Literature DB >> 29926745

Long-Term Survival after Microfracture and Mosaicplasty for Knee Articular Cartilage Repair: A Comparative Study Between Two Treatments Cohorts.

Eirik Solheim1,2,3, Janne Hegna2, Eivind Inderhaug1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate survival of cartilage repair in the knee by microfracture (MFX; n = 119) or mosaicplasty osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT; n = 84).
DESIGN: For survival analyses, "failure" was defined as the event of a patient reporting a Lysholm score <65 or undergoing an ipsilateral knee replacement. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for construction of a survival functions plot for the event "failure." Log rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used for comparison of survival distributions in the 2 groups.
RESULTS: The long-term failure rate (62% overall) was significantly higher in the MFX group (66%) compared with the OAT group (51%, P = 0.01). Furthermore, the mean time to failure was significantly shorter (P < 0.001) in the MFX group, 4.0 years (SD 4.1) compared with the OAT group, 8.4 years (SD 4.8). In the OAT group, the survival rate stayed higher than 80% for the first 7 years, and higher than 60% for 15 years, while the survival rate dropped to less than 80% within 12 months, and to less than 60% within 3 years in the MFX group, log rank (Mantel-Cox) 20.295 (P < 0.001). The same pattern was found in a subgroup of patients (n = 134) of same age (<51 years) and size of treated lesion (<500 mm2), log rank (Mantel-Cox) 10.738 (P = 0.001). The nonfailures (48%) were followed for median 15 yeas (1-18 years).
CONCLUSIONS: MFX articular cartilage repairs failed more often and earlier than the OAT repairs, both in the whole cohort and in a subgroup of patients matched for age and size of treated lesion, indicating that the OAT repair is the more durable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  articular cartilage defects; knee; microfracture; mosaicplasty; survival analyses

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29926745      PMCID: PMC6921956          DOI: 10.1177/1947603518783482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cartilage        ISSN: 1947-6035            Impact factor:   4.634


  32 in total

1.  Evaluation of cartilage injuries and repair.

Authors:  Mats Brittberg; Carl S Winalski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee.

Authors:  P C Kreuz; M R Steinwachs; C Erggelet; S J Krause; G Konrad; M Uhl; N Südkamp
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 3.  An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies.

Authors:  Rune B Jakobsen; Lars Engebretsen; James R Slauterbeck
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Long-term clinical follow-up of microfracture versus mosaicplasty in articular cartilage defects of medial femoral condyle.

Authors:  Eirik Solheim; Janne Hegna; Eivind Inderhaug
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Randomized Study of Long-term (15-17 Years) Outcome After Microfracture Versus Mosaicplasty in Knee Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Eirik Solheim; Janne Hegna; Torbjørn Strand; Thomas Harlem; Eivind Inderhaug
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  An educational review of cartilage repair: precepts & practice--myths & misconceptions--progress & prospects.

Authors:  E B Hunziker; K Lippuner; M J B Keel; N Shintani
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Arthroscopic mosaicplasty: long-term outcome and joint degeneration progression.

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Francesco Perdisa; Cecilia Tetta; Alessandro Di Martino; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Microfracture treatment of single or multiple articular cartilage defects of the knee: a 5-year median follow-up of 110 patients.

Authors:  Eirik Solheim; Jannike Øyen; Janne Hegna; Ove K Austgulen; Thomas Harlem; Torbjørn Strand
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture.

Authors:  Daniel B F Saris; Johan Vanlauwe; Jan Victor; Karl Fredrik Almqvist; Rene Verdonk; Johan Bellemans; Frank P Luyten
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  14 in total

1.  The 50 most-cited clinical articles in cartilage surgery research: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Marco Franceschini; Angelo Boffa; Luca Andriolo; Alessandro Di Martino; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Evaluation of Electrospun PCL-PLGA for Sustained Delivery of Kartogenin.

Authors:  Steven Elder; John Graham Roberson; James Warren; Robert Lawson; Daniel Young; Sean Stokes; Matthew K Ross
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.927

3.  Methodology to Quantify Collagen Subtypes and Crosslinks: Application in Minipig Cartilages.

Authors:  Benjamin J Bielajew; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Microfracture Versus Drilling of Articular Cartilage Defects: A Systematic Review of the Basic Science Evidence.

Authors:  Matthew J Kraeutler; Gianna M Aliberti; Anthony J Scillia; Eric C McCarty; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-08-21

5.  Cell-Free Scaffolds in Cartilage Knee Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Davide Reale; Alessandro Di Martino; Angelo Boffa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation in the German health care system: a discrete event simulation.

Authors:  Tobias Vogelmann; Philip P Roessler; Matthias Buhs; Sven Ostermeier; Justus Gille; Arnd Hoburg; York Zöllner; Sebastian Schwarz; Tino Schubert; Marco Grebe; Wolfgang Zinser
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Biphasic Double-Network Hydrogel With Compartmentalized Loading of Bioactive Glass for Osteochondral Defect Repair.

Authors:  Bingchuan Liu; Yanran Zhao; Tengjiao Zhu; Shan Gao; Kaifeng Ye; Fang Zhou; Dong Qiu; Xing Wang; Yun Tian; Xiaozhong Qu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-07-02

8.  Eighty Percent Survival of Resurfacing Implants in the Knee After 10 Years: A Nationwide Cohort Study on 379 Procedures from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:  Bjørn B Christensen; Anders El-Galaly; Jens Ole Laursen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  Particulated Cartilage for Chondral and Osteochondral Repair: A Review.

Authors:  Bjørn Borsøe Christensen; Morten Lykke Olesen; Kris Tvilum Chadwick Hede; Natasja Leth Bergholt; Casper Bindzus Foldager; Martin Lind
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Clinical outcome after mosaicplasty of knee articular cartilage defects of patellofemoral joint versus tibiofemoral joint.

Authors:  Eirik Solheim; Janne Hegna; Eivind Inderhaug
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.