a public health emergency (6,7). During May-June 2017, VDPV2 was isolated from stool specimens from two children with acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) in Deir-ez-Zor governorate, Syria. The first isolate differed from Sabin vaccine virus by 22 nucleotides in the VP1 coding region (903 nucleotides). Genetic sequence analysis linked the two cases, confirming an outbreak of circulating VDPV2 (cVDPV2). Poliovirus surveillance activities were intensified, and three rounds of vaccination campaigns, aimed at children aged <5 years, were conducted using monovalent OPV type 2 (mOPV2). During the outbreak, 74 cVDPV2 cases were identified; the most recent occurred in September 2017. Evidence indicates that enhanced surveillance measures coupled with vaccination activities using mOPV2 have interrupted cVDPV2 transmission in Syria.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29927908 PMCID: PMC6013082 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6724a5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ISSN: 0149-2195 Impact factor: 17.586
FIGURE 1Number of cases of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (cVDPV2), by governorate and month of paralysis onset (n = 74) — Syria, 2017
FIGURE 2Geographic distribution of cases* (n = 74) of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 — Syria, 2017
The figure above is a map showing the geographic distribution of cases (n = 74) of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 in Syria during 2017.
Sources: World Health Organization; Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, CDC.
* Each dot represents one case. Dots are randomly placed within the district boundary.
Vaccination activities in response to an outbreak of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 — Syria, 2017–2018
| Governorate/Vaccine type | Target age group (mos) | Outbreak response phase 1 | Outbreak response phase 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | Round 2 | Round 3 | |||||
| Administrative coverage* (%) | PCM† (recall) (%) | Administrative coverage* (%) | PCM† (recall) (%) | Administrative coverage* (%) | PCM† (recall) (%) | ||
|
| |||||||
| mOPV2 | <60 | 79 | 88 | 77 | 77 | 79 | 90 |
| IPV | 2–23 | — | — | 71 | 80 | — | — |
|
| |||||||
| mOPV2 | <60 | 86 | 57 | 114 | 84 | 86 | 84 |
| IPV | 2–23 | — | — | 50 | 50 | — | — |
|
| |||||||
| mOPV2 | <60 | — | — | — | — | 77 | 91 |
| IPV | 2–23 | — | — | — | — | 95 | 85 |
Abbreviations: IPV = inactivated poliovirus vaccine (contains types 1, 2, and 3); mOPV2 = monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2; PCM = postcampaign monitoring.
* Administrative coverage was calculated using denominators for the target age group provided by official sources. These denominators might not have reflected the actual target population because of frequent population movement to and from the outbreak-affected area.
Postcampaign monitoring is often considered a more accurate measure of vaccination coverage than administrative data and was estimated using cluster and market surveys administered by independent monitors to parents of children within the target age group.
§ Although no case was identified in Hasakeh governorate, it was included in response activities because of its geographic proximity to the outbreak-affected area.