Literature DB >> 29923456

Transcription-independent expression of PKMζ in the anterior cingulate cortex contributes to chronically maintained neuropathic pain.

Hyoung-Gon Ko1, Sanghyun Ye1, Dae-Hee Han1, Pojeong Park1, Chae-Seok Lim2, Kyungmin Lee3, Min Zhuo4,5, Bong-Kiun Kaang1,5.   

Abstract

Protein kinase M ζ is well known for its role in maintaining memory and pain. Previously, we revealed that the activation of protein kinase M ζ in the anterior cingulate cortex plays a role in sustaining neuropathic pain. However, the mechanism by which protein kinase M ζ is expressed in the anterior cingulate cortex by peripheral nerve injury, and whether blocking of protein kinase M ζ using its inhibitor, zeta inhibitory peptide, produces analgesic effects in neuropathic pain maintained chronically after injury, have not previously been resolved. In this study, we show that protein kinase M ζ expression in the anterior cingulate cortex is enhanced by peripheral nerve injury in a transcription-independent manner. We also reveal that the inhibition of protein kinase M ζ through zeta inhibitory peptide treatment is enough to reduce mechanical allodynia responses in mice with one-month-old nerve injuries. However, the zeta inhibitory peptide treatment was only effective for a limited time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Protein kinase M ζ; anterior cingulate cortex; chronic pain; neuropathic pain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29923456      PMCID: PMC6024534          DOI: 10.1177/1744806918783943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pain        ISSN: 1744-8069            Impact factor:   3.395


Introduction

The question of how memory is permanently stored even though the physical traces of memory such as synaptic connections are not permanent had not been solved. An atypical protein kinase C (PKC) isoform, protein kinase M ζ (PKMζ), has recently emerged as the answer to this question.[1-4] This kinase has the unique property that it lacks a regulatory subunit. Thus, PKMζ is constitutively active once it is expressed and this feature enables this kinase to maintain memory.[5] PKMζ is necessary and sufficient for maintaining long-term potentiation (LTP) and many kinds of memories. Blocking of PKMζ using zeta inhibitory peptide (ZIP) disrupts hippocampal LTP after the induction phase.[1,6] Several types of memories such as fear, spatial, and taste aversion memories can be erased by ZIP treatment to the hippocampus, amygdala, and insular cortex.[2,5,7,8] At the molecular level, PKMζ maintains memory by keeping GluA2-containing α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) in the postsynaptic density (PSD) regions.[9-11] Neuropathic pain induced by peripheral nerve injury can lead to LTP-like changes in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a brain region known to be involved in affective dimension of pain.[12-15] The mechanism of LTP maintenance is thought to be fairly universal in the brain. Based on this similarity, we previously hypothesized that PKMζ in the ACC could mediate the maintenance of neuropathic pain and showed that peripheral nerve injury enhances the PKMζ expression in the ACC.[16,17] We also revealed that the inhibition of PKMζ in the ACC has an analgesic effect. Intriguingly, PKMζ in the ACC sustains GluA1-containing AMPAR in the PSD region. However, it has not been clearly elucidated whether ZIP is effective for treating neuropathic pain that is chronically maintained. It is also important to investigate how long the effects of ZIP continue after a single treatment. In this study, we examined whether LTP or long-term depression (LTD) stimulation of the ACC leads to PKMζ activation. We also measured the level of PKMζ mRNA in the ACC after peripheral nerve injury. In addition, we investigated the effect of ZIP on neuropathic pain induced one month prior to treatment and evaluated the duration of the effect of single ZIP treatments to the ACC.

Materials and methods

Animals

Male wild-type C57BL/6NCrljBgi mice (6–10 weeks old) were purchased from Orient Bio. The mice were maintained in a 12-h light/dark cycle. Food and water were provided ad libitum. All experiments were conducted according to the guidance of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University.

Cannula implantation and drug infusion

Guide cannulas (24 gauge) were implanted bilaterally into the ACCs of mice (+0.7 mm, ± 0.4 mm, and −1.7 mm) anesthetized with a ketamine/xylazine mixture. The mice were given at least one week to recover after cannula implantation. A 30-gauge injection cannula was then implanted 0.2 mm lower than the guide. For the intra-ACC infusion, 0.5 μl ZIP (10 nmol/μl)[16] or actinomycin D (ActD) (20 ng/μl),[18] or vehicle was delivered bilaterally within 1 min and the cannula remained for an additional 1 min after the drug microinfusion was completed. After all experiments were completed, the mice brains were processed to assess the injection site. Mice that were cannulated outside of the ACC were excluded from the analysis.

Neuropathic pain surgery

Mice were anesthetized with a ketamine/xylazine mixture (5.9:1) in saline. Their eyes were protected by artificial tear jelly or saline. The left leg of each mouse was shaven using scissors and sterilized with a 70% alcohol and povidone iodine liquid. About 1 cm of the left thigh skin was cut, exposing the muscles. An incision was made in the muscle using scissors, and sterile saline was applied to the exposed region. Next, the common peroneal nerve (CPN) was ligated with a wax-coated braided silk suture 4–0 without disturbing or including the blood vessel. The ligature was slowly tightened until twitching of the dorsiflexors of the foot became visible at the digit. After making a knot, the skin was sutured using a 5–0 silk suture and cleaned with povidone iodine liquid. In a few cases, the mice did not show any allodynia response three days after CPN ligation. These mice were therefore excluded from further experiments.

Measurement of mechanical allodynia response

Mechanical allodynia responses were measured essentially as described previously.[19] The mice were placed in individual cylinders and allowed to acclimatize for 1 h prior to testing. Mechanical allodynia was assessed based on the responsiveness of the hind paw to the application of a von Frey filament to the point of bending. Positive responses included licking, biting, and sudden withdrawal of the hind paw. Mechanical pressure from a 1.65 filament (force, 0.008g) was used to test the mice’s mechanical allodynia nine times with inter-trial intervals of 5 min. The animals were then permitted to rest for 2 h after drug infusion, and their mechanical allodynia was retested. All behavioral experiments were performed by a blind experimenter.

Subcellular fractionation for PSD fraction

The purification of PSD fraction was performed essentially as described previously.[20] The CPN-ligated mice were anesthetized and decapitated 2 h after ZIP infusion. Three slices (400 μm) of the ACC region near the infusion site were collected per mouse. Six of the ACC slices were used for fractionation. Briefly, the slices were homogenized in Frac buffer (30 mM pH 7.4 Tris-Cl, 4 mM EDTA, and 1 mM EGTA) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail. The homogenates were centrifuged at 500g, at 4°C for 5 min, twice, to remove the nucleus fraction and debris. The supernatants were centrifuged at 100,000g for 1 h at 4°C, and the pellet was lysed using Frac buffer containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and a protease inhibitor cocktail. After incubation for 20 min on ice, the lysates were carefully loaded onto the surface of 1 M sucrose and then centrifuged at 100,000g for 1 h at 4°C. The pellet (PSD fraction) was used for blotting after which it had been lysed using PSD lysis buffer (1 M pH 7.4 HEPES, 5 M NaCl, 10% Triton X-100, 10% sodium deoxycholate, 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), and 100 mM DTT) containing the protease inhibitor cocktail.

Western blot analysis

Western blot was performed essentially as described previously.[21,22] The mice were lightly anesthetized with isoflurane and then decapitated. The region of the ACC (400 μm thickness slice, three slices per mouse) was dissected and then homogenized in RIPA buffer (50 mM pH 7.6 Tris-Cl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM DTT, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail and protein phosphatase inhibitor cocktail after glycine treatment (30 min) and washout (60 min). After centrifugation, the supernatants were used for protein quantification by Bradford assay. Electrophoresis of equal amounts of total protein was performed on 4%–12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen). The separated proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane and stored at 4°C overnight. After blocking with 3% bovine serum albumin (for PKMζ and p-PKMζ) or 5% skim milk (for actin) in Tris-buffered saline plus Triton X-100 for 2 h at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with PKCζ (1:500, Invitrogen), phosphor-PKCζ (1:1000, Cell Signaling), GluA2 (1:1000, Abcam), or actin (1:5000, Sigma) primary antibody at 4°C overnight. After washing, the membranes were treated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature, followed by enhanced chemiluminescence detection of the proteins according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The density of immunoblots was measured and analyzed using ChemiDoc™ MP System (Bio-Rad).

Quantitative real-time PCR

Quantitative real-time PCR was performed essentially as described previously.[23] To measure mRNA expression level in the ACC after nerve injury, the region of the ACC (400 μm thickness slice, three slices per mouse) was dissected. Total RNA was purified with Trizol (Invitrogen) or RNAiso plus (Takara) reagent according to the user’s manual. After DNase I treatment for 15 min at room temperature, purified RNA was used for cDNA synthesis prepared by the SuperScript ® III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Cat. #18080–051, Invitrogen). After phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, cDNA was used for quantitative real-time PCR. To compare PKMζ mRNA levels between the sham and nerve injury groups, quantitative real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Cat. #RR820A, Takara) in a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System according to the user’s manual. The primers for PKMζ are 5′-ACGCCCACCTTCGGTAGAGC-3′ for forward and 5′-GGACGTGGCAGCGTTTATGG-3′ for reverse. The primers for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are 5′-AGTGTAATCCCATGGGTTACACCA-3′ for forward and 5′-CAGGAAGTGTCT ATCCTTATGAATCG-3′ for reverse. The primers for glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) are 5′-TGCACCACCAACTGCTTA-3′ for forward and 5′-GGATGCAGGGATGATGTTC-3′ for reverse. The expression level of PKMζ or BDNF was normalized to the expression level of GAPDH as a reference gene.

LTP recording using MED64

Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and killed by decapitation. The brain was removed and then quickly placed in ice-cold, oxygenated (95% O2, 5% CO2) cutting solution containing (in mM) 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 10 MgSO4, 15 Glucose, and 2 CaCl2. Coronal slices (300 μm) of the ACC were prepared using a vibratome (Leica VT 1000S). Those slices were allowed to recover in oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) at 26°C for at least 2 h before recordings were performed. aCSF contained the following (in mM): 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 1 MgSO4, 15 Glucose, and 2 CaCl2. Multielectrode array system (Panasonic, MED64) was used to record extracellular field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP) slopes in the ACC as reported previously.[24] Briefly, the MED64 probe was perfused with oxygenated aCSF at a rate of 2–3 ml/min and maintained at 28–30°C. One planar microelectrode with monopolar constant-current pulses (5–18 μA, 0.2ms) was used for stimulation of the ACC slice. Electrical stimulation was delivered to a microelectrode of the MED64 probe which is located within the deep layer V region of ACC. Evoked fEPSP slope was recorded in the other 63 microelectrodes. The stimulation intensity was determined to obtain stable responses from 4 to 6 microelectrodes near the stimulation site. One coronal slice was transferred to MED64 probe and allowed to recover for 30 min before recordings were initiated. Electrical stimulation was delivered at a frequency of 0.02 Hz. Following 30 min of stable baseline recording, glycine (1 mM) was applied for 30 min and washed out for another 1 h. For every slice, 4–6 channels near stimulation sites were chosen to be analyzed because of their stable response. The averaged value of those channels was counted as one sample and the data were averaged every 5 min. Glycine was purchased from Tocris Bioscience and prepared as a frozen stock solution (stored below −20°C) and dissolved into aCSF at least 30 min before their bath application.

Data analysis

Statistical comparisons were made using unpaired or paired t-tests or one-way ANOVAs. All data were presented as the mean ± SEM. In all cases, p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

It has been reported that LTP stimulation enhances PKMζ and p-PKMζ levels in hippocampal slices.[25] Thus, we tested whether LTP stimulation also activates PKMζ in the ACC. To induce chemical LTP, ACC slices were treated with 1 mM glycine for 30 min and incubated for 1 h after being rinsed. Consistent with previous findings,[26] this protocol induced LTP for 1 h after the glycine washout (Figure 1(a)). The p-PKMζ expression was enhanced by chemical LTP stimulation, although PKMζ level showed a tendency to increase (Figure 1(b)). However, the PKMζ mRNA level was significantly reduced after glycine treatment (Figure 1(c)). Next, we tested whether LTD also affects PKMζ activation in the ACC. However, mGluR-dependent LTD stimulation induced by several doses of dihydroxyphenylglycine bath-application for 30 min did not affect the level of PKMζ and p-PKMζ in the ACC (Figure 1(d)). Given that peripheral nerve injury such as amputation can induce an LTP-like state in the ACC, these results imply that nerve injury induces LTP and it may, then, enhance and activate PKMζ in the ACC in a transcription-independent manner.
Figure 1.

Enhancement of PKMζ induced by chemical LTP and transcription-independent increases of PKMζ induced by peripheral nerve injury. (a) Bath application of 1 mM glycine for 30 min induced LTP after washout (n = 6 slices/5 mice). (b) Western blot for PKMζ and p-PKMζ using slices treated with 1 mM glycine. To induce chemical LTP, the slices were treated with 1 mM glycine for 30 min and then washed out. One hour after washout, the ACC regions were used for western blot experiments (PKMζ; control: 100.0 ± 2.6%, glycine: 133.6 ± 16.9%, n = 6–8, p = 0.09, p-PKMζ; control: 100.0 ± 6.9, glycine: 147.3 ± 17.9%, n = 5–6, unpaired t-test; *p < 0.05). (c) Glycine treatment significantly reduced PKMζ mRNA levels (CTL: 1.000 ± 0.08167%, Gly: 0.8115 ± 0.04356%, n = 6, unpaired t-test; **p < 0.01). (d) Western blot for PKMζ and p-PKMζ using slices treated with DHPG. To induce chemical LTD, the slices were treated with 10, 50, or 100 µM DHPG for 30 min and then washed out. One hour after washout, the ACC regions were used for Western blot experiments (n = 4 per group, one-way ANOVA; p > 0.05). (e) The mRNA level of PKMζ in the ACC at three days after nerve injury. GAPDH was used as the internal control (upper panel). The PKMζ mRNA level was not different between the control and nerve injury groups (lower panel; n = 10–11 per group, unpaired t-test; p > 0.05). (f) Peripheral nerve injury increased the PKMζ protein level in the ACC. However, ActD treatment in the ACC did not reverse the nerve injury-induced increase in PKMζ protein levels (Sham + veh: 100 ± 9.403%, NI + veh: 157.3 ± 10.50%, NI + ActD: 143.3 ± 10.33%, n = 8–9 mice per group, p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test. *p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01). (g) ActD pretreatment in the ACC blocked the increase in BDNF mRNA level 90 min after formalin injection. GAPDH was used as the internal control. Formalin (5%, 10 µl) was injected into the left paw 30 min after ActD microinjection in the ACC. The ACC was then dissected 90 min after formalin injection. The BDNF mRNA level differed between the groups (n = 3 per group, one-sample t-test; *p < 0.05). CTL: control; PKMζ: protein kinase M ζ; Gly: glycine; DHPG: dihydroxyphenylglycine; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; veh: vehicle; ActD: actinomycin D; NI: nerve injury.

Enhancement of PKMζ induced by chemical LTP and transcription-independent increases of PKMζ induced by peripheral nerve injury. (a) Bath application of 1 mM glycine for 30 min induced LTP after washout (n = 6 slices/5 mice). (b) Western blot for PKMζ and p-PKMζ using slices treated with 1 mM glycine. To induce chemical LTP, the slices were treated with 1 mM glycine for 30 min and then washed out. One hour after washout, the ACC regions were used for western blot experiments (PKMζ; control: 100.0 ± 2.6%, glycine: 133.6 ± 16.9%, n = 6–8, p = 0.09, p-PKMζ; control: 100.0 ± 6.9, glycine: 147.3 ± 17.9%, n = 5–6, unpaired t-test; *p < 0.05). (c) Glycine treatment significantly reduced PKMζ mRNA levels (CTL: 1.000 ± 0.08167%, Gly: 0.8115 ± 0.04356%, n = 6, unpaired t-test; **p < 0.01). (d) Western blot for PKMζ and p-PKMζ using slices treated with DHPG. To induce chemical LTD, the slices were treated with 10, 50, or 100 µM DHPG for 30 min and then washed out. One hour after washout, the ACC regions were used for Western blot experiments (n = 4 per group, one-way ANOVA; p > 0.05). (e) The mRNA level of PKMζ in the ACC at three days after nerve injury. GAPDH was used as the internal control (upper panel). The PKMζ mRNA level was not different between the control and nerve injury groups (lower panel; n = 10–11 per group, unpaired t-test; p > 0.05). (f) Peripheral nerve injury increased the PKMζ protein level in the ACC. However, ActD treatment in the ACC did not reverse the nerve injury-induced increase in PKMζ protein levels (Sham + veh: 100 ± 9.403%, NI + veh: 157.3 ± 10.50%, NI + ActD: 143.3 ± 10.33%, n = 8–9 mice per group, p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons post hoc test. *p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01). (g) ActD pretreatment in the ACC blocked the increase in BDNF mRNA level 90 min after formalin injection. GAPDH was used as the internal control. Formalin (5%, 10 µl) was injected into the left paw 30 min after ActD microinjection in the ACC. The ACC was then dissected 90 min after formalin injection. The BDNF mRNA level differed between the groups (n = 3 per group, one-sample t-test; *p < 0.05). CTL: control; PKMζ: protein kinase M ζ; Gly: glycine; DHPG: dihydroxyphenylglycine; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; veh: vehicle; ActD: actinomycin D; NI: nerve injury. We previously showed that cAMP signaling increased PKMζ expression within a short period of time.[16] This result indicates a transcription-independent expression of PKMζ, because transcription of PKMζ pre-mRNA is likely to take more than 30 min.[25,27] To clarify this point, we tested the change of PKMζ mRNA in the ACC three days after nerve injury. As expected, the PKMζ mRNA level did not change significantly in the nerve injury group (Figure 1(e), upper panel). Quantitative real-time PCR also showed no increase in PKMζ mRNA level in the ACC after nerve injury (Figure 1(e), lower panel). Moreover, treatment with the transcription inhibitor ActD did not block the increase in PKMζ protein level in the ACC four days after nerve injury (Figure 1(f)). The absence of an effect of ActD on PKMζ protein level was not due to the use of a low dose of ActD (10 ng/side, bilateral infusion), as this dose is sufficient to block the increase in BDNF mRNA level in the ACC of mice injected with formalin to induce acute inflammatory pain (Figure 1(g)).[28] These results further support the idea that the increase in PKMζ level in the ACC induced by nerve injury was independent of transcription. Inhibition of PKMζ using ZIP reduces allodynia responses shown in neuropathic pain.[16] In the case of neuropathic pain, noxious signals from the peripheries are continuously delivered to various brain areas including the ACC region. Thus, it is useful to determine how long the alleviating effects of a single ZIP treatment for hyperalgesia last. Based on our previous result,[16] we measured the mechanical allodynia response at 4 or 6 h after ZIP infusion into the ACC. As shown in Figure 2(a) and (b), there was still a noticeable analgesic effect after an interval of 4 h, but not at 6 h. As neuropathic pain is a type of chronic pain, it is necessary to evaluate the effect of ZIP on chronically maintained neuropathic pain in view of clinical trial. In a previous study, the effects of ZIP were tested in a neuropathic pain model that was 3 or 7 days old.[16] Therefore, we tested the effects of ZIP on mice with nerve injuries induced one month before and found that ZIP still reduced the allodynia response in nerve-injured mice after one month (Figure 2(c) and (d)).
Figure 2.

The duration of the effect of ZIP on neuropathic pain. (a) The experimental scheme for measuring the duration of ZIP effect. (b) Location of the cannula tip (upper panel). Allodynia response at 4 or 6 h after ZIP infusion into the ACC (lower panel). Mice with nerve injuries induced three days before the allodynia test were used in this experiment. On the test day, ZIP was infused into the ACC immediately after the allodynia response (pre) had been measured. Then, the allodynia response was measured again at 4 or 6 h after ZIP infusion (n = 4–5, paired t-test; *p < 0.05). (c) The experimental scheme for testing the analgesic effect of ZIP in mice with nerve injuries induced one month before. (d) Location of the cannula tip (upper panel). Allodynia response at 2 h after ZIP infusion into the ACC (lower panel). Mice with nerve injury induced one month before the allodynia test were used in this experiment. On the test day, ZIP was infused into the ACC immediately after the allodynia response (pre) had been measured. Then, the allodynia response was measured again at 2 h after infusion (n = 3–5 per group, unpaired t-test between saline and ZIP infusion group, paired t-test between “pre” and “2 h post infusion” in the ZIP infusion group; *p < 0.05). ZIP: zeta inhibitory peptide.

The duration of the effect of ZIP on neuropathic pain. (a) The experimental scheme for measuring the duration of ZIP effect. (b) Location of the cannula tip (upper panel). Allodynia response at 4 or 6 h after ZIP infusion into the ACC (lower panel). Mice with nerve injuries induced three days before the allodynia test were used in this experiment. On the test day, ZIP was infused into the ACC immediately after the allodynia response (pre) had been measured. Then, the allodynia response was measured again at 4 or 6 h after ZIP infusion (n = 4–5, paired t-test; *p < 0.05). (c) The experimental scheme for testing the analgesic effect of ZIP in mice with nerve injuries induced one month before. (d) Location of the cannula tip (upper panel). Allodynia response at 2 h after ZIP infusion into the ACC (lower panel). Mice with nerve injury induced one month before the allodynia test were used in this experiment. On the test day, ZIP was infused into the ACC immediately after the allodynia response (pre) had been measured. Then, the allodynia response was measured again at 2 h after infusion (n = 3–5 per group, unpaired t-test between saline and ZIP infusion group, paired t-test between “pre” and “2 h post infusion” in the ZIP infusion group; *p < 0.05). ZIP: zeta inhibitory peptide. Our results shed some light on the synaptic mechanisms likely to be responsible for the analgesic effects produced by ZIP in neuropathic pain. PKMζ can postsynaptically potentiate the amplitude of AMPA receptor-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents.[29] Given that glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the ACC is increased after nerve injury,[30] PKMζ may contribute to the maintenance of the enhanced synaptic transmission induced by nerve injury. Previously, we showed that ZIP infusion in the ACC reduced postsynaptic GluA1, one component of AMPARs, selectively in the nerve injury group.[16] This result is surprising because previous studies have identified GluA2 as a target of PKMζ.[9,10] Thus, we tested if GluA2 is also reduced by ZIP treatment in the ACC. However, there was no difference in GluA2 between the saline and ZIP-infused groups in nerve-injured mice (Figure 3). This result indicates that PKMζ exerts its effect through the GluA1 AMPAR subunit at synapses in the ACC.
Figure 3.

Inhibition of PKMζ in the ACC does not reduce postsynaptic GluA2 levels. (a) Representative image of Western blot. (b) The postsynaptic GluA2 level was not decreased at 2 h after ZIP infusion into the ACC. Mice with nerve injury induced three days earlier were used for this experiment (n = 4 per group, one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05). NI: nerve injury; veh: vehicle. ZIP: zeta inhibitory peptide; NI: nerve injury.

Inhibition of PKMζ in the ACC does not reduce postsynaptic GluA2 levels. (a) Representative image of Western blot. (b) The postsynaptic GluA2 level was not decreased at 2 h after ZIP infusion into the ACC. Mice with nerve injury induced three days earlier were used for this experiment (n = 4 per group, one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05). NI: nerve injury; veh: vehicle. ZIP: zeta inhibitory peptide; NI: nerve injury.

Discussion

Here, we revealed that LTP, not LTD, stimulation activates PKMζ in the ACC. These enhancements in PKMζ and p-PKMζ are independent of transcription. The level of PKMζ mRNA in the ACC did not show enhancement after peripheral nerve injury. In addition, we confirmed that ZIP is still effective against mechanical allodynia maintained chronically in mice with neuropathic pain but only within a limited time. Although we did not observe the increase in PKMζ mRNA in the ACC three days after nerve injury, it does not mean that the expression of PKMζ is completely independent of transcription. It is plausible that PKMζ mRNA increases during a short time period after the initial peripheral nerve injury. Ongoing local cortical activity after nerve injury can activate adaptive mechanisms in the neurons of the ACC. Thus, to reveal the exact mechanism of PKMζ enhancement induced by nerve injury, it is necessary to measure the PKMζ mRNA level a relatively short time after nerve injury. Most patients suffering from neuropathic pain have been afflicted for long time, rather than a short period. If ZIP is to be used as a medicine, it should show therapeutic effect in chronically maintained neuropathic pain. ZIP infusion into the ACC still reduces the mechanical allodynia response shown in neuropathic pain a month old (Figure 2(b)). Given that ZIP application into the ACC does not show any side effects such as memory deficits,[16] this finding raises the possibility that ZIP could be used as a medication for chronic pain. However, the therapeutic effect of ZIP did not last for more than 4 h (Figure 2(a)). Therefore, it is necessary to apply ZIP continuously via a drug delivery system or alternatively to develop long-lasting inhibitor against PKMζ. Given that PKMζ regulates GluA2 subunit trafficking in the synapse, it is quite interesting that the inhibition of PKMζ did not reduce GluA2 in the PSD fraction of nerve-injured mice. This discrepancy might stem from brain region- or modality-specific functions of PKMζ. To date, GluA2 has been found to be a target of PKMζ in the hippocampus. However, we found that GluA1 is a target of PKMζ in the ACC. It is possible that PKMζ acts through different targets depending on brain regions. Another possibility is that PKMζ works with different targets depending on neurophysiological functions. Although we tested a target of PKMζ in the ACC of nerve-injured mice, if we examined a target of PKMζ in the ACC of fear-conditioned mice, GluA2 might be a target of PKMζ. Regardless of which hypothesis is true, at least it is certain that PKMζ has a direct downstream target other than N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion (NSF) protein to regulate the trafficking of GluA1 because NSF does not directly bind to GluA1.[31] Our previous finding that the GluA1, and not the GluA2, subunit is required for LTP in the ACC supports our present results because LTP in the ACC underlies chronic pain.[32] Thus, it is valuable to investigate which target molecule of PKMζ in the ACC mediates GluA1 trafficking in the synapse to sustain chronic pain. These future studies will contribute to the development of new medicines for chronic pain.
  32 in total

1.  Protein kinase Mzeta is necessary and sufficient for LTP maintenance.

Authors:  Douglas S F Ling; Larry S Benardo; Peter A Serrano; Nancy Blace; Matthew T Kelly; John F Crary; Todd C Sacktor
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  PKMzeta maintains memories by regulating GluR2-dependent AMPA receptor trafficking.

Authors:  Paola Virginia Migues; Oliver Hardt; Dong Chuan Wu; Karine Gamache; Todd Charlton Sacktor; Yu Tian Wang; Karim Nader
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Alleviating neuropathic pain hypersensitivity by inhibiting PKMzeta in the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Xiang-Yao Li; Hyoung-Gon Ko; Tao Chen; Giannina Descalzi; Kohei Koga; Hansen Wang; Susan S Kim; Yuze Shang; Chuljung Kwak; Soo-Won Park; Jaehoon Shim; Kyungmin Lee; Graham L Collingridge; Bong-Kiun Kaang; Min Zhuo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Plasticity of metabotropic glutamate receptor-dependent long-term depression in the anterior cingulate cortex after amputation.

Authors:  SukJae Joshua Kang; Ming-Gang Liu; Tao Chen; Hyoung-Gon Ko; Gi-Chul Baek; Hye-Ryeon Lee; Kyungmin Lee; Graham L Collingridge; Bong-Kiun Kaang; Min Zhuo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  PKM zeta maintains late long-term potentiation by N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor/GluR2-dependent trafficking of postsynaptic AMPA receptors.

Authors:  Yudong Yao; Matthew Taylor Kelly; Sreedharan Sajikumar; Peter Serrano; Dezhi Tian; Peter John Bergold; Julietta Uta Frey; Todd Charlton Sacktor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Presynaptic and postsynaptic amplifications of neuropathic pain in the anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Hui Xu; Long-Jun Wu; Hansen Wang; Xuehan Zhang; Kunjumon I Vadakkan; Susan S Kim; Hendrik W Steenland; Min Zhuo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Restoring synaptic plasticity and memory in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease by PKR inhibition.

Authors:  Kyoung-Doo Hwang; Myeong Seong Bak; Sang Jeong Kim; Sangmyung Rhee; Yong-Seok Lee
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.041

8.  Dynorphinergic system alterations in the corticostriatal circuitry of neuropathic mice support its role in the negative affective component of pain.

Authors:  M Palmisano; F F Caputi; D Mercatelli; P Romualdi; S Candeletti
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.449

9.  NSF binding to GluR2 regulates synaptic transmission.

Authors:  A Nishimune; J T Isaac; E Molnar; J Noel; S R Nash; M Tagaya; G L Collingridge; S Nakanishi; J M Henley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Inhibition of anterior cingulate cortex excitatory neuronal activity induces conditioned place preference in a mouse model of chronic inflammatory pain.

Authors:  Sukjae Joshua Kang; Siyong Kim; Jaehyun Lee; Chuljung Kwak; Kyungmin Lee; Min Zhuo; Bong-Kiun Kaang
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.016

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal Adenylyl Cyclase Targeting Central Plasticity for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Xu-Hui Li; Qi-Yu Chen; Min Zhuo
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Role of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Translational Pain Research.

Authors:  Xiao Xiao; Ming Ding; Yu-Qiu Zhang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  Abolished ketamine effects on the spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic current of medial prefrontal cortex neurons in GluN2D knockout mice.

Authors:  Dae Hee Han; Ilgang Hong; Ja Eun Choi; Pojeong Park; Jun-Yeong Baek; HyoJin Park; Soichiro Ide; Masayoshi Mishina; Kazutaka Ikeda; Bong-Kiun Kaang
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 4.041

Review 4.  The Medial Prefrontal Cortex as a Central Hub for Mental Comorbidities Associated with Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Kai K Kummer; Miodrag Mitrić; Theodora Kalpachidou; Michaela Kress
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 6.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.