Literature DB >> 29925196

Chesapeake Bay's water quality condition has been recovering: Insights from a multimetric indicator assessment of thirty years of tidal monitoring data.

Qian Zhang1, Rebecca R Murphy2, Richard Tian2, Melinda K Forsyth3, Emily M Trentacoste4, Jennifer Keisman5, Peter J Tango6.   

Abstract

To protect the aquatic living resources of Chesapeake Bay, the Chesapeake Bay Program partnership has developed guidance for state water quality standards, which include ambient water quality criteria to protect designated uses (DUs), and associated assessment procedures for dissolved oxygen (DO), water clarity/underwater bay grasses, and chlorophyll-a. For measuring progress toward meeting the respective states' water quality standards, a multimetric attainment indicator approach was developed to estimate combined standards attainment. We applied this approach to three decades of monitoring data of DO, water clarity/underwater bay grasses, and chlorophyll-a data on annually updated moving 3-year periods to track the progress in all 92 management segments of tidal waters in Chesapeake Bay. In 2014-2016, 40% of tidal water segment-DU-criterion combinations in the Bay (n = 291) are estimated to meet thresholds for attainment of their water quality criteria. This index score marks the best 3-year status in the entire record. Since 1985-1987, the indicator has followed a nonlinear trajectory, consistent with impacts from extreme weather events and subsequent recoveries. Over the period of record (1985-2016), the indicator exhibited a positive and statistically significant trend (p < 0.05), indicating that the Bay has been recovering since 1985. Patterns of attainment of individual DUs are variable, but improvements in open water DO, deep channel DO, and water clarity/submerged aquatic vegetation have combined to drive the improvement in the Baywide indicator in 2014-2016 relative to its long-term median. Finally, the improvement in estimated Baywide attainment was statistically linked to the decline of total nitrogen, indicating responsiveness of attainment status to the reduction of nutrient load through various management actions since at least the 1980s.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chesapeake Bay; Chlorophyll-a; Dissolved oxygen; Monitoring and assessment; Trends; Water quality standards

Year:  2018        PMID: 29925196      PMCID: PMC6688177          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Long-term reductions in anthropogenic nutrients link to improvements in Chesapeake Bay habitat.

Authors:  Henry A Ruhl; Nancy B Rybicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Watershed export of fine sediment, organic carbon, and chlorophyll-a to Chesapeake Bay: Spatial and temporal patterns in 1984-2016.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Joel D Blomquist
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide.

Authors:  Angel Borja; Suzanne B Bricker; Daniel M Dauer; Nicolette T Demetriades; João G Ferreira; Anthony T Forbes; Pat Hutchings; Xiaoping Jia; Richard Kenchington; João Carlos Marques; Changbo Zhu
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Long-term nutrient reductions lead to the unprecedented recovery of a temperate coastal region.

Authors:  Jonathan S Lefcheck; Robert J Orth; William C Dennison; David J Wilcox; Rebecca R Murphy; Jennifer Keisman; Cassie Gurbisz; Michael Hannam; J Brooke Landry; Kenneth A Moore; Christopher J Patrick; Jeremy Testa; Donald E Weller; Richard A Batiuk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture.

Authors:  D F Boesch; R B Brinsfield; R E Magnien
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Surface water quality is improving due to declining atmospheric N deposition.

Authors:  Keith N Eshleman; Robert D Sabo; Kathleen M Kline
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Decadal-scale export of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment from the Susquehanna River basin, USA: Analysis and synthesis of temporal and spatial patterns.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; William P Ball; Douglas L Moyer
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Long-term seasonal trends of nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended sediment load from the non-tidal Susquehanna River Basin to Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  Q Zhang; D C Brady; W P Ball
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Variable climatic conditions dominate recent phytoplankton dynamics in Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  Lawrence W Harding; Michael E Mallonee; Elgin S Perry; W David Miller; Jason E Adolf; Charles L Gallegos; Hans W Paerl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Development of a multimetric water quality Indicator for tracking progress towards the achievement of Chesapeake Bay water quality standards.

Authors:  Ana L Hernandez Cordero; Peter J Tango; Richard A Batiuk
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Beyond Bioextraction: The Role of Oyster-Mediated Denitrification in Nutrient Management.

Authors:  Suzanne Ayvazian; Kate Mulvaney; Chester Zarnoch; Monica Palta; Julie Reichert-Nguyen; Sean McNally; Margaret Pilaro; Aaron Jones; Chip Terry; Robinson W Fulweiler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Challenges in Quantifying Air-Water Carbon Dioxide Flux Using Estuarine Water Quality Data: Case Study for Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  Maria Herrmann; Raymond G Najjar; Fei Da; Jaclyn R Friedman; Marjorie A M Friedrichs; Sreece Goldberger; Alana Menendez; Elizabeth H Shadwick; Edward G Stets; Pierre St-Laurent
Journal:  J Geophys Res Oceans       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Chesapeake Bay Dissolved Oxygen Criterion Attainment Deficit: Three Decades of Temporal and Spatial Patterns.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Peter J Tango; Rebecca R Murphy; Melinda K Forsyth; Richard Tian; Jennifer Keisman; Emily M Trentacoste
Journal:  Front Mar Sci       Date:  2018

5.  Abundant and persistent sulfur-oxidizing microbial populations are responsive to hypoxia in the Chesapeake Bay.

Authors:  Keith Arora-Williams; Christopher Holder; Maeve Secor; Hugh Ellis; Meng Xia; Anand Gnanadesikan; Sarah P Preheim
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 5.476

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.