The special picrosirius red staining highlights the natural birefringence of collagen fibers when exposed to polarized light. The results from birefringence allow to evaluate the organization of the collagen fibers in the tissues. The authors intend to elucidate all steps to obtain and capture images of histological sections stained with picrosirius red and evaluated under polarized light microscopy, as well as possible artefacts that may occur.
The special picrosirius red staining highlights the natural birefringence of collagen fibers when exposed to polarized light. The results from birefringence allow to evaluate the organization of the collagen fibers in the tissues. The authors intend to elucidate all steps to obtain and capture images of histological sections stained with picrosirius red and evaluated under polarized light microscopy, as well as possible artefacts that may occur.
Collagen, the main dermal constituent, can be analyzed or quantified through different
techniques such as immunohistochemistry, confocal microscopy, polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) and multiple stains: Masson’s trichrome, picrosirius red, Weigert-van Gieson
stain, Verhoeff.[1-7] Even though the staining methods are not considered
highly specific as the techniques mentioned, they can be quickly performed and have a
low cost. Thus, it is important to be aware of the limitations of each stain. In this
study, we will approach the main steps used to capture images from histologic sections
stained with picrosirius red and analyzed under polarized light microscopy.The special dye picrosirius red has the ability to enhance the natural
birefringence of the collagen when exposed to polarized light. Collagen type I would
show a yellow-red color, while type III would be green.[8] On the other hand, Lattouf et
al.[9] stated that this
special stain highlights the configuration of the collagen and the heterogeneity of the
direction of the fibers in the tissues, with no differentiation between the types (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Photomicrographs of healthy canine (A, C, E) and equine
(B, D, F) skin stained with picrosirius red, with a
standardized program for image capture. Skin evaluated without polarized
microscopy (A and B) and with polarized light, allowing for the
observation of all its constituents (C and D) (x40).
Birefringence of hair (green tones) and collagen (E and F)
(x100). Ep: epidermis; D: dermis; Gs: sebaceous glands; Gp: sweat glands; *:
hairs; arrowhead: arrector pili muscle
Photomicrographs of healthy canine (A, C, E) and equine
(B, D, F) skin stained with picrosirius red, with a
standardized program for image capture. Skin evaluated without polarized
microscopy (A and B) and with polarized light, allowing for the
observation of all its constituents (C and D) (x40).
Birefringence of hair (green tones) and collagen (E and F)
(x100). Ep: epidermis; D: dermis; Gs: sebaceous glands; Gp: sweat glands; *:
hairs; arrowhead: arrector pili muscleDespite the advantages of the use of special stains, at present, it is difficult to
obtain polarized images of the collagen in histologic sections with picrosirius red. In
this context, the objective of this manuscript was to elucidate all steps to obtain
photomicrographs highlighting the birefringence of the collagen, using intact skin from
two different species. The samples of skin used were canine and equine, from projects
approved by the Ethics Committee in the Use of Animals (Ceua), Universidade Federal de
Viçosa (UFV) under the records 78/2014 e 1/2017, respectively.Histologic sections were stained with the commercial kit (Erviegas Instrumental
Cirúrgico Ltda, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), and analyzed with an optical
microscope Olympus BX-50® (Japan), that was attached to the camera
Olympus QColor 3 (Brazeiss Representações Ltda, São Paulo, SP,
Brazil). The program for capture of images used was QCapture Pro 6 (Version 6.0.0.605,
Qimaging, Canada - https://www.qimaging.com/support/downloads/qcappro60.php).Light emits rays that are dispersed in all directions; when it is polarized, only rays of
specific directions pass over the polarizers. For this to occur, it is necessary to
adapt filters to the microscope. The first filter, located between the light source and
the condenser, can rotate 360º. In the microscope Olympus
BX-50®, the filter is the U-POT (polarizer of transmitted light,
Olympus, Japan).[10] The second filter,
located between the revolving nosepiece and the observation tube, has a lower ability of
rotation. For the microscope used, it is U-ANT (analyzer of transmitted light, Olympus,
Japan).[10]It is important that the condenser and the iris diaphragm are open, allowing for the
passage of light. In the same way, it is important to observe neutral density filters
(ND6 and ND25) and the daylight blue filter (LBD): when present, LBD and ND6 should be
open, while ND25 should remain closed.The next step is to configure the program for image capture and the microscope light,
since the field darkens with the addition of the polarizing filters, leading to a higher
light requirement. In this study, the intensity of the light beam of the microscope used
for analysis under polarized light was 11. The program’s configuration is related to
capture balance (gain, gamma, offset) and to
white balance [red (R);
green (G); blue (B)], and the variation
found is associated to the tissue, the stain and the management of the polarized light.
The program’s values, as well as those used for canine and equine skin were:
gain: 1, 1.850 and 2.330; gamma: 1.000, 1.000 and
1.000 - 1.110; offset: 0, -531 - -630 and -430 - -630;
red: 1, 1.6 - 2 and 1.8 - 2.0; green: 1.23, 1.4 -
1.8 and 1.6 - 1.8; blue: 2.38, 1.3 and 1.3 - 2.605, respectively.The values used for standardization of the image capture program should aim to a very
black background, and the colors red and green from the birefringence should be very
bright. Figure 2 shows an example of how the
adequate configuration of the program influences the final result of the image obtained.
It is important to remember that it is necessary to calculate the program’s light
exposure every time the objective, the slide and the amount of light are changed.
Figure 2
Photomicrographs of dog skin stained with picrosirius red and analyzed in
three different ways. Microscopy with non-polarized light (A)
and polarized light microscopy with the program QCapture Pro 6 standardized
by the authors and with automatic configuration, respectively (B and
C) (picrosirius red, x40)
Photomicrographs of dog skin stained with picrosirius red and analyzed in
three different ways. Microscopy with non-polarized light (A)
and polarized light microscopy with the program QCapture Pro 6 standardized
by the authors and with automatic configuration, respectively (B and
C) (picrosirius red, x40)After the filters are adapted to the microscope and the capture program is standardized,
the fields should be focused under non-polarized light, and the polarization should be
achieved by turning the filter U-POT to an angle of 90º. During rotation,
birefringence becomes evident and the background darkens until it becomes completely
black (Figure 3).[3] after polarization, the focus should once again be
corrected to avoid loss of details.
Figure 3
Photomicrographs of equine (A, C and E) and canine (B, D
and F) skin sections during light polarization with the rotation
of the filter U-POT. Approximate angle of 60º (A and B),
80º (C and D) and 90º (E and F).
During this process, we can observe the gradual change in the background (*)
and of the birefringence (arrow) (picrosirius red, x200)
Photomicrographs of equine (A, C and E) and canine (B, D
and F) skin sections during light polarization with the rotation
of the filter U-POT. Approximate angle of 60º (A and B),
80º (C and D) and 90º (E and F).
During this process, we can observe the gradual change in the background (*)
and of the birefringence (arrow) (picrosirius red, x200)The excessive rotation of the filter U-POT, above 90º, can alter the color of the
collagen fibers with color inversion (green to red or red to green) or even loss of
birefringence. To avoid this alteration, which can result in false results, we suggest
that the rotation be performed gradually so as to follow the darkening of the field and
the birefringence of the collagen fibers (Figure
4).
Figure 4
Photomicrographs showing inversion (fine arrow) and loss of birefringence
(thick arrow) of the collagen fiber. Photomicrographs of canine (A and
B) and equine (C, D, E and F) skin stained with
picrosirius red obtained by polarization in a standardized program (x200).
Note the change in the tone of the birefringence of the collagen fibers with
a rotation above 90º of the filter U-POT (B, D and F),
whereas in the remaining images (A, C and E) the rotation
corresponds to 90º
Photomicrographs showing inversion (fine arrow) and loss of birefringence
(thick arrow) of the collagen fiber. Photomicrographs of canine (A and
B) and equine (C, D, E and F) skin stained with
picrosirius red obtained by polarization in a standardized program (x200).
Note the change in the tone of the birefringence of the collagen fibers with
a rotation above 90º of the filter U-POT (B, D and F),
whereas in the remaining images (A, C and E) the rotation
corresponds to 90ºDuring the analysis of the images obtained from histologic sections stained with
picrosirius red, some artefacts can be seen, such as, for example,
folds and granules of hematoxylin that can interfere with the final analysis if they
become or not birefringent due to the overlap of section parts (Figure 5). Due to these possible alterations, we recommend avoiding
fields with these artefacts that can lead to mistakes during the capture of the
images.
Figure 5
Folded histologic section in equine skin. Photomicrograph evaluated under
polarization with an approximate rotation of 60º (A) and
90º (B) of the filter U-POT. Note the absence of
birefringence (thick arrow) (picrosirius red, x200)
Folded histologic section in equine skin. Photomicrograph evaluated under
polarization with an approximate rotation of 60º (A) and
90º (B) of the filter U-POT. Note the absence of
birefringence (thick arrow) (picrosirius red, x200)Finally, the images obtained taking the suggestions in this manuscript into consideration
can be analyzed in a reliable way by the morphometry technique or by programs of color
segmentation, such as those used by Miot and Brianezi[2] and by Bedoya et al.[5]
Authors: Amber T Collins; Guoli Hu; Hunter Newman; Michael H Reinsvold; Monique R Goldsmith; John N Twomey-Kozak; Holly A Leddy; Deepika Sharma; Leyao Shen; Louis E DeFrate; Courtney M Karner Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Saulo Henrique Salviano; João Carlos Amorim Lopes; Igor da Silva Brum; Lúcio Frigo; Mario José Dos Santos; Sílvio Roberto Consonni; Jorge José de Carvalho Journal: Int Med Case Rep J Date: 2021-09-29
Authors: Julie S Di Martino; Ana Rita Nobre; Chandrani Mondal; Isra Taha; Eduardo F Farias; Elana J Fertig; Alexandra Naba; Julio A Aguirre-Ghiso; Jose Javier Bravo-Cordero Journal: Nat Cancer Date: 2021-12-13
Authors: Lingjia Liu; Wenbo Cheng; Di Wu; Luxia Chen; Shasha Yu; Tong Zuo; Lin Zhang; Kun Yang; Hua Li; Hui Zhang; Pinghui Wei; Alex Lap Ki Ng; George Pak-Man Cheng; Victor Chi-Pang Woo; Jia Yin; Kin Chiu; Yan Wang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Susanne G Pondorfer; Maximilian W M Wintergerst; Shekoufeh Gorgi Zadeh; Thomas Schultz; Manuel Heinemann; Frank G Holz; Robert P Finger Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 4.799