| Literature DB >> 29923425 |
Hany E A Ahmed1,2, Mohammed A A El-Nassag3,4, Ahmed H Hassan3,4, Rawda M Okasha5, Saleh Ihmaid1, Ahmed M Fouda6, Tarek H Afifi5, Ateyatallah Aljuhani5, Ahmed M El-Agrody3.
Abstract
In our effort to develop novel and powerful agents with anti-proliferative activity, two new series of 1H-benzo[f]chromene derivatives, 4a-h and 6a-h, were synthesised using heterocyclocondensation methodologies under microwave irradiation condition. The structures of the target compounds were established on the basis of their spectral data, IR,Entities:
Keywords: 1H-benzo[f]chromenes; Caspase 3/7; Microwave synthesis; SAR study; antitumour activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29923425 PMCID: PMC6022228 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1476503
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.Reference drugs bearing chromene (red highlighted) or 1H-benzo[f]chromene (blue highlighted) with different biological activities.
Cytotoxic activity of the target compounds against MCF-7, HCT-116, and HepG-2 cell lines.
| Compound | Ar | IC50 (µg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCF-7 | HCT-116 | HepG-2 | HFL-1 | ||
| C6H5 | 0.9 ± 0.29 | 1.2 ± 0.97 | 0.7 ± 0.5 | ||
| 4-FC6H4 | 5.2 ± 0.03 | 1.0 ± 0.12 | 0.8 ± 0.12 | ||
| 4-ClC6H4 | 0.5 ± 0.23 | 0.7 ± 0.11 | 1.1 ± 0.12 | 15.2 ± 0.10 | |
| 4-BrC6H4 | 2.5 ± 0.14 | 0.5 ± 0.35 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | ||
| 4-MeC6H4 | 2.5 ± 0.18 | 0.7 ± 0.25 | 0.9 ± 0.14 | 22.4 ± 0.21 | |
| 4-MeOC6H4 | 3.8 ± 0.36 | 44.9 ± 0.14 | 4.4 ± 0.05 | ||
| 2,4-MeOC6H3 | 3.6 ± 0.01 | 3.7 ± 0.15 | 2.8 ± 0.17 | ||
| 3,4-MeOC6H3 | 0.66 ± 0.04 | 4.1 ± 0.16 | 11.0 ± 0.02 | 12.9 ± 0.13 | |
| C6H5 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.23 | 11.2 ± 0.18 | ||
| 4-FC6H4 | 4.4 ± 0.05 | 4.9 ± 0.01 | 0.5 ± 0.01 | ||
| 4-ClC6H4 | 3.1 ± 0.29 | 2.5 ± 0.97 | 0.3 ± 0.08 | ||
| 4-BrC6H4 | 2.0 ± 0.25 | 0.9 ± 0.58 | 0.7 ± 0.13 | 35.5 ± 0.22 | |
| 4-MeC6H4 | 0.3 ± 0.05 | 0.8 ± 0.06 | 0.6 ± 0.21 | 29.7 ± 0.17 | |
| 4-MeOC6H4 | 0.6 ± 0.08 | 3.8 ± 0.14 | 29.3 ± 0.12 | ||
| 2,4-MeOC6H3 | 16.0 ± 0.92 | 10.9 ± 0.5 | 9.0 ± 0.3 | ||
| 3,4-MeOC6H3 | 41.1 ± 0.25 | 13.9 ± 0.3 | 30.7 ± 0.5 | ||
| – | 6.1 ± 0.03 | 2.6 ± 0.08 | 4.6 ± 0.01 | ||
| – | 0.4 ± 0.01 | 0.5 ± 0.015 | 0.9 ± 0.04 | ||
IC50 values expressed in µg/mL as the mean values of triplicate wells from at least three experiments and are reported as the mean ± standard error.
Figure 2.Heatmap of the distribution of IC50 values with colour codes of target compounds against the panel of three cancer cell lines.
Scheme 2.Synthesis of 3-amino-1-aryl-8-methoxy-1H-benzo[f]chromene-3-carbonitriles (6a–h).
Figure 3.The effect of selected benzochromene derivatives on the invasion of MDA-MB-231 cell line.
IC50 values for two most potent ant-invasion compounds in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.
| Compound ID | IC50 (M) |
|---|---|
| 1.08 × 10−5 | |
| 1.65 × 10−5 |
Figure 4.Apoptosis induction by caspase-3/7 activity assay detection in MDA-MB-231 cell line after compound treatment against reference drug.
Caspase-Glo 3/7 activity assay.
| Compound ID | MDA-MB-231 cell line, IC50 (M) |
|---|---|
| 2.26 × 10−5 | |
| 1.95 × 10−5 | |
| 3.15 × 10−5 | |
| 2.56 × 10−5 | |
| 3.89 × 10−5 | |
| 6.85 × 10−8 |
Inhibition of c-Src kinase activity data as IC50 values (nM) of selected 1H-benzo[f]-chromene derivatives.
| Compound ID | IC50 (nM) |
|---|---|
| 89 | |
| 9 | |
| 214 | |
| 329 | |
| 9 | |
| Staurosporine | 112 |
Positive and negative controls and effectiveness of the test compounds against MCF-7.
| Control/Cpd. | IC50 (μg/mL) | Cell line | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.1 ± 0.03 | MCF-7 | 221.234 | 0.000 (HS) | |
| 0.5 ± 0.23 | ||||
| 0.66 ± 0.04 | ||||
| 0.9 ± 0.29 | ||||
| 2.5 ± 0.14 | ||||
| 2.5 ± 0.18 | ||||
| 3.6 ± 0.01 | ||||
| 3.8 ± 0.36 | ||||
| 5.2 ± 0.03 | ||||
| 0.3 ± 0.05 | ||||
| 0.6 ± 0.08 | ||||
| 2.0 ± 0.25 | ||||
| 2.7 ± 0.2 | ||||
| 3.1 ± 0.29 | ||||
| 4.4 ± 0.05 |
Positive control (active compounds) and negative control (standard drugs).
All statistical calculations were done as the mean values of triplicate.
HS: Highest significantly at p values <0.05.
Positive and negative controls and effectiveness of the test compounds against HCT-116.
| Control/Cpd. | IC50 (μg/mL) | Cell line | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.6 ± 0.08 | HCT-116 | 57.243 | 0.000 (HS) | |
| 0.5 ± 0.35 | ||||
| 0.7 ± 0.11 | ||||
| 0.7 ± 0.25 | ||||
| 1.0 ± 0.12 | ||||
| 1.2 ± 0.97 | ||||
| 0.8 ± 0.06 | ||||
| 0.9 ± 0.58 | ||||
| 2.1 ± 0.23 | ||||
| 2.5 ± 0.97 |
Positive control (active compounds) and negative control (standard drugs).
All statistical calculations were done as the mean values of triplicate.
HS: Highest significantly at p value <0.05.
Positive and negative controls and effectiveness of the test compounds against HepG-2.
| Control/Cpd. | IC50 (μg/mL) | Cell line | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.6 ± 0.18 | HepG-2 | 270.518 | 0.000 (HS) | |
| 0.7 ± 0.06 | ||||
| 0.8 ± 0.06 | ||||
| 0.9 ± 0.06 | ||||
| 1.1 ± 0.08 | ||||
| 1.8 ± 0.12 | ||||
| 2.8 ± 0.11 | ||||
| 4.4 ± 0.09 | ||||
| 0.3 ± 0.02 | ||||
| 0.5 ± 0.03 | ||||
| 0.6 ± 0.01 | ||||
| 0.7 ± 0.04 | ||||
| 0.9 ± 0.05 | HepG-2 | 8.210 | 0.000 (HS) | |
| 0.7 ± 0.08 | ||||
| 0.8 ± 0.03 | ||||
| 0.9 ± 0.06 | ||||
| 0.3 ± 0.08 | ||||
| 0.5 ± 0.06 | ||||
| 0.6 ± 0.04 | ||||
| 0.7 ± 0.02 |
Positive control (active compounds) and negative control (standard drugs).
All statistical calculations were done as the mean values of triplicate.
HS: Highest significantly at p value <0.05.
Positive and negative controls and effectiveness of the test compound against MCF-7.
| Control/Cpd. | IC50 (μg/mL) | Cell line | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.4 ± 0.01 | MCF-7 | 1.225 | 0.288 (NS) | |
| 0.3 ± 0.05 |
Positive control (active compounds) and negative control (standard drugs).
All statistical calculations were done as the mean values of triplicate.
NS: not significant at p values >0.05.
Figure 5.Binding data of target compounds. (A) 3D and 2D depiction of the docked conformation of the selected active compounds (A) 4c, (B) 4h, and (C) 6e in the active site of enzyme revealing the essential residues and types of interactions.
Description of the docking data of selected target compounds.
| Cop. | Fragment | Target residues (distance, Å) | Interaction | Binding energy (dG) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN | Met341 (2.64), H2O-Ser342 (2.65) | H-bonding | ||
| NH2 | Glu339 (1.80) | H-bonding | ||
| Cl | Leu273 | Hydrophobic | ||
| Br-Naphthalene | Val281, Asp404, Leu273, Lys295 | Hydrophobic | ||
| CN | Met341 (3.15) | H-bonding | ||
| NH2 | Glu339 (1.84) | H-bonding | ||
| MeO | Lys295, H2O-Asp346, H2O-Ser345, H2O-Ala390 (3.64) (3.53) (2.29) | H-bonding | ||
| Br-Naphthalene | Asp404, Lys295 | Hydrophobic | ||
| CN | Met341 (2.92) | H-bonding | ||
| NH2 | H2O-Ser342 (2.55) | H-bonding | ||
| MeO | Lys295, H2O-Asn391, Asp404 (2.51) (2.57) | H-bonding | ||
| Me | Asn391, Asp404 | Hydrophobic | ||
| MeO-Naphthalene | Val281, Leu273 | Hydrophobic |
The data reported in the table are extracted from MOE program showing the corresponding amino acids residues in enzyme pocket, corresponding fragments of ligands, interaction distances, types of interaction, and their binding energy to some selected drugs. Conserved amino acids are bold highlighted.
Predicted ADME, Lipinski parameters, and molecular properties of the synthesised compounds.
| Cpd. | M. wt. | Log | TPSA | Log | %ABS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 377 | −7.3 | 1 | 1 | 59 | 4.8 | 88.6 | |
| 395 | −7.6 | 1 | 1 | 59 | 4.9 | 88.6 | |
| 412 | −8 | 1 | 1 | 59 | 5.4 | 88.6 | |
| 456 | −8.3 | 1 | 1 | 59 | 5.6 | 88.6 | |
| 407 | −7.3 | 2 | 1 | 68 | 4.7 | 85.4 | |
| 391 | −7.7 | 1 | 1 | 59 | 5.1 | 88.6 | |
| 437 | −7.4 | 3 | 1 | 78 | 4.7 | 82.3 | |
| 437 | −7.4 | 3 | 1 | 78 | 4.5 | 82.3 | |
| 328 | −6.2 | 2 | 1 | 68 | 3.9 | 85.4 | |
| 346 | −6.5 | 2 | 1 | 68 | 4.1 | 85.4 | |
| 363 | −6.9 | 2 | 1 | 68 | 4.5 | 85.4 | |
| 407 | −7.3 | 2 | 1 | 68 | 4.7 | 85.4 | |
| 342 | −6.7 | 2 | 1 | 68 | 4.2 | 85.4 | |
| 358 | −6.3 | 3 | 1 | 78 | 3.9 | 82.3 | |
| 388 | −6.3 | 4 | 1 | 87 | 3.9 | 79.1 | |
| 388 | −6.3 | 4 | 1 | 87 | 3.6 | 79.1 |
% ABS: Percentage of absorption; TPSA: topological polar surface area; n-ON: number of hydrogen bond acceptors; n-OHNH: number of hydrogen bond donors; logS: solubility coefficient; Log P: partition coefficient. Calculations were performed using Molinspiration online property calculation toolkit (http://www.molinspiration.com).