Literature DB >> 29927780

Reducing Simulated Channel Interaction Reveals Differences in Phoneme Identification Between Children and Adults With Normal Hearing.

Kelly N Jahn1, Mishaela DiNino, Julie G Arenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Channel interaction, the stimulation of overlapping populations of auditory neurons by distinct cochlear implant (CI) channels, likely limits the speech perception performance of CI users. This study examined the role of vocoder-simulated channel interaction in the ability of children with normal hearing (cNH) and adults with normal hearing (aNH) to recognize spectrally degraded speech. The primary aim was to determine the interaction between number of processing channels and degree of simulated channel interaction on phoneme identification performance as a function of age for cNH and to relate those findings to aNH and to CI users.
DESIGN: Medial vowel and consonant identification of cNH (age 8-17 years) and young aNH were assessed under six (for children) or nine (for adults) different conditions of spectral degradation. Stimuli were processed using a noise-band vocoder with 8, 12, and 15 channels and synthesis filter slopes of 15 (aNH only), 30, and 60 dB/octave (all NH subjects). Steeper filter slopes (larger numbers) simulated less electrical current spread and, therefore, less channel interaction. Spectrally degraded performance of the NH listeners was also compared with the unprocessed phoneme identification of school-aged children and adults with CIs.
RESULTS: Spectrally degraded phoneme identification improved as a function of age for cNH. For vowel recognition, cNH exhibited an interaction between the number of processing channels and vocoder filter slope, whereas aNH did not. Specifically, for cNH, increasing the number of processing channels only improved vowel identification in the steepest filter slope condition. Additionally, cNH were more sensitive to changes in filter slope. As the filter slopes increased, cNH continued to receive vowel identification benefit beyond where aNH performance plateaued or reached ceiling. For all NH participants, consonant identification improved with increasing filter slopes but was unaffected by the number of processing channels. Although cNH made more phoneme identification errors overall, their phoneme error patterns were similar to aNH. Furthermore, consonant identification of adults with CI was comparable to aNH listening to simulations with shallow filter slopes (15 dB/octave). Vowel identification of earlier-implanted pediatric ears was better than that of later-implanted ears and more comparable to cNH listening in conditions with steep filter slopes (60 dB/octave).
CONCLUSIONS: Recognition of spectrally degraded phonemes improved when simulated channel interaction was reduced, particularly for children. cNH showed an interaction between number of processing channels and filter slope for vowel identification. The differences observed between cNH and aNH suggest that identification of spectrally degraded phonemes continues to improve through adolescence and that children may benefit from reduced channel interaction beyond where adult performance has plateaued. Comparison to CI users suggests that early implantation may facilitate development of better phoneme discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29927780      PMCID: PMC6309331          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  9 in total

1.  Auditory Detection Thresholds and Cochlear Resistivity Differ Between Pediatric Cochlear Implant Listeners With Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct and Those With Connexin-26 Mutations.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Molly D Bergan; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Toddlers' fast-mapping from noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; Giovanna Morini; Emily Shroads; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Single-Channel Focused Thresholds Relate to Vowel Identification in Pediatric and Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Meisam K Arjmandi; Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

Review 4.  Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg; David L Horn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners: Effects of age and the electrode-neuron interface.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Lindsay DeVries; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Estimated Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Listeners Is Different for Early-Implanted Children and Late-Implanted Adults.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Gabrielle O'Brien; Steven M Bierer; Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-25

7.  Word Recognition and Frequency Selectivity in Cochlear Implant Simulation: Effect of Channel Interaction.

Authors:  Pierre-Antoine Cucis; Christian Berger-Vachon; Hung Thaï-Van; Ruben Hermann; Stéphane Gallego; Eric Truy
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Individual Variability in Recalibrating to Spectrally Shifted Speech: Implications for Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael L Smith; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

9.  Using Spectral Blurring to Assess Effects of Channel Interaction on Speech-in-Noise Perception with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Julie G Arenberg; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.