Literature DB >> 29927888

Comparison of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance vs. Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Body Composition Changes After Participation in a 10-Week Resistance Training Program.

Brad J Schoenfeld1, Brett S Nickerson2, Colin D Wilborn3, Stacie L Urbina3, Sara B Hayward3, James Krieger4, Alan A Aragon5, Grant M Tinsley6.   

Abstract

Schoenfeld, BJ, Nickerson, BS, Wilborn, CD, Urbina, SL, Hayward, SB, Krieger, J, Aragon, AA, and Tinsley, G. Comparison of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance vs. dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition changes after participation in a 10-week resistance training program. J Strength Cond Res 34(3): 678-688, 2020-The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MF-BIA) to determine alterations in total and segmental body composition across a 10-week resistance training (RT) program in comparison with the criterion reference dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Twenty-one young male volunteers (mean ± SD; age = 22.9 ± 3.0 years; height = 175.5 ± 5.9 cm; body mass = 82.9 ± 13.6 kg; body mass index = 26.9 ± 3.6) performed an RT program that included exercises for all major muscle groups. Body composition was assessed using both methods before and after the intervention; change scores were determined by subtracting pre-test values from post-test values for percent body fat ([INCREMENT]%BF), fat mass ([INCREMENT]FM), and fat-free mass ([INCREMENT]FFM). Mean changes were not significantly different when comparing MF-BIA with DXA for [INCREMENT]%BF (-1.05 vs. -1.28%), [INCREMENT]FM (-1.13 vs. -1.19 kg), and FFM (0.10 vs. 0.37 kg, respectively). Both methods showed strong agreement for [INCREMENT]%BF (r = 0.75; standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 1.15%), [INCREMENT]FM (r = 0.84; SEE 1.0 kg), and [INCREMENT]FFM (r = 0.71; SEE of 1.5 kg). The 2 methods were poor predictors of each other in regards to changes in segmental measurements. Our data indicate that MF-BIA is an acceptable alternative for tracking changes in FM and FFM during a combined diet and exercise program in young, athletic men, but segmental lean mass measurements must be interpreted with circumspection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 29927888     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Development and validation of bioelectrical impedance prediction equations estimating regional lean soft tissue mass in middle-aged adults.

Authors:  Luís B Sardinha; Gil B Rosa; Megan Hetherington-Rauth; Inês R Correia; João P Magalhães; Analiza M Silva; Henry Lukaski
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 4.884

2.  New Frontiers of Body Composition in Sport.

Authors:  Henry Lukaski; Christiana J Raymond-Pope
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Influence of Specific Collagen Peptides and Concurrent Training on Cardiometabolic Parameters and Performance Indices in Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Patrick Jendricke; Jan Kohl; Christoph Centner; Albert Gollhofer; Daniel König
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2020-11-19

4.  Progressive overload without progressing load? The effects of load or repetition progression on muscular adaptations.

Authors:  Daniel Plotkin; Max Coleman; Derrick Van Every; Jaime Maldonado; Douglas Oberlin; Michael Israetel; Jared Feather; Andrew Alto; Andrew D Vigotsky; Brad J Schoenfeld
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.061

5.  Strategic Ingestion of High-Protein Dairy Milk during a Resistance Training Program Increases Lean Mass, Strength, and Power in Trained Young Males.

Authors:  Maryam Pourabbas; Reza Bagheri; Babak Hooshmand Moghadam; Darryn S Willoughby; Darren G Candow; Bradley T Elliott; Scott C Forbes; Damoon Ashtary-Larky; Mozhgan Eskandari; Alexei Wong; Frédéric Dutheil
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Effects of 6 Months of Soy-Enriched High Protein Compared to Eucaloric Low Protein Snack Replacement on Appetite, Dietary Intake, and Body Composition in Normal-Weight Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Neda Haghighat; Damoon Ashtary-Larky; Reza Bagheri; Alexei Wong; Neda Cheraghloo; Gholamreza Moradpour; Michael Nordvall; Omid Asbaghi; Nader Moeinvaziri; Masoud Amini; Zahra Sohrabi; Frédéric Dutheil
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.