Vanessa Petruo1, Benjamin Bodmer1, Valerie C Brandt2, Leoni Baumung2, Veit Roessner1, Alexander Münchau2, Christian Beste1. 1. Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 2. Department of Pediatric and Adult Movement Disorders and Neuropsychiatry, Institute of Neurogenetics, Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome (GTS) is a multifaceted neuropsychiatric developmental disorder with onset in childhood or adolescence and frequent remissions in early adulthood. A rather new emerging concept of this syndrome suggests that it is a disorder of purposeful actions, in which sensory processes and their relation to motor responses (actions) play a particularly important role. Thus, this syndrome might be conceived as a condition of altered 'perception-action binding'. In the current study, we test this novel concept in the context of inhibitory control. METHODS: We examined N = 35 adolescent GTS patients and N = 39 healthy controls in a Go/Nogo-task manipulating the complexity of sensory information triggering identical actions; i.e. to inhibit a motor response. This was combined with event-related potential recordings, EEG data decomposition and source localization. RESULTS: GTS patients showed worse performance compared to controls and larger performance differences when inhibitory control had to be exerted using unimodal visual compared to bimodal auditory-visual stimuli. This suggests increased binding between bimodal stimuli and responses leading to increased costs of switching between responses instructed by bimodal and those instructed by unimodal stimuli. The neurophysiological data showed that this was related to mechanisms mediating between stimulus evaluation and response selection; i.e. perception-action binding processes in the right inferior parietal cortex (BA40). CONCLUSIONS: Stimulus-action inhibition binding is stronger in GTS patients than healthy controls and affects inhibitory control corroborating the concept suggesting that GTS might be a condition of altered perception-action integration (binding); i.e. a disorder of purposeful actions.
BACKGROUND:Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome (GTS) is a multifaceted neuropsychiatric developmental disorder with onset in childhood or adolescence and frequent remissions in early adulthood. A rather new emerging concept of this syndrome suggests that it is a disorder of purposeful actions, in which sensory processes and their relation to motor responses (actions) play a particularly important role. Thus, this syndrome might be conceived as a condition of altered 'perception-action binding'. In the current study, we test this novel concept in the context of inhibitory control. METHODS: We examined N = 35 adolescent GTSpatients and N = 39 healthy controls in a Go/Nogo-task manipulating the complexity of sensory information triggering identical actions; i.e. to inhibit a motor response. This was combined with event-related potential recordings, EEG data decomposition and source localization. RESULTS:GTSpatients showed worse performance compared to controls and larger performance differences when inhibitory control had to be exerted using unimodal visual compared to bimodal auditory-visual stimuli. This suggests increased binding between bimodal stimuli and responses leading to increased costs of switching between responses instructed by bimodal and those instructed by unimodal stimuli. The neurophysiological data showed that this was related to mechanisms mediating between stimulus evaluation and response selection; i.e. perception-action binding processes in the right inferior parietal cortex (BA40). CONCLUSIONS: Stimulus-action inhibition binding is stronger in GTSpatients than healthy controls and affects inhibitory control corroborating the concept suggesting that GTS might be a condition of altered perception-action integration (binding); i.e. a disorder of purposeful actions.
Authors: Marie Luise Schreiter; Witold X Chmielewski; Jamie Ward; Christian Beste Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Simon Morand-Beaulieu; Stephanie D Smith; Karim Ibrahim; Jia Wu; James F Leckman; Michael J Crowley; Denis G Sukhodolsky Journal: Cortex Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: Vanessa Petruo; Benjamin Bodmer; Annet Bluschke; Alexander Münchau; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Elena Eggert; Annet Bluschke; Adam Takacs; Maximilian Kleimaker; Alexander Münchau; Veit Roessner; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Julia Friedrich; Henriette Spaleck; Ronja Schappert; Maximilian Kleimaker; Julius Verrel; Tobias Bäumer; Christian Beste; Alexander Münchau Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Charlotte L Rae; Liliana Polyanska; Cassandra D Gould van Praag; Jim Parkinson; Samira Bouyagoub; Yoko Nagai; Anil K Seth; Neil A Harrison; Sarah N Garfinkel; Hugo D Critchley Journal: Brain Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Adam Takacs; Nicolas Zink; Nicole Wolff; Alexander Münchau; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 5.038