Ji Soo Song1,2,3, Eun Jung Choi4,5,6, Seung Bae Hwang4,5,6, Hong Pil Hwang7, HyeMi Choi8. 1. Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54907, South Korea. pichgo@gmail.com. 2. Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea. pichgo@gmail.com. 3. Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea. pichgo@gmail.com. 4. Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54907, South Korea. 5. Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea. 6. Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea. 7. Department of Surgery, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, South Korea. 8. Department of Statistics, Research Institute of Applied Statistics, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To use Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categorization and features of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) to intraindividually compare gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-DTPA-MRI) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI), before and after applying modified major features. METHODS: Of 77 HCCs in 64 patients analysed, 17 HCCs were confirmed histopathologically and 46 patients had cirrhosis. Gd-EOB-MRI and Gd-DTPA-MRI were evaluated for the presence of major and ancillary features by two radiologists. LI-RADS categorization was done for Gd-DTPA-MRI (LI-RADS-DTPA) and for Gd-EOB-MRI before and after applying modified major features (hepatobiliary phase [HBP] hypointensity as an additional major feature, LI-RADS-EOBm1; HBP hypointense rim as capsule appearance, LI-RADS-EOBm2; and transitional phase [TP] hypointensity as washout appearance, LI-RADS-EOBm3). Sensitivities of LR-5 categorization for the diagnosis of HCC were compared. RESULTS: Washout (p=0.012) and capsule appearance (p<0.001) were less frequently observed on Gd-EOB-MRI. Sensitivity for LR-5 categorization was significantly higher with LI-RADS-DTPA compared with LI-RADS-EOB (p=0.001) and LI-RADS-EOBm2 (p=0.004), while sensitivity for LR-5 categorization with LI-RADS-EOBm1 (p=0.210) and LI-RADS-EOBm3 (p=0.727) was comparable. CONCLUSION: Modifying LI-RADS for use with Gd-EOB-MRI, such as applying HBP hypointensity as an additional major feature or using TP hypointensity as washout appearance, can improve the sensitivity for the detection of HCC. KEY POINTS: • Adding HBP hypointensity as additional major feature improved sensitivity of LR-5 categorization. • Adding TP hypointensity as modified washout appearance improved sensitivity of LR-5 categorization. • Sensitivities for LR-5 classification were comparable between LI-RADS-DTPA, LI-RADS-EOBm1, and LI-RADS-EOBm3.
OBJECTIVES: To use Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categorization and features of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) to intraindividually compare gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-DTPA-MRI) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI), before and after applying modified major features. METHODS: Of 77 HCCs in 64 patients analysed, 17 HCCs were confirmed histopathologically and 46 patients had cirrhosis. Gd-EOB-MRI and Gd-DTPA-MRI were evaluated for the presence of major and ancillary features by two radiologists. LI-RADS categorization was done for Gd-DTPA-MRI (LI-RADS-DTPA) and for Gd-EOB-MRI before and after applying modified major features (hepatobiliary phase [HBP] hypointensity as an additional major feature, LI-RADS-EOBm1; HBP hypointense rim as capsule appearance, LI-RADS-EOBm2; and transitional phase [TP] hypointensity as washout appearance, LI-RADS-EOBm3). Sensitivities of LR-5 categorization for the diagnosis of HCC were compared. RESULTS: Washout (p=0.012) and capsule appearance (p<0.001) were less frequently observed on Gd-EOB-MRI. Sensitivity for LR-5 categorization was significantly higher with LI-RADS-DTPA compared with LI-RADS-EOB (p=0.001) and LI-RADS-EOBm2 (p=0.004), while sensitivity for LR-5 categorization with LI-RADS-EOBm1 (p=0.210) and LI-RADS-EOBm3 (p=0.727) was comparable. CONCLUSION: Modifying LI-RADS for use with Gd-EOB-MRI, such as applying HBP hypointensity as an additional major feature or using TP hypointensity as washout appearance, can improve the sensitivity for the detection of HCC. KEY POINTS: • Adding HBP hypointensity as additional major feature improved sensitivity of LR-5 categorization. • Adding TP hypointensity as modified washout appearance improved sensitivity of LR-5 categorization. • Sensitivities for LR-5 classification were comparable between LI-RADS-DTPA, LI-RADS-EOBm1, and LI-RADS-EOBm3.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnosis; Gadopentetate dimeglumine; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Thomas A Hope; Kathryn J Fowler; Claude B Sirlin; Eduardo A C Costa; Judy Yee; Benjamin M Yeh; Jay P Heiken Journal: Abdom Imaging Date: 2015-03
Authors: Sang Hyun Choi; Jae Ho Byun; So Yeon Kim; So Jung Lee; Hyung Jin Won; Yong Moon Shin; Pyo Nyun Kim Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: A Granito; M Galassi; F Piscaglia; L Romanini; V Lucidi; M Renzulli; A Borghi; L Grazioli; R Golfieri; L Bolondi Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-12-02 Impact factor: 8.171