Literature DB >> 29253350

Randomized Study of Long-term (15-17 Years) Outcome After Microfracture Versus Mosaicplasty in Knee Articular Cartilage Defects.

Eirik Solheim1,2,3, Janne Hegna2, Torbjørn Strand1, Thomas Harlem1, Eivind Inderhaug1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few comparative randomized long-term studies on microfracture versus mosaicplasty have been published, and only 2 studies reported a follow-up of 10 years. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the clinical outcome of microfracture versus mosaicplasty/osteochondral autograft transfer in symptomatic cartilage lesions. The null hypothesis was that the outcome was not statistically different at any point of time. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS: Forty patients with articular cartilage defects were randomized to undergo cartilage repair by either microfracture (n = 20) or mosaicplasty (n = 20). Inclusion criteria were as follows: age 18 to 50 years at the time of surgery, 1 or 2 symptomatic focal full-thickness articular chondral defects on the femoral condyles or trochlea, and size 2 to 6 cm2. The main outcome variable was the Lysholm knee score recorded before the surgery and at 12 months, median 5 years, median 10 years, and minimum 15 years after the surgery.
RESULTS: Forty patients were included in the study (28 men, 12 women; median age, 32 years; range, 18-48 years). Defects with a median size of 3.5 cm2 (range, 2-5 cm2) were treated. A significant increase in the Lysholm score was seen for all subjects- from a mean 53 (SD, 16) at baseline to 69 (SD, 21) at the minimum 15-year follow-up ( P = .001). The mean Lysholm score was significantly higher in the mosaicplasty group than the microfracture group at 12 months, median 5 years, median 10 years, and minimum 15 years: 77 (SD, 17) versus 61 (SD, 22), respectively ( P = .01), at the last follow-up. At all follow-up time points, the difference in mean Lysholm score was clinically significant (>10 points).
CONCLUSION: At short, medium, and long term (minimum 15 years), mosaicplasty results in a better, clinically relevant outcome than microfracture in articular cartilage defects (2-5 cm2) of the distal femur of the knee in patients aged 18 to 50 years.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroscopy; articular cartilage defects; knee; microfracture; mosaicplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29253350     DOI: 10.1177/0363546517745281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  23 in total

Review 1.  Surgical and tissue engineering strategies for articular cartilage and meniscus repair.

Authors:  Heenam Kwon; Wendy E Brown; Cassandra A Lee; Dean Wang; Nikolaos Paschos; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Current hip cartilage regeneration/repair modalities: a scoping review of biologics and surgery.

Authors:  Mario Hevesi; George Jacob; Kazunori Shimomura; Wataru Ando; Norimasa Nakamura; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Long-Term Survival after Microfracture and Mosaicplasty for Knee Articular Cartilage Repair: A Comparative Study Between Two Treatments Cohorts.

Authors:  Eirik Solheim; Janne Hegna; Eivind Inderhaug
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Microfracture for cartilage repair in the knee: a systematic review of the contemporary literature.

Authors:  Patrick Orth; Liang Gao; Henning Madry
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Osteochondral Autograft Transplant (Mosaicplasty) for Knee Articular Cartilage Defects.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Eirik Solheim
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-10-23

6.  Two-Year Follow-Up and Remodeling Kinetics of ChonDux Hydrogel for Full-Thickness Cartilage Defect Repair in the Knee.

Authors:  Matthew T Wolf; Hong Zhang; Blanka Sharma; Norman A Marcus; Uwe Pietzner; Stefan Fickert; Achim Lueth; G H Robert Albers; Jennifer H Elisseeff
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Wide Variation in Methodology in Level I and II Studies on Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Review of Available Clinical Trials Comparing Patient Demographics, Treatment Means, and Outcomes Reporting.

Authors:  Bryan Michael Saltzman; Michael L Redondo; Adam Beer; Eric J Cotter; Rachel M Frank; Adam B Yanke; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Favourable long-term functional and radiographical outcome after osteoautograft transplantation surgery of the knee: a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Elina Ekman; Keijo Mäkelä; Ia Kohonen; Ari Hiltunen; Ari Itälä
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Cell-Free Scaffolds in Cartilage Knee Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Davide Reale; Alessandro Di Martino; Angelo Boffa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Cartilage Restoration of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Robert L Parisien; Michael Constant; Bryan M Saltzman; Charles A Popkin; Christopher S Ahmad; Xinning Li; David P Trofa
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.