| Literature DB >> 33330579 |
Patrick Jendricke1, Jan Kohl1, Christoph Centner1, Albert Gollhofer1, Daniel König1,2.
Abstract
The purpose was to examine the effects of concurrent training (CT) combined with specific collagen peptides (SCP) intake on cardiometabolic parameters and performance indices in women. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial recreationally active women (n = 59) completed a 12-week CT training (3 day/week) and ingested 15 g of SCP (treatment group [TG]) or placebo (control group [CG]) on a daily basis. Running distance as a marker of endurance performance (time trial), velocity and heart rate at the lactate and anaerobic threshold (incremental running test) and body composition (bioelectrical impedance analysis [BIA]) were measured. BIA measurements included determination of fat mass (FM) and fat free mass (FFM). Additionally, muscular strength (one-repetition-maximum [1RM]) and muscular endurance (60% of 1RM) were assessed. After 12-weeks, TG had a higher increase in running distance (1,034 ± 643 m) compared to the CG (703 ± 356 m) indicated by a significant interaction effect (p < 0.05). Velocity at lactate and anaerobic threshold improved in both groups over time (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between groups. Similarly, heart rate at lactate threshold decreased over time (p < 0.001), with no time × group interaction. TG declined more in heart rate at anaerobic threshold (-8 ± 14 bpm) than the CG (-1 ± 7 bpm), which resulted in a significant interaction effect (p < 0.01). FM decreased over time in TG and CG (p < 0.001), with no group differences. On contrary, TG had a higher increase in FFM (0.8 ± 0.9 kg) compared to the CG (0.3 ± 1.0 kg) (time × group interaction: p < 0.05). Both, 1RM and muscular endurance improved over time (p < 0.001), with no significant group differences. In conclusion, supplementation of SCP in combination with CT resulted in a significant increase in endurance performance compared to the control group. This might potentially be a consequence of improved structural and cardiometabolic adaptations.Entities:
Keywords: body composition; collagen peptide; concurrent training; endurance performance; lactate threshold; protein supplementation; running distance
Year: 2020 PMID: 33330579 PMCID: PMC7710701 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2020.580918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Flow chart of subject recruitment, randomization, and follow-up.
Baseline characteristics of the subjects in TG (n = 28) and CG (n = 31).
| Age (years) | TG | 25.4 ± 4.2 | 18 | 35 |
| CG | 26.8 ± 5.7 | 20 | 39 | |
| Height (cm) | TG | 167 ± 6.8 | 153 | 180 |
| CG | 167 ± 6.3 | 156 | 181 | |
| Body weight (kg) | TG | 62.5 ± 8.6 | 46.4 | 78.5 |
| CG | 63.3 ± 6.0 | 52.5 | 74.4 | |
| BMI (kg·m−2) | TG | 22.2 ± 2.1 | 18.7 | 26.0 |
| CG | 22.6 ± 1.6 | 18.7 | 24.9 | |
| FM (kg) | TG | 17.9 ± 5.19 | 10.1 | 29.9 |
| CG | 17.7 ± 3.79 | 10.8 | 26.5 | |
| FFM (kg) | TG | 44.6 ± 4.69 | 36.2 | 56.9 |
| CG | 45.6 ± 4.33 | 37.1 | 54.5 |
Values are means ± SD for n subjects. TG, treatment group; CG, control group; BMI, body mass index; FM, fat mass; FFM, fat free mass.
Changes in energy intake, macronutrients, amino acids, fluid intake, and energy expenditure before (Pre) and after (Post) supplementation with TG (n = 28) or CG (n = 31).
| Total energy (kcal) | TG | 1,849 ± 565 | 1,757 ± 644 | 0.473 | 0.676 | 0.112 |
| CG | 1,795 ± 533 | 1,771 ± 484 | ||||
| Protein intake (g) | TG | 63.3 ± 23.7 | 59.8 ± 19.2 | 0.208 | 0.804 | 0.066 |
| CG | 65.5 ± 23.8 | 60.3 ± 18.4 | ||||
| Fat intake (g) | TG | 70.8 ± 33.7 | 69.4 ± 31.9 | 0.959 | 0.750 | 0.085 |
| CG | 67.6 ± 27.7 | 68.7 ± 23.5 | ||||
| Carbohydrate intake (g) | TG | 211 ± 73.4 | 199 ± 78.8 | 0.356 | 0.872 | 0.043 |
| CG | 209 ± 65.5 | 201 ± 67.6 | ||||
| Leucine (g) | TG | 4.97 ± 1.91 | 4.68 ± 1.49 | 0.220 | 0.815 | 0.062 |
| CG | 5.04 ± 2.03 | 4.62 ± 1.49 | ||||
| BCAA (g) | TG | 11.0 ± 4.86 | 10.7 ± 3.43 | 0.373 | 0.643 | 0.124 |
| CG | 11.7 ± 4.68 | 10.8 ± 3.17 | ||||
| Fluid intake (ml) | TG | 2,486 ± 1,180 | 2,307 ± 1,357 | 0.772 | 0.067 | 0.495 |
| CG | 2,441 ± 978 | 2,686 ± 1,026 | ||||
| Energy expenditure (kcal) | TG | 2,134 ± 1,421 | 1,921 ± 1,033 | 0.079 | 0.416 | 0.217 |
| CG | 2,762 ± 1,218 | 2,188 ± 1,270 |
Values are means ± SD for n subjects. TG, treatment group; CG, control group; BCAA, branched chain amino acids; d, Cohen's d.
Figure 2Changes in running distance after 12 weeks of intervention in treatment group (n = 28) and control group (n = 31). Values are means ± SD for n subjects. *Significantly different (p < 0.05) by repeated-measures ANOVA (time × group interaction).
Changes in time trial, lactate thresholds and muscle strength before (Pre) and after (Post) supplementation with TG (n = 28) or CG (n = 31).
| Time trial (m) | TG | 8,572 ± 1,224 | 9,606 ± 927 | <0.001 | 0.016 | 0.658 |
| CG | 8,929 ± 1,399 | 9,632 ± 1,354 | ||||
| VLT (km·h−1) | TG | 6.75 ± 0.76 | 7.46 ± 0.98 | <0.001 | 0.459 | 0.198 |
| CG | 6.91 ± 0.86 | 7.48 ± 0.99 | ||||
| VIAT (km·h−1) | TG | 9.39 ± 1.12 | 10.25 ± 1.18 | <0.001 | 0.562 | 0.155 |
| CG | 9.55 ± 1.30 | 10.32 ± 1.19 | ||||
| HRLT (bpm) | TG | 157 ± 14.2 | 149 ± 12.8 | 0.002 | 0.087 | 0.462 |
| CG | 150 ± 15.5 | 148 ±12.7 | ||||
| HRIAT (bpm) | TG | 179 ± 10.5 | 171 ± 13.9 | 0.002 | 0.007 | 0.745 |
| CG | 173 ± 11.1 | 172 ± 8.96 | ||||
| LT (mmol·l−1) | TG | 1.82 ± 0.59 | 1.79 ± 0.51 | 0.443 | 0.802 | 0.067 |
| CG | 1.78 ± 0.51 | 1.75 ± 0.66 | ||||
| IAT (mmol·l−1) | TG | 3.32 ± 0.59 | 3.25 ± 0.51 | 0.442 | 0.800 | 0.068 |
| CG | 3.29 ± 0.51 | 3.25 ± 0.66 | ||||
| 1RM (kg) | TG | 55.2 ± 11.2 | 60.2 ± 9.92 | <0.001 | 0.243 | 0.313 |
| CG | 54.7 ± 13.1 | 61.3 ± 12.9 | ||||
| 60% of 1RM (RP) | TG | 22.3 ± 7.85 | 30.4 ± 8.99 | <0.001 | 0.126 | 0.412 |
| CG | 23.6 ± 9.67 | 28.7 ± 10.1 |
Values are means ± SD for n subjects. TG, treatment group; CG, control group; VLT, velocity at lactate threshold; VIAT, velocity at individual anaerobic threshold; HRLT, heart rate at lactate threshold; HRIAT, heart rate at individual anaerobic threshold; LT, lactate threshold; IAT, individual anaerobic threshold; 1RM, one repetition maximum; 60% of 1RM (RP), repetitions of 60% of 1RM;
significant difference at baseline between TG and CG;
significant Bonferroni corrected Student's t-test; d, Cohen's d.
Figure 3Changes in HR at LT and HR at IAT after 12 weeks of intervention in treatment group (n = 28) and control group (n = 31). Values are means ± SD for n subjects. **Significantly different (p < 0.01) by repeated-measures ANOVA (time × group interaction).
Figure 4Changes in fat free mass and fat mass after 12 weeks of intervention in treatment group (n = 28) and control group (n = 31). Values are means ± SD for n subjects. *Significantly different (p < 0.05) by repeated-measures ANOVA (time × group interaction).
Changes in body composition before (Pre) and after (Post) supplementation with TG (n = 28) or CG (n = 31).
| Body weight (kg) | TG | 62.5 ± 8.60 | 62.3 ± 8.60 | 0.180 | 0.444 | 0.205 |
| CG | 63.3 ± 6.04 | 63.0 ± 6.63 | ||||
| FM (kg) | TG | 17.9 ± 5.19 | 16.9 ± 5.31 | <0.001 | 0.384 | 0.233 |
| CG | 17.7 ± 3.79 | 17.1 ± 4.13 | ||||
| FFM (kg) | TG | 44.6 ± 4.69 | 45.4 ± 4.60* | <0.001 | 0.045 | 0.543 |
| CG | 45.6 ± 4.33 | 45.9 ± 4.36 | ||||
| SMM (kg) | TG | 21.0 ± 2.80 | 21.6 ± 2.85 | <0.001 | 0.052 | 0.526 |
| CG | 21.8 ± 2.58 | 22.1 ± 2.62 | ||||
| TBW (L) | TG | 32.8 ± 3.54 | 33.4 ± 3.51* | 0.001 | 0.041 | 0.555 |
| CG | 33.7 ± 3.30 | 33.9 ± 3.51 | ||||
| ECW (L) | TG | 14.0 ± 1.54 | 14.3 ± 1.65 | 0.001 | 0.383 | 0.234 |
| CG | 14.3 ± 1.49 | 14.5 ± 1.48 | ||||
| ICW (L) | TG | 18.8 ± 2.03 | 19.1 ± 1.96* | 0.101 | 0.011 | 0.694 |
| CG | 19.4 ± 1.98 | 19.4 ± 2.01 |
Values are means ± SD for n subjects. TG, treatment group; CG, control group; FM, fat mass; FFM, fat free mass; SMM, skeletal muscle mass; TBW, total body water; ECW, extracellular water; ICW, intracellular water; *significant Bonferroni corrected Student's t-test; d, Cohen's d.