Sharif A Ismail1, Sze Tung Lam2, Sadie Bell3, Fouad M Fouad4, Karl Blanchet5, Josephine Borghi3. 1. Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. sharif.ismail@lshtm.ac.uk. 2. National University of Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Singapore, Singapore. 3. Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 4. Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. 5. Geneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Childhood vaccination is among the most effective public health interventions available for the prevention of communicable disease, but coverage in many humanitarian settings is sub-optimal. This systematic review critically evaluated peer-review and grey literature evidence on the effectiveness of system-level interventions for improving vaccination coverage in protracted crises, focusing on how they work, and for whom, to better inform preparedness and response for future crises. METHODS: Realist-informed systematic review of peer-reviewed and grey literature. Keyword-structured searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Global Health, CINAHL, the Cochrane Collaboration and WHOLIS, and grey literature searches performed through the websites of UNICEF, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) and Technical Network for Strengthening Immunization Services. Results were independently double-screened for inclusion on title and abstract, and full text. Data were extracted using a pre-developed template, capturing information on the operating contexts in which interventions were implemented, intervention mechanisms, and vaccination-related outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the MMAT tool. Findings were narratively synthesised. RESULTS: 50 studies were included, most describing interventions applied in conflict or near-post conflict settings in sub-Saharan Africa, and complex humanitarian emergencies. Vaccination campaigns were the most commonly addressed adaptive mechanism (n = 17). Almost all campaigns operated using multi-modal approaches combining service delivery through multiple pathways (fixed and roving), health worker recruitment and training and community engagement to address both vaccination supply and demand. Creation of collaterals through service integration showed generally positive evidence of impact on routine vaccination uptake by bringing services closer to target populations and leveraging trust that had already been built with communities. Robust community engagement emerged as a key unifying mechanism for outcome improvement across almost all of the intervention classes, in building awareness and trust among crisis-affected populations. Some potentially transformative mechanisms for strengthening resilience in vaccination delivery were identified, but evidence for these remains limited. CONCLUSION: A number of interventions to support adaptations to routine immunisation delivery in the face of protracted crisis are identifiable, as are key unifying mechanisms (multi-level community engagement) apparently irrespective of context, but evidence remains piecemeal. Adapting these approaches for local system resilience-building remains a key challenge.
BACKGROUND: Childhood vaccination is among the most effective public health interventions available for the prevention of communicable disease, but coverage in many humanitarian settings is sub-optimal. This systematic review critically evaluated peer-review and grey literature evidence on the effectiveness of system-level interventions for improving vaccination coverage in protracted crises, focusing on how they work, and for whom, to better inform preparedness and response for future crises. METHODS: Realist-informed systematic review of peer-reviewed and grey literature. Keyword-structured searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Global Health, CINAHL, the Cochrane Collaboration and WHOLIS, and grey literature searches performed through the websites of UNICEF, the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) and Technical Network for Strengthening Immunization Services. Results were independently double-screened for inclusion on title and abstract, and full text. Data were extracted using a pre-developed template, capturing information on the operating contexts in which interventions were implemented, intervention mechanisms, and vaccination-related outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the MMAT tool. Findings were narratively synthesised. RESULTS: 50 studies were included, most describing interventions applied in conflict or near-post conflict settings in sub-Saharan Africa, and complex humanitarian emergencies. Vaccination campaigns were the most commonly addressed adaptive mechanism (n = 17). Almost all campaigns operated using multi-modal approaches combining service delivery through multiple pathways (fixed and roving), health worker recruitment and training and community engagement to address both vaccination supply and demand. Creation of collaterals through service integration showed generally positive evidence of impact on routine vaccination uptake by bringing services closer to target populations and leveraging trust that had already been built with communities. Robust community engagement emerged as a key unifying mechanism for outcome improvement across almost all of the intervention classes, in building awareness and trust among crisis-affected populations. Some potentially transformative mechanisms for strengthening resilience in vaccination delivery were identified, but evidence for these remains limited. CONCLUSION: A number of interventions to support adaptations to routine immunisation delivery in the face of protracted crisis are identifiable, as are key unifying mechanisms (multi-level community engagement) apparently irrespective of context, but evidence remains piecemeal. Adapting these approaches for local system resilience-building remains a key challenge.
Authors: Máire A Connolly; Michelle Gayer; Michael J Ryan; Peter Salama; Paul Spiegel; David L Heymann Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Nov 27-Dec 3 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Pierre Muhoza; M Carolina Danovaro-Holliday; Mamadou S Diallo; Padraic Murphy; Samir V Sodha; Jennifer H Requejo; Aaron S Wallace Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Sachiko Ozawa; Samantha Clark; Allison Portnoy; Simrun Grewal; Meghan L Stack; Anushua Sinha; Andrew Mirelman; Heather Franklin; Ingrid K Friberg; Yvonne Tam; Neff Walker; Andrew Clark; Matthew Ferrari; Chutima Suraratdecha; Steven Sweet; Sue J Goldie; Tini Garske; Michelle Li; Peter M Hansen; Hope L Johnson; Damian Walker Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Kate Causey; Nancy Fullman; Reed J D Sorensen; Natalie C Galles; Peng Zheng; Aleksandr Aravkin; M Carolina Danovaro-Holliday; Ramon Martinez-Piedra; Samir V Sodha; Martha Patricia Velandia-González; Marta Gacic-Dobo; Emma Castro; Jiawei He; Megan Schipp; Amanda Deen; Simon I Hay; Stephen S Lim; Jonathan F Mosser Journal: Lancet Date: 2021-07-17 Impact factor: 79.321