BACKGROUND: Melanoma is one of the conditions with greater increase in incidence worldwide in recent decades. It is a skin cancer with potential high lethality and predominates in Caucasian adults. Treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma is essentially surgical and search for sentinel lymph node can modify the aggressiveness of the treatment. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the epidemiological profile of patients diagnosed with primary cutaneous melanoma, histopathological features and compare with literature data. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, single-center, case series study of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma, who underwent surgery between January 2008 and December 2013. The parameters include: Age, sex, clinical stage, date of surgery, tumor location, histological subtype, condition of surgical margins, Breslow thickness, mitotic index, presence of ulceration and metastasis on admission. RESULTS: We included 321 melanoma patients who were treated at Hospital Erasto Gaertner. The population consisted of 58.9% females and 41.1% males with an average age of 52.8 ± 16.3 years. As for the clinical stage, 51.1% were in the initial stage, 24.3% in the clinical stage II (A, B and C), 21.2% in clinical stage III and 3.4% with distant metastases. The most frequent location of the primary melanoma was the trunk, and the histological subtype was superficial spreading pattern. Intermediate and thick melanomas were the most frequent. STUDY LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study and some information and data could be incomplete or absent. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis and treatment of melanoma in early stages provides less morbidity and improved survival of patients. Understanding the biological behavior of tumor and knowing the local epidemiology guide health strategies.
BACKGROUND:Melanoma is one of the conditions with greater increase in incidence worldwide in recent decades. It is a skin cancer with potential high lethality and predominates in Caucasian adults. Treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma is essentially surgical and search for sentinel lymph node can modify the aggressiveness of the treatment. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the epidemiological profile of patients diagnosed with primary cutaneous melanoma, histopathological features and compare with literature data. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational, single-center, case series study of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma, who underwent surgery between January 2008 and December 2013. The parameters include: Age, sex, clinical stage, date of surgery, tumor location, histological subtype, condition of surgical margins, Breslow thickness, mitotic index, presence of ulceration and metastasis on admission. RESULTS: We included 321 melanomapatients who were treated at Hospital Erasto Gaertner. The population consisted of 58.9% females and 41.1% males with an average age of 52.8 ± 16.3 years. As for the clinical stage, 51.1% were in the initial stage, 24.3% in the clinical stage II (A, B and C), 21.2% in clinical stage III and 3.4% with distant metastases. The most frequent location of the primary melanoma was the trunk, and the histological subtype was superficial spreading pattern. Intermediate and thick melanomas were the most frequent. STUDY LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study and some information and data could be incomplete or absent. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis and treatment of melanoma in early stages provides less morbidity and improved survival of patients. Understanding the biological behavior of tumor and knowing the local epidemiology guide health strategies.
Melanoma originates from the malignant transformation of melanocytes and is more
predominant in Caucasian adults. This type of cancer can occur in any part of the
body or any organ, however, cutaneous involvement is much more common
(91.2%).[1] Cutaneous
melanoma represents 4% of tumors on the skin, has a high mortality, however, its
incidence is low (2,960 new cases in men and 2,930 in women). The highest estimated
rates in Brazil in men and women are seen in the South region. Its incidence has
increased considerably over the last decades. In Brazil, the estimation of new cases
was of 5,670 in 2016.[2]The high level of clinical suspicion to detect the condition in its early stages
restricted the increase in the mortality of this condition (around 85% in stages I
and II).[3,4]Treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma is essentially surgical, where the margins
are defined radially between 1cm - 4cm, according to the thickness of the
lesion.[5,6] If surgical treatment of the primary lesion is not
possible, other treatment modalities have been studied such as
radiotherapy.[7]Sentinel lymph node was introduced by Morton et al. in 1992, and
since 1998 it has been utilized in melanoma staging. Currently, it is recommended
for lesions thicker than 0.76mm, with a mitotic index above1 and/or ulcerated
lesions of 1 mm or larger and clinical examination with no evidence of lymph node
enlargement.[8-10]Understanding the biological behavior of the tumor and knowing the local epidemiology
guide health strategies. Early diagnosis by a high index of clinical suspicion
changes the outcome and the expenses with public health.The objective of this study is to analyze the profile of patients with the diagnosis
of primary cutaneous melanoma seen at the Service of Skin and Melanoma at Hospital
Erasto Gaertner, the characteristics of the tumor and to compare them with data in
the literature.
METHODS
This is a retrospective, observational, single center case series study based on the
collection of data from patients’ files with primary cutaneous melanoma who
underwent surgical treatment between January 2008 and December 2013. The series of
cases is comprised of the experience of the Service of Skin and Melanoma at Hospital
Erasto Gaertner. Initially, 383 patients were analyzed based on a diagnostic search;
62 patients were excluded because they did not meet all inclusion
criteria, with 321 patients left for the analysis in the study (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Patients included in the study
Patients included in the studyThe patients included in the study had a histopathological diagnosis of cutaneous
melanoma and were seen at Hospital Erasto Gaertner, where they underwent surgical
treatment in the period between January 2008 and December 2013. Patients with the
diagnosis of primary cutaneous melanoma who were surgically treated in other
institution, and patients with ocular or mucosal melanoma were excluded, as well as
those with insufficient information available for the analysis of the main variables
in their files.The main parameters include: age, sex, clinical stage, date of the surgery, tumor
location, histological subtype, surgical margins, Breslow thickness and mitotic
index. The objective of the study is to correlate the parameters found in simple
patients with the current literature, define the epidemiological profile and compare
the sample with data from the Brazilian population.In our service, patients referred from primary care either with a diagnosis by a
biopsy performed elsewhere or by a suspicious lesion are included in a flowchart for
melanoma treatment. All lesions suspicious for melanoma are submitted to excisional
biopsy with a 1-2mm margin. Incisional biopsy of pigmented lesions is considered in
exceptional circumstances. Pathological diagnosis with the biopsy guides definitive
treatment. After the diagnosis of invasive melanoma, patients are staged with
abdominal ultrasound (US), chest x-ray, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH). For patients with an increased risk of metastasis, staging is
performed with tomography. Further exams are performed individually depending on
clinical abnormalities. For patients with no metastatic disease, primary cutaneous
melanoma with a thickness of < 0.75mm, the treatment consists in a wider excision
with surgical margins of at least 1 cm. Since it is a retrospective study, at the
time of the study, for melanomas with a thickness of 0.75mm or more, a sentinel
lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was performed and the wider excision had surgical margins
of at least 2cm. Wider excision of surgical margins is standardized and the
resection has a trapezoid configuration, in a way that the subcutaneous tissue is
removed with wider safety margins. The deep level is limited to the deep fascia,
included. Closure is performed with primary advancement, flap or skin graft.For SLNB, patients undergo lymphoscintigraphy the day prior to the surgery. Patients
are operated on in the morning with the technique of patent blue marking. The
sentinel lymph node is prepared with hematoxylin & eosin (H.E.). For patients
with macroscopic involvement of the sentinel lymph node, resection of the lymph node
chain if indicated. In cases of sentinel lymph node without macroscopic involvement,
a immunohistochemical panel is performed to evaluate micro metastasis which, if
present, is an indication for routine lymph node removal.The decision regarding adjuvant treatment is made according to the criteria of the
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Isolated
metastasis that can be treated surgically are individually evaluated and the
resection of the lesions is as recommended by the literature.In our institution, the follow-up of melanomapatients is performed with periodical
clinical consultations and follow-up exams such as: abdominal US, chest x-ray, ALP
and LDH for the earlier stages. Further exams are requested according to the
clinical symptoms of the patients. The staging system used was from the American
Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), 7th edition, 2010.The research project was assessed and approved by the committee of ethics in research
(CEP) of the Hospital Erasto Gaertner, number CAAE 32157214.5.0000.0098.Informed consent was not needed because the analysis of the data was purely
retrospective.The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v.20. Categorical
variables were described by frequency and percentage. For the age, mean ±
standard deviation was shown. LDH and ALP were described by median and quartiles.
For the comparison of the clinical stages regarding LDH and ALP, the nonparametric
test of Kruskal-Wallis was used. The association between metastasis on admission and
the mitotic index was evaluated using the chi-square test. The values of p < 0.05
indicated statistical significance.
RESULTS
In total, 383 patients were analyzed and from those, 62 patients did not meet the
inclusion criteria and were removed from the sample. In the final study, 321
patients were included, who had cutaneous melanoma and were treated in the period
between January 2008 and December 2013.In regards to the gender of the patients, 58.9% were female and 41.1% were male. The
mean age was 52.8 ± 16.3 years (ranging from 10 to 89 years with a median of
52 years). The distribution of the initial clinical stages and the thickness of the
cutaneous melanoma (Breslow) are shown in table
1.
Table 1
Percentage and numerical distribution of the patients according to the
clinical stage (AJCC) and Breslow thickness. NR = not included in the
pathology report
Variable
n
%
Clinical stage
0
37
11.5
IA
76
23.7
IB
51
15.9
IIA
27
8.4
IIB
28
8.7
IIC
23
7.2
IIIA
12
3.7
IIIB
24
7.5
IIIC
32
10.0
IV
11
3.4
Breslow thickness (mm)
<1.0
103
32.1
1.01 - 2.00
63
19.6
2.01 - 4.00
44
13.7
>4.00
71
22.1
In situ
33
10.3
NR*
7
2.2
Percentage and numerical distribution of the patients according to the
clinical stage (AJCC) and Breslow thickness. NR = not included in the
pathology reportThe most frequent site of the primary melanoma was the trunk (42.4%), followed by the
head (20.1%), upper and lower limbs (16.7% and 15.5%), foot and hand (4.6% and
0.6%).The analysis of the histopathological subtype of the patients showed that most
patients head the superficial spreading melanoma subtype (48%). The other
histological types were as follows: nodular (35%), lentigo maligna (4.6%), acral
(3.7%), in situ (3.7%) and desmoplastic (0.6%). Other histological
types found were: melanocarcinoma, verrucous melanoma, and amelanotic melanoma. The
distribution of the frequency of the histological types and their anatomical site
are illustrated in graph 1. The
application of a statistical test to infer about the association between the
histological type and the anatomical site was not possible because the number of
cases in some combinations of the two variables is very small. The presence of
ulceration was observed in 32.7% of the cases. Satellitosis was found
in only 8.1% of melanomas.
Graph 1
Representation of the frequency of the histological type by anatomical
sites. Histological types: SS = superficial spreading; NO = nodular; LM
= lentigo maligna; AC = acral; DE = desmoplastic; MELANOC =
melanocarcinoma; IN SITU= in situ; VERRUCO = verrucous; AM = amelanotic;
NR = not reported. Anatomical sites: HN = head and neck; TR = trunk; UL
= upper limb; LL = lower limb; HA = hand; FO = foot
Representation of the frequency of the histological type by anatomical
sites. Histological types: SS = superficial spreading; NO = nodular; LM
= lentigo maligna; AC = acral; DE = desmoplastic; MELANOC =
melanocarcinoma; IN SITU= in situ; VERRUCO = verrucous; AM = amelanotic;
NR = not reported. Anatomical sites: HN = head and neck; TR = trunk; UL
= upper limb; LL = lower limb; HA = hand; FO = footAt the time of diagnosis, the median of LDH was 461 with interquartile amplitude of
397 to 532 (mean of. A539.7), LDH data available in 218 patients. Median for ALP was
74 with interquartile amplitude of 61 to 92 (mean of 83.7), data available in 204
patients. When comparing clinical stages to LDH, a significant difference (p =
0.009) was found, with the clinical stage IV significantly different from the others
(p < 0.005 in the comparisons of clinical stages two by two I, II and III
exhibited the same behavior). No statistical difference was found between clinical
stages in relation to ALP (p = 0.266).The distribution by clinical stage is found in table
2.
Table 2
LDH and ALP values at the time of diagnosis. Median (1st quartile – 3rd
quartile)
CS
LDH
ALP
0
456 (395 - 512)
69 (61 - 78)
I
463 (393 - 541)
72 (61 - 93)
II
451 (392 - 517)
72 (60 - 92)
III
461 (406 - 532)
75 (61 - 88)
IV
666 (523 - 843)
92 (71 - 94)
LDH and ALP values at the time of diagnosis. Median (1st quartile – 3rd
quartile)SLNB was necessary in 201 patients (62.6%). Removal of the main drainage lymph node
chain was performed in 83 patients (25.9%). The presence of lymph node
micrometastasis was of 7%. All surgical margins of the wider excisions were free of
the tumor.The presence of metastasis on admission was seen in 11 patients (3.4%), the affected
sites were: lungs, liver, central nervous system, adrenal, spleen, pancreas,
retroperitoneum and bones. Enlarged lymph nodes on the initial clinical examination
was seen in 30 patients.Regarding the mitotic index evaluated in the samples, in 39.2%, there was no mitoses.
The presence of one mitosis was found in 46 cases (148%), more than one to six
mitoses in 75 cases (24.1%), more than six mitoses in 68 cases (21.9%). No
significant association between the mitotic index and the presence of metastasis was
found (p = 0.965) (Table 3).
Table 3
Metastasis on admission and mitotic index
Mitotic index
No metastasis
With metastasis
n
%
n
%
0
119
39.1%
3
42.9%
1
45
14.8%
1
14.3%
2 to 6
73
24.0%
2
28.6%
> 6
67
22.0%
1
14.3%
Metastasis on admission and mitotic index
DISCUSSION
Understanding the profile of the patient affected by melanoma is extremely important
for the early diagnosis, as the prognosis worsens considerably for patients in more
advanced stages. Because it is initially asymptomatic, early diagnosis is extremely
difficult, with detection rates by the patients around 50% of cases.[11,12] In our study, there was a higher proportion of women
diagnosed with melanoma (58.6% women vs 41.7% men), with a ratio of 1.4 woman for
each man with melanoma, a feature that is distinct from what is found in the
literature, where the ratio is around 1M:1F, with a tendency of an increase in cases
in males.[2,12] In the USA, according to data from the
National Cancer Institute, the incidence in the years 2008-2012
was of 28.2 cases/100,000 people in men to 16.8 cases/100,000 people in women.During the period from 2008 to 2013, the age of the affected patients in the study
was homogeneous, with a mean of 52.8 years (10-89 years) and around 40% between 50
and 69 years. Men had a more advanced age at diagnosis than women (means of 55.7
± 14.9 and 50.8 ± 17.0 years, respectively).Early diagnosis changes the natural history of the disease, patients in early stages
(IA and IB) have a 10-year survival of around 90%.[4] In our study, 39.6% of the patients were in this
group. In clinical stages II (A, B and C), 24.3% of the patients were included and
in stage III, there were 21.2% of the patients studied. The patients with the
diagnosis of advanced disease, with distant metastasis, comprised 3.4%. A survey of
the histopathological reports from 1999 to 2004 in the state of Santa Catarina
demonstrated approximately 30% of patients with melanoma had stages I and
II.[13] In contrast, in the
United Kingdom, data from the Cancer Research UK showed that around
80% of the patients at the time of diagnosis were in those same stages.The histological subtype most commonly found was superficial spreading, with 48%,
followed by the nodular and lentigo maligna types (38% and 6%), also found by many
authors.[14-16] The nodular subtype characterizes by an initial
vertical growth, thicker Breslow and consequently a higher risk for regional and
distant involvement. Thick tumors were predominantly nodular (77%, 55/71). The
lentigo maligna subtype was seen in patients with more advance age. Our sample size
is quite relevant, of the surveys performed in the state of Paraná till now,
it has the larger number of cases. It reveals a rate of intermediate and thick
melanomas, a total of 55.4%, and thin of 42.4%. in the city of Londrina-PR, it was
also found that around 70% of the tumors had a Clark III and IV level of
invasion.[17] In nationwide
studies from the South and Northeast regions, a higher percentage of thin tumors was
seen, ranging from 62 to 73%.[13,18]The values of LDH and ALP at the time of diagnosis were elevated only in stage
IV.Women were proportionately more affected with primary lesions on the lower limbs and
men on the trunk, what is compatible with the areas exposed to solar radiation. Data
already shown by other authors.[14,15,19] There was no difference regarding tumor thickness between
the sexes.SLNB was necessary in 201 patients (62.6%), and when positive, removal of the
affected lymph node chain was indicated. There is evidence that this management
increases overall survival.[20,21]Lymph node enlargement on the initial clinical examination was seen in 30 patients
(9.3%), sent to FNA or to removal of lymph nodes according to the tumor
characteristics. The correlation between thick tumors and the presence of enlarged
lymph nodes on physical examination was directly related, 80% of those had Breslow
> 2mm.Distant metastasis on admission was found in 11 patients, 3.4% of the sample, with
57% with Breslow > 4mm.The time between the diagnosis of the disease and the treatment impacts on the
prognosis. In our service, this time was on average, of 104 days, what can be
explained by the fact that in the first years of the study, the flowchart and
priority were still being implemented.The patients analyzed in this study continue follow -up in our institution and will
be evaluated regarding the oncologic outcome of the treatment performed.
CONCLUSION
Early stage melanoma diagnosis and treatment provide a lower morbidity, higher
survival, since disease control with other non-surgical therapies is poor. The
increasing number of qualified professionals, prevention campaigns and sun
protection tend to provide better early detection rates of the disease. This study
showed an analysis of the population seen in our hospital, which is reference for
the treatment of melanoma.
Authors: A Houghton; D Coit; W Bloomer; A Buzaid; D Chu; B Eisenburgh; J Guitart; T Johnson; S Miller; S Sener; K Tanabe; J Thompson; M Urist; M Walker Journal: Oncology (Williston Park) Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 2.990
Authors: C M Balch; S J Soong; J E Gershenwald; J F Thompson; D S Reintgen; N Cascinelli; M Urist; K M McMasters; M I Ross; J M Kirkwood; M B Atkins; J A Thompson; D G Coit; D Byrd; R Desmond; Y Zhang; P Y Liu; G H Lyman; A Morabito Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Donald L Morton; John F Thompson; Alistair J Cochran; Nicola Mozzillo; Robert Elashoff; Richard Essner; Omgo E Nieweg; Daniel F Roses; Harald J Hoekstra; Constantine P Karakousis; Douglas S Reintgen; Brendon J Coventry; Edwin C Glass; He-Jing Wang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-09-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C M Balch; S Soong; M I Ross; M M Urist; C P Karakousis; W J Temple; M C Mihm; R L Barnhill; W R Jewell; H J Wanebo; R Harrison Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Savina Aneja; Angela K Brimhall; Douglas R Kast; Sanjay Aneja; Diana Carlson; Kevin D Cooper; Jeremy S Bordeaux Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2012-11
Authors: Nelson Marcos Ferrari Júnior; Helena Muller; Manoel Ribeiro; Marcus Maia; José Antonio Sanches Júnior Journal: Sao Paulo Med J Date: 2008-01-02 Impact factor: 1.044
Authors: Jaime Lima Sánchez; M Sánchez Medina; O García Duque; M Fiúza Pérez; G Carreteri Hernández; J Fernández Palácios Journal: Indian J Plast Surg Date: 2013-01
Authors: Mara Huffenbaecher Giavina-Bianchi; Cyro Festa-Neto; Jose Antonio Sanches; Monica La Porte Teixeira; Bernadette Cunha Waldvogel Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 1.896