Literature DB >> 29926212

Proposal for a new trajectory for subaxial cervical lateral mass screws.

Samer Amhaz-Escanlar1, Alberto Jorge-Mora1, Teresa Jorge-Mora2, Manuel Febrero-Bande3, Maximo-Alberto Diez-Ulloa4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lateral mass screws combined with rods are the standard method for posterior cervical spine subaxial fixation. Several techniques have been described, among which the most used are Roy Camille, Magerl, Anderson and An. All of them are based on tridimensional angles. Reliability of freehand angle estimation remains poorly investigated. We propose a new technique based on on-site spatial references and compare it with previously described ones assessing screw length and neurovascular potential complications.
METHODS: Four different lateral mass screw insertion techniques (Magerl, Anderson, An and the new described technique) were performed bilaterally, from C3 to C6, in ten human spine specimens. A drill tip guide wire was inserted as originally described for each trajectory, and screw length was measured. Exit point was examined, and potential vertebral artery or nerve root injury was assessed.
RESULTS: Mean screw length was 14.05 mm using Magerl's technique, 13.47 mm using Anderson's, 12.8 mm using An's and 17.03 mm using the new technique. Data analysis showed significantly longer lateral mass screw length using the new technique (p value < 0.00001). Nerve potential injury occurred 37 times using Magerl's technique, 28 using Anderson's, 13 using An's and twice using the new technique. Vertebral artery potential injury occurred once using Magerl's technique, 8 times using Anderson's and none using either An's or the new proposed technique. The risk of neurovascular complication was significantly lower using the new technique (p value < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The new proposed technique allows for longer screws, maximizing purchase and stability, while lowering the complication rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artery; Complication; Lateral mass screw; Length; Root

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29926212     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5670-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  The anatomic relation of lateral mass screws to the spinal nerves. A comparison of the Magerl, Anderson, and An techniques.

Authors:  R Xu; S P Haman; N A Ebraheim; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Treatment of lower cervical spinal injuries--C3 to C7.

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; G Saillant; C Laville; J P Benazet
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates.

Authors:  B Jeanneret; F Magerl; E H Ward; J C Ward
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Comparative analysis of three different cervical lateral mass screw fixation techniques by complications and bicortical purchase : cadaveric study.

Authors:  Jin-Wook Baek; Dong-Mook Park; Dae-Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-09-30

5.  Anatomic considerations for plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine.

Authors:  H S An; R Gordin; K Renner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Stabilization of subaxial cervical spines by lateral mass screw fixation with modified Magerl's technique.

Authors:  Jau-Ching Wu; Wen-Cheng Huang; Yu-Chun Chen; Yang-Hsin Shih; Henrich Cheng
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2008-12

7.  Quantitative anatomy of subaxial cervical lateral mass: an analysis of safe screw lengths for Roy-Camille and magerl techniques.

Authors:  Brian D Stemper; Satyajit V Marawar; Narayan Yoganandan; Barry S Shender; Raj D Rao
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Safe lateral-mass screw lengths in the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques. An anatomic study.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; T Klausner; R Xu; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Lateral mass screw complications: analysis of 1662 screws.

Authors:  Pavlos Katonis; Stamatios A Papadakis; Spyros Galanakos; Ditran Paskou; Artan Bano; George Sapkas; Alexander G Hadjipavlou
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-10

10.  Radiographic and clinical assessment of a freehand lateral mass screw fixation technique: is it always safe in subaxial cervical spine?

Authors:  In-Hoo Ra; Woo-Kie Min
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  4 in total

1.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor of G.C. Willhuber concerning "Proposal for a new trajectory for subaxial cervical lateral mass screws" by S. Amhaz-Escanlar et al. (Eur Spine J; 2018: doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5670-5).

Authors:  Máximo-Alberto Díez-Ulloa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Letter to the Editor concerning "Proposal for a new trajectory for subaxial cervical lateral mass screws" by S. Amhaz-Escanlar et al. (Eur Spine J; 2018: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5670-5).

Authors:  Gaston Camino Willhuber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comments on "Posterior Subaxial Cervical Spine Screw Fixation: A Review of Techniques" by Joaquim et al.

Authors:  Máximo-Alberto Díez-Ulloa
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-03-12

4.  Lateral mass intra-pedicular screw fixation for subaxial cervical spines - An alternative surgical technique.

Authors:  Kota Kojima; Masayuki Ishikawa; Takahiro Endo; Jun Muto; Yasuyuki Fukui; Shunji Asamoto
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-06-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.