Literature DB >> 18715596

Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide.

Angel Borja1, Suzanne B Bricker, Daniel M Dauer, Nicolette T Demetriades, João G Ferreira, Anthony T Forbes, Pat Hutchings, Xiaoping Jia, Richard Kenchington, João Carlos Marques, Changbo Zhu.   

Abstract

In recent years, several sets of legislation worldwide (Oceans Act in USA, Australia or Canada; Water Framework Directive or Marine Strategy in Europe, National Water Act in South Africa, etc.) have been developed in order to address ecological quality or integrity, within estuarine and coastal systems. Most such legislation seeks to define quality in an integrative way, by using several biological elements, together with physico-chemical and pollution elements. Such an approach allows assessment of ecological status at the ecosystem level ('ecosystem approach' or 'holistic approach' methodologies), rather than at species level (e.g. mussel biomonitoring or Mussel Watch) or just at chemical level (i.e. quality objectives) alone. Increasing attention has been paid to the development of tools for different physico-chemical or biological (phytoplankton, zooplankton, benthos, algae, phanerogams, fishes) elements of the ecosystems. However, few methodologies integrate all the elements into a single evaluation of a water body. The need for such integrative tools to assess ecosystem quality is very important, both from a scientific and stakeholder point of view. Politicians and managers need information from simple and pragmatic, but scientifically sound methodologies, in order to show to society the evolution of a zone (estuary, coastal area, etc.), taking into account human pressures or recovery processes. These approaches include: (i) multidisciplinarity, inherent in the teams involved in their implementation; (ii) integration of biotic and abiotic factors; (iii) accurate and validated methods in determining ecological integrity; and (iv) adequate indicators to follow the evolution of the monitored ecosystems. While some countries increasingly use the establishment of marine parks to conserve marine biodiversity and ecological integrity, there is awareness (e.g. in Australia) that conservation and management of marine ecosystems cannot be restricted to Marine Protected Areas but must include areas outside such reserves. This contribution reviews the current situation of integrative ecological assessment worldwide, by presenting several examples from each of the continents: Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe and North America.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18715596     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  14 in total

1.  Challenges and difficulties in assessing the environmental status under the requirements of the Ecosystem Approach in North African countries, illustrated by eutrophication assessment.

Authors:  Maialen Garmendia; Ángel Borja; Françoise Breton; Momme Butenschön; Anna Marín; Peter I Miller; François Morisseau; Weidong Xu
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Regional status assessment of stony corals in the US Virgin Islands.

Authors:  William S Fisher; Leska S Fore; Leah M Oliver; Charles Lobue; Robert Quarles; Jed Campbell; Peggy Harris; Becky Hemmer; Sherry Vickery; Mel Parsons; Aaron Hutchins; Kent Bernier; Danny Rodriguez; Patricia Bradley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Assessing watercourse quality: challenges in implementing European and Swiss legal frameworks.

Authors:  Marianne Milano; Nathalie Chèvre; Emmanuel Reynard
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Land use change modeling through scenario-based cellular automata Markov: improving spatial forecasting.

Authors:  Fatemeh Jahanishakib; Seyed Hamed Mirkarimi; Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny; Fatemeh Poodat
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Chesapeake Bay's water quality condition has been recovering: Insights from a multimetric indicator assessment of thirty years of tidal monitoring data.

Authors:  Qian Zhang; Rebecca R Murphy; Richard Tian; Melinda K Forsyth; Emily M Trentacoste; Jennifer Keisman; Peter J Tango
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  The mismatch of bioaccumulated trace metals (Cu, Pb and Zn) in field and transplanted oysters (Saccostrea glomerata) to ambient surficial sediments and suspended particulate matter in a highly urbanised estuary (Sydney estuary, Australia).

Authors:  Jung-Ho Lee; Gavin F Birch
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Genes of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in Mytilus galloprovincialis.

Authors:  Noelia Estévez-Calvar; Alejandro Romero; Antonio Figueras; Beatriz Novoa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Behavioural ecotoxicology, an "early warning" signal to assess environmental quality.

Authors:  Jocelyne Hellou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Wave Glider Monitoring of Sediment Transport and Dredge Plumes in a Shallow Marine Sandbank Environment.

Authors:  Vera Van Lancker; Matthias Baeye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Polychaete richness and abundance enhanced in anthropogenically modified estuaries despite high concentrations of toxic contaminants.

Authors:  Katherine A Dafforn; Brendan P Kelaher; Stuart L Simpson; Melinda A Coleman; Pat A Hutchings; Graeme F Clark; Nathan A Knott; Martina A Doblin; Emma L Johnston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.