Literature DB >> 26820629

Diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma ⩽3 cm with hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Sang Hyun Choi1, Jae Ho Byun2, Young-Suk Lim3, Eunsil Yu4, So Jung Lee1, So Yeon Kim1, Hyung Jin Won1, Yong Moon Shin1, Pyo Nyun Kim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Current diagnostic imaging criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are dedicated to imaging with nonspecific extracellular contrast agents. This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic criteria for HCC ⩽3 cm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a hepatocyte-specific contrast agent through an inception cohort study.
METHODS: Of 291 patients with chronic liver disease and new nodules of 1-3 cm in diameter at surveillance ultrasonography, 295 solid nodules (194 HCCs, 98 benign nodules, and three other malignancies) in 198 patients with a confirmed final diagnosis or ⩾24 months follow-up were evaluated on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, various diagnostic criteria were developed by combining significant MRI findings for diagnosing HCC. The diagnostic performance of each criterion was compared with that of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria.
RESULTS: Four MRI findings (arterial-phase hyperintensity, transitional-phase hypointensity, hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity, and rim enhancement) were independently significant for diagnosis of HCC ⩽3 cm. For whole nodules, EASL criteria showed the best performance for diagnosing HCC (sensitivity, 83.5%; specificity, 81.2%). For nodules ⩽2 cm in diameter, a new criterion (arterial-phase hyperintensity and hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity) showed a significantly higher sensitivity than that of the EASL criteria (83.0% vs. 74.5%, p=0.008), without a significantly different specificity (76.7% vs. 81.1%, p=0.125).
CONCLUSIONS: EASL criteria exhibit the best diagnostic performance for HCC ⩽3 cm on hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI. A newly identified criterion (arterial-phase hyperintensity and hepatobiliary-phase hypointensity) may increase the diagnostic sensitivity of small (⩽2 cm) HCC.
Copyright © 2016 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic criteria; Diagnostic imaging; Gadoxetic acid; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26820629     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  24 in total

1.  Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System on CT and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Dong Ik Cha; Kyung Mi Jang; Seong Hyun Kim; Tae Wook Kang; Kyoung Doo Song
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Pitfalls and problems to be solved in the diagnostic CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS).

Authors:  Yeun-Yoon Kim; Jin-Young Choi; Claude B Sirlin; Chansik An; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Capsule, septum, and T2 hyperintense foci for differentiation between large hepatocellular carcinoma (≥5 cm) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on gadoxetic acid MRI.

Authors:  Jiyoung Hwang; Young Kon Kim; Ji Hye Min; Seo-Youn Choi; Woo Kyung Jeong; Seong Sook Hong; Hyun-Joo Kim; Soohyun Ahn; Hyeon Seon Ahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI: 15-min delayed phase may improve the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Si Eun Lee; Chansik An; Shin Hye Hwang; Jin-Young Choi; Kyunghwa Han; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of prospective application of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in gadoxetate-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Yeun-Yoon Kim; Chansik An; Sungwon Kim; Myeong-Jin Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Multidisciplinary management of recurrent and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: an international expert consensus.

Authors:  Tianfu Wen; Chen Jin; Antonio Facciorusso; Matteo Donadon; Ho-Seong Han; Yilei Mao; Chaoliu Dai; Shuqun Cheng; Bixiang Zhang; Baogang Peng; Shunda Du; Changjun Jia; Feng Xu; Jie Shi; Juxian Sun; Peng Zhu; Satoshi Nara; J Michael Millis
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.293

7.  LI-RADS v2014 categorization of hepatocellular carcinoma: Intraindividual comparison between gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Ji Soo Song; Eun Jung Choi; Seung Bae Hwang; Hong Pil Hwang; HyeMi Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  2018 Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  A New Diagnostic Criterion with Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI May Improve the Diagnostic Performance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yi Wei; Zheng Ye; Yuan Yuan; Zixing Huang; Xiaocheng Wei; Tong Zhang; Shang Wan; Hehan Tang; Xiaopeng He; Bin Song
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 11.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.