Literature DB >> 29925643

Xpert Ultra Can Unambiguously Identify Specific Rifampin Resistance-Conferring Mutations.

Emmanuel André1, Bouke C de Jong2, Kamela C S Ng3, Armand van Deun2,4, Conor J Meehan2, Gabriela Torrea2, Michèle Driesen2, Siemon Gabriëls2, Leen Rigouts2,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultra probes; Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra; disputed mutations; melt peak temperature (Tm); melting temperature shift (ΔTm); rifampin-resistant tuberculosis; rpoB mutations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29925643      PMCID: PMC6113491          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00686-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


× No keyword cloud information.

LETTER

The deluge of data produced by the Xpert MTB/RIF test (Cepheid) can help improve global rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) control strategies through molecular epidemiological surveillance (1, 2). Recently, a new version of the test, Xpert Ultra (hereinafter called Ultra), was released (3). Determining the relationship between RR-conferring rpoB mutations, Ultra probes, and melting temperature shifts (ΔT), i.e., the difference between mutant and wild-type melting temperatures, allows Ultra results to be utilized for rapid detection of RR-TB strains and related underlying rpoB mutations. To determine the reliability of Ultra results for predicting specific mutations, we tested 13 rifampin-susceptible (RS)-TB strains and 104 RR-TB strains harboring 33 unique RR-conferring mutations from the Belgian Coordinated Collections of Microorganisms in the Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp according to a protocol previously described (2) (see the supplemental material). Of note, the Glu250Gly (n = 2) and Arg299Cys (n = 1) mutations were among the RS-TB strains. We then compared Ultra raw results with available rpoB sequences of the strains. Overall, 29/30 (97%) mutations inside the rifampin resistance-determining region (RRDR) were correctly identified by Ultra. Of concern, mutation His445Arg gave a “RIF Resistance Indeterminate” result among 3/4 strains tested, while it was reported as RR in the initial validation study (3). The silent mutation Thr444Thr was not reported as RR (Fig. 1). The RR-conferring mutations on codons 170 and 491 situated outside the RRDR were not detected.
FIG 1

Overview of Xpert Ultra test results. The observed probe reactions for each RRDR mutation were laid over the claimed probe coverage (light gray). Shown in black are probe reactions concordant with manufacturer claims, in blue are probe reactions missed by one probe but captured by another probe, and in red is a probe reaction representing a “RIF Resistance Indeterminate” result from 3 out of 4 strains tested. Results in the hatched pattern were superimposed for greater visibility.

Overview of Xpert Ultra test results. The observed probe reactions for each RRDR mutation were laid over the claimed probe coverage (light gray). Shown in black are probe reactions concordant with manufacturer claims, in blue are probe reactions missed by one probe but captured by another probe, and in red is a probe reaction representing a “RIF Resistance Indeterminate” result from 3 out of 4 strains tested. Results in the hatched pattern were superimposed for greater visibility. The probe reactions observed were largely in agreement with previous results (3), although we noted that mutations Met434Val, Met434Thr, and those in codon 435 were captured only by probe rpoB2, Ser450Leu and Ser450Trp were captured by both probe rpoB3 and probe rpoB4a, His445Arg was captured only by probe rpoB3, and Lys446Gln was captured only by probe rpoB4. All mutations except those in codon 450 were associated with a negative ΔT (Fig. 2). The combination of ΔT values with the capturing probes enabled us to differentiate mutations in codons 430, 431, 434, 435, 441, 446, 450, and 452, including disputed mutations (4) (Table 1). Mutation Asp435Tyr was unambiguously distinguished from Asp435Val with the ∣ΔT∣ of probe rpoB2, while mutations Ser441Gln and Ser441Leu were discriminated from the rest by the ∣ΔT∣ values of probes rpoB2 and rpoB3. Mutations His445Asp and His445Tyr were distinguished from disputed mutations His445Leu and His445Asn through the ∣ΔT∣ of probe rpoB3. Ser450Leu was distinguished from Ser450Trp by the ∣ΔT∣ of probe rpoB4A. The indeterminate result associated with His445Arg may be caused by its ∣ΔT∣ being equal to 1.8°C, unlike the ∣ΔT∣ values for other mutations, which typically exceed 2°C. Our recent experience with Ultra on diagnostic sputum samples pertained only to the Ser450Leu and His445Asp mutations, for which the ΔT corresponded exactly with the ΔT that we observed for bacterial thermolysates. This should be validated more extensively, which is beyond the scope of our present study.
FIG 2

Melting temperature shifts (ΔTs) observed upon detection of a rifampin resistance (RR)-conferring rpoB mutation in the RR-determining region (RRDR) by Xpert Ultra. The y axis reflects the melting temperature difference (ΔT) between mutant and wild-type probe-amplicon hybrids, while the x axis shows the mutations that we tested. The data points on the graph are ΔT values grouped by their associated Ultra probes (differentiated by color), which correspond to a specific rpoB mutation. x axis labels in brown are disputed mutations.

TABLE 1

Xpert Ultra raw results

Mutation(s)bNo. of strains testedNucleotide change(s)Xpert Ultra probe(s)Wild-typeTm range(s) (mean[s])Mutant Tm range(s)∣ΔTm∣ mean(s) or range(s)
Val170Phe3GTC→TTCNDNDNDND
Glu250Gly#2GAG→GGGNDNDNDND
Arg299Cys#1CGC→TGCNDNDNDND
*Leu430Pro8CTG→CCGrpoB169.1–69.5 (69.3)63.0–63.45.9–6.3
Leu430Pro + *Met434Ile1CTG→CCG; ATG→ATArpoB1; rpoB269.1–69.5 (69.3); 72.8–73.2 (73)63.2; 69.86.1; 3.2
Leu430Pro + Met434Val1CTG→CCG; ATG→GTGrpoB169.1–69.5 (69.3)63.06.3
Leu430Pro + His445Gln1CTG→CCG; CAC→CAGrpoB1; rpoB369.1–69.5 (69.3); 75.5–76.0 (75.75)63.5; 72.25.8; 3.6
Leu430Pro + His445Gln1CTG→CCG; CAC→CAArpoB1; rpoB369.1–69.5 (69.3); 75.5–76.0 (75.75)63.1; 71.76.2; 4.1
Asp435Gly + Met434Thr1GAC→GGC; ATG→ACGrpoB272.8–73.2 (73)69.73.3
*Asp435Phe1GAC→TTCrpoB272.8–73.2 (73)67.75.3
*Asp435Tyr11GAC→TACrpoB272.8–73.2 (73)68.6–69.04.0–4.4
Asp435Tyr + Asn437Asp1GAC→TAC; AAC→GACrpoB272.8–73.2 (73)66.66.4
Asp435Tyr + Met434Ile1GAC→TAC; ATG→ATTrpoB272.8–73.2 (73)68.54.5
*Asp435Val5GAC→GTCrpoB272.8–73.2 (73)69.3–69.53.5–3.7
Asp435Val + Gln432Glu1GAC→GTC; CAA→GAArpoB2; rpoB172.8–73.2 (73); 69.1–69.5 (69.3)70.5; 65.92.5; 3.4
*Ser441Gln1TCG→CAGrpoB2; rpoB372.8–73.2 (73); 75.5–76.0 (75.75)68.3; 73.54.7; 2.3
*Ser441Leu1TCG→TTGrpoB2; rpoB372.8–73.2 (73); 75.5–76.0 (75.75)70.0; 73.53.0; 2.3
His445Gly1CAC→GGCrpoB375.5–76.0 (75.75)70.94.9
His445Thr1CAC→ACCrpoB375.5–76.0 (75.75)70.94.9
His445Ser1CAC→AGCrpoB375.5–76.0 (75.75)71.14.7
His445Ser + *Lys446Gln + Thr444Thr1CAC→TCC; AAG→CAG; ACC→ACGrpoB4B67.0–67.6 (67.3)62.35.0
His445Asp3CAC→GACrpoB375.5–76.0 (75.75)71.9–72.13.7–3.9
His445Leu2CAC→CTCrpoB375.5–76.0 (75.75)72.2–72.33.5–3.6
His445Asn2CAC→AACrpoB375.5–76.0 (75.75)72.3–72.43.4–3.5
His445Asn + *Asp435Glu1CAC→AAC; GAC→GAArpoB3; rpoB275.5–76.0 (75.75); 72.8–73.2 (73)72.4; 70.23.4; 2.8
His445Tyr4CAC→TACrpoB375.5–76.0 (75.75)72.5–72.63.2–3.3
*His445Arg4CAC→CGCrpoB375.5–76.0 (75.75)73.91.9
His445Arg + Ser428Arg1CAC→CGC; AGC→AGGrpoB169.1–69.5 (69.3)65.83.5
Ser450Phe1TCG→TTCrpoB375.5–76.0 (75.75)71.84.0
*Ser450Leu14TCG→TTGrpoB3; rpoB4A75.5–76.0 (75.75); 67.0–67.6 (67.3)72.9–73.3; 73.3–73.82.5–2.9; 6.0–6.5
Ser450Leu + Thr482Asn2TCG→TTG; ACC→AACrpoB2; rpoB3; rpoB4A72.8–73.2 (73); 75.5–76.0 (75.75); 67.0–67.6 (67.3)69.2–69.5; 73.1–73.3; 73.6–73.73.5–3.8; 2.5–2.7; 6.3–6.4
Ser450Leu + Ile491Val2TCG→TTG; ATC→GTCrpoB2; rpoB3; rpoB4A72.8–73.2 (73); 75.5–76.0 (75.75); 67.0–67.6 (67.3)70.0; 73.2–73.3; 73.6–73.73.0; 2.5–2.6; 6.3–6.4
*Ser450Trp3TCG→TGGrpoB3; rpoB4A75.5–76.0 (75.75); 67.0–67.6 (67.3)73.1–73.5; 70.6–71.02.3–2.7; 3.3–3.7
Ser450Trp + *Ser431Gly1TCG→TGG; AGC→GGCrpoB3; rpoB4A; rpoB175.5–76.0 (75.75); 67.0–67.6 (67.3); 69.1–69.5 (69.3)73.2; 70.7; 66.42.6; 3.4; 2.9
*Leu452Pro12CTG→CCGrpoB4B67.0–67.6 (67.3)61.2–61.65.7–6.1
Ile491Phe10ATC→TTCNDNDNDND

Capturing probes, wild-type melt peak temperature (T) ranges and means, mutant T ranges, and absolute values of melting temperature shift (ΔT) ranges associated with specific rpoB mutations in the strains tested and the corresponding nucleotide changes. ND, strains that harbored corresponding mutations outside the RRDR yielded a “RIF Resistance Not Detected” result. *, rifampin resistance-determining region (RRDR) mutation unambiguously identified by unique combinations of Ultra probes and ΔTs, including disputed ones (in italics). #, rifampin susceptible according to phenotypic testing.

For double mutants, the high-confidence RR-conferring mutations are underlined (6, 7).

Melting temperature shifts (ΔTs) observed upon detection of a rifampin resistance (RR)-conferring rpoB mutation in the RR-determining region (RRDR) by Xpert Ultra. The y axis reflects the melting temperature difference (ΔT) between mutant and wild-type probe-amplicon hybrids, while the x axis shows the mutations that we tested. The data points on the graph are ΔT values grouped by their associated Ultra probes (differentiated by color), which correspond to a specific rpoB mutation. x axis labels in brown are disputed mutations. Xpert Ultra raw results Capturing probes, wild-type melt peak temperature (T) ranges and means, mutant T ranges, and absolute values of melting temperature shift (ΔT) ranges associated with specific rpoB mutations in the strains tested and the corresponding nucleotide changes. ND, strains that harbored corresponding mutations outside the RRDR yielded a “RIF Resistance Not Detected” result. *, rifampin resistance-determining region (RRDR) mutation unambiguously identified by unique combinations of Ultra probes and ΔTs, including disputed ones (in italics). #, rifampin susceptible according to phenotypic testing. For double mutants, the high-confidence RR-conferring mutations are underlined (6, 7). Our findings confirm the ability of Ultra to unambiguously identify a wide range of RRDR mutations. With the unprecedented rollout of Xpert MTB/RIF and associated connectivity solutions, such as DataToCare (Savics, Belgium) and GXAlert (SystemOne, USA) (2), Ultra results may allow us to rule out transmission between RR-TB patients in a specific setting (Fig. S1), distinguish relapse from reinfection (5) (Fig. S2), and resolve discordance between an RR Ultra result and a low-level RS phenotypic result due to a disputed mutation. For such applications, it is key that ΔT values are included in the exported results.
  7 in total

1.  Rifampin drug resistance tests for tuberculosis: challenging the gold standard.

Authors:  Armand Van Deun; Kya J M Aung; Valentin Bola; Rossin Lebeke; Mohamed Anwar Hossain; Willem Bram de Rijk; Leen Rigouts; Aysel Gumusboga; Gabriela Torrea; Bouke C de Jong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Connectivity of diagnostic technologies: improving surveillance and accelerating tuberculosis elimination.

Authors:  E Andre; C Isaacs; D Affolabi; R Alagna; D Brockmann; B C de Jong; E Cambau; G Churchyard; T Cohen; M Delmee; J-C Delvenne; M Farhat; A Habib; P Holme; S Keshavjee; A Khan; P Lightfoot; D Moore; Y Moreno; Y Mundade; M Pai; S Patel; A U Nyaruhirira; L E C Rocha; J Takle; A Trébucq; J Creswell; C Boehme
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Recurrent tuberculosis in the pre-elimination era.

Authors:  A Rosser; F M Marx; M Pareek
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Genome-wide analysis of multi- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Francesc Coll; Jody Phelan; Grant A Hill-Cawthorne; Mridul B Nair; Kim Mallard; Shahjahan Ali; Abdallah M Abdallah; Saad Alghamdi; Mona Alsomali; Abdallah O Ahmed; Stephanie Portelli; Yaa Oppong; Adriana Alves; Theolis Barbosa Bessa; Susana Campino; Maxine Caws; Anirvan Chatterjee; Amelia C Crampin; Keertan Dheda; Nicholas Furnham; Judith R Glynn; Louis Grandjean; Dang Minh Ha; Rumina Hasan; Zahra Hasan; Martin L Hibberd; Moses Joloba; Edward C Jones-López; Tomoshige Matsumoto; Anabela Miranda; David J Moore; Nora Mocillo; Stefan Panaiotov; Julian Parkhill; Carlos Penha; João Perdigão; Isabel Portugal; Zineb Rchiad; Jaime Robledo; Patricia Sheen; Nashwa Talaat Shesha; Frik A Sirgel; Christophe Sola; Erivelton Oliveira Sousa; Elizabeth M Streicher; Paul Van Helden; Miguel Viveiros; Robert M Warren; Ruth McNerney; Arnab Pain; Taane G Clark
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Tuberculosis drug resistance mutation database.

Authors:  Andreas Sandgren; Michael Strong; Preetika Muthukrishnan; Brian K Weiner; George M Church; Megan B Murray
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  The New Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: Improving Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Resistance to Rifampin in an Assay Suitable for Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Soumitesh Chakravorty; Ann Marie Simmons; Mazhgan Rowneki; Heta Parmar; Yuan Cao; Jamie Ryan; Padmapriya P Banada; Srinidhi Deshpande; Shubhada Shenai; Alexander Gall; Jennifer Glass; Barry Krieswirth; Samuel G Schumacher; Pamela Nabeta; Nestani Tukvadze; Camilla Rodrigues; Alena Skrahina; Elisa Tagliani; Daniela M Cirillo; Amy Davidow; Claudia M Denkinger; David Persing; Robert Kwiatkowski; Martin Jones; David Alland
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 7.867

7.  Potential Application of Digitally Linked Tuberculosis Diagnostics for Real-Time Surveillance of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Transmission: Validation and Analysis of Test Results.

Authors:  Kamela Charmaine Ng; Conor Joseph Meehan; Gabriela Torrea; Léonie Goeminne; Maren Diels; Leen Rigouts; Bouke Catherine de Jong; Emmanuel André
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-02-27
  7 in total
  10 in total

1.  Automatic Identification of Individual rpoB Gene Mutations Responsible for Rifampin Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Use of Melting Temperature Signatures Generated by the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Assay.

Authors:  Yuan Cao; Heta Parmar; Ann Marie Simmons; Devika Kale; Kristy Tong; Deanna Lieu; David Persing; Robert Kwiatkowski; David Alland; Soumitesh Chakravorty
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Identification and Characterization of Mycobacterial Species Using Whole-Genome Sequences.

Authors:  Marco A Riojas; Andrew M Frank; Samuel R Greenfield; Stephen P King; Conor J Meehan; Michael Strong; Alice R Wattam; Manzour Hernando Hazbón
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Genotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rifampin Resistance-Associated Mutations by Use of Data from Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Enables Large-Scale Tuberculosis Molecular Epidemiology Studies.

Authors:  Brian Weinrick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults.

Authors:  David J Horne; Mikashmi Kohli; Jerry S Zifodya; Ian Schiller; Nandini Dendukuri; Deanna Tollefson; Samuel G Schumacher; Eleanor A Ochodo; Madhukar Pai; Karen R Steingart
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-07

5.  False Rifampicin Resistance in Xpert Ultra Applied to Lymph Node Aspirate: A Case Report.

Authors:  Kamela C S Ng; Leen Rigouts; Bouke C de Jong; Lutgarde Lynen
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.835

6.  Added Value of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in a Low-Prevalence Setting.

Authors:  Onya Opota; Fathiah Zakham; Jesica Mazza-Stalder; Laurent Nicod; Gilbert Greub; Katia Jaton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  How Well Do Routine Molecular Diagnostics Detect Rifampin Heteroresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis?

Authors:  Kamela C S Ng; Philip Supply; Frank G J Cobelens; Cyril Gaudin; Julian Gonzalez-Martin; Bouke C de Jong; Leen Rigouts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology, culture and GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Authors:  Peixin Chen; Wenwen Sun; Yayi He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Discordance of the Repeat GeneXpert MTB/RIF Test for Rifampicin Resistance Detection Among Patients Initiating MDR-TB Treatment in Uganda.

Authors:  Willy Ssengooba; Jean de Dieu Iragena; Kevin Komakech; Iginitius Okello; Joanitah Nalunjogi; Winceslaus Katagira; Ivan Kimuli; Susan Adakun; Moses L Joloba; Gabriela Torrea; Bruce J Kirenga
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.835

10.  Bridging the TB data gap: in silico extraction of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis diagnostic test results from whole genome sequence data.

Authors:  Kamela C S Ng; Jean Claude S Ngabonziza; Pauline Lempens; Bouke C de Jong; Frank van Leth; Conor J Meehan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.