| Literature DB >> 29925786 |
Esam M Bakir1,2, Nancy S Younis3,4, Maged E Mohamed5,6, Nermin A El Semary7,8.
Abstract
To the best of our knowledge, cyanobacterial strains from the Arabian Gulf have neverEntities:
Keywords: cardiac biomarkers; cardiac injury; cyanobacteria; gold nanoparticles; myocardial infarction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29925786 PMCID: PMC6025002 DOI: 10.3390/md16060217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Optical images of (A) green cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscula and (B) the same cyanobacterium in the mode of gold nanoparticle production.
Figure 2(A) The UV-visible absorption (B) and the fluorescence spectra of control cyanobacteria (Lyngbya majuscula cyanobacteria culture with no Au3+ addition, green line) and produced gold nanoparticles (Lyngbya majuscula cyanobacteria culture supplied with Au3+, purple color). The absorption band seen at 535 nm indicates the production of gold nanoparticles.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscope image of gold nanoparticles produced by cyanobacteria Lyngbya majuscula with average size diameter 41.7 ± 0.2 nm.
Figure 4The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) spectrum of gold nanoparticles produced by the cyanobacteria L. majuscula.
Figure 5FTIR analysis of gold nanoparticle suspension complex with L. majuscula.
Figure 6Acyclic voltammetry scan was recorded at the rate of 100 mV/s for cyanobacteria and gold nanoparticle complexes with cyanobacteria.
Figure 7The treatment effects of bacterial extract (BE, 200 mg/kg/day, IP) and gold nanoparticles (GNPs, 200 mg/kg/day, IP) and combination (BE + GNPs) respectively, for 14 successive days on isoproterenol (ISO)-induced myocardial infarction with respect toserum level of cardiac marker enzymes. (A) CPK, (B) CP-MB, and (C) cTnT in normal and isoproterenol-induced MI rats. All values were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).ISO: isoproterenol, BE: bacteria extract, GNPs: gold nanoparticles, CPK: creatine phosphokinase, CK-MB: creatine kinase-myocardial bound, andcTnT: cardiac troponin T. # indicatesa statistically significant difference from the normal group, * indicatesa statistically significant difference from the isoproterenol control group, @ indicatesa statistically significant difference from the gold nanoparticles-treated (p < 0.05) group using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test as a post hoc analysis.
Figure 8(I) Tracings obtained during blood pressure (BP) recordings. (A): Normal, (B): ISO control, (C): ISO + BE, (D): ISO + GNPs, (E): ISO + BE + GNPs. (II) The treatment effects of bacterial extract (BE, 200 mg/kg/day, IP) and GNPs (200 mg/kg/day, IP) and their combination (BE + GNPs), respectively, for 14 successive days on isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction (MI) with respect to SAP(A), DAP (B), MAP (C), and heart rate(D)in normal and ISO-induced MI rats. All values were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8).ISO: isoproterenol, SAP: systolic arterial pressure, DAP: diastolic arterial pressure, MAP: mean arterial pressure, and HR: heart rate. # indicates a statistically significant difference from the normal group, * indicates a statistically significant difference from the isoproterenol control group, @ indicatesa statistically significant difference from the gold nanoparticle-treated (p < 0.05) group using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test as a post hoc analysis.
The treatment effects of bacterial extract (200 mg/kg/day, IP), GNPs (200 mg/kg/day, IP), and a combination (BE and GNPs) respectively, for 14 successive days on isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarction with respect to SAP (A), DAP (B), MAP (C), and HR (D) in normal and ISO-induced MI rats. All values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8).ISO: isoproterenol, SAP: systolic arterial pressure, DAP: diastolic arterial pressure, MAP: mean arterial pressure, and HR: heart rate. # indicates a statistically significant difference from the normal group, * indicates a statistically significant difference from the isoproterenol control group.
| Normal | ISO Control | ISO + BE | ISO + GNPs | ISO + BE+ GMPs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST elevation (mV) | 0.027 ± 0.002 | 0.184 ± 0.013 # | 0.145 ± 0.029 | 0.064 ± 0.007 * | 0.060 ± 0.009 * |
| QRS complex (s) | 0.042 ± 0.001 | 0.027 ± 0.002 # | 0.027 ± 0.002 | 0.038 ± 0.001 * | 0.042 ± 0.000 * |
| QT interval (s) | 0.045 ± 0.004 | 0.088 ± 0.008 # | 0.069 ± 0.005 | 0.061 ± 0.003 * | 0.061 ± 0.004 * |
| P-R interval (s) | 0.232 ± 0.023 | 0.160 ± 0.003 # | 0.197 ± 0.028 | 0.212 ± 0.019 * | 0.222 ± 0.016 * |
| R-R interval (s) | 0.230 ± 0.031 | 0.151 ± 0.004 # | 0.180 ± 0.003 | 0.199 ± 0.010 * | 0.208 ± 0.014 * |
Figure 9Electrocardiogram (ECG) tracings that were recorded for evaluating heart rate and rhythm disorders. Bacterial extract (BE, 200 mg/kg/day, IP), gold nanoparticles (GNPs, 200 mg/kg/day, IP), combination (BE+GNPs), isoproterenol (ISO).
Figure 10The treatment effects of bacterial extract (BE, 200 mg/kg/day, IP) and GNPs (GNPs, 200 mg/kg/day, IP) and their combination for 14 successive days in isoproterenol (ISO)-induced myocardial infarction (MI) on GRx (A) and SOD (B) in normal and ISO-induced MI rats. All values were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8).ISO: isoproterenol, GRx: glutathione reductase, and SOD: superoxide dismutase. # indicates a statistically significant difference from the normal group, * indicates a statistically significant difference from the isoproterenol control group, @ indicates a statistically significant difference from the gold nanoparticle-treated group (p < 0.05) using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test as a post hoc analysis.