Literature DB >> 29922243

A Novel mcr-1 Variant Carried by an IncI2-Type Plasmid Identified From a Multidrug Resistant Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

Hongbo Liu1,2, Binghua Zhu1,2, Beibei Liang1,2, Xuebin Xu3, Shaofu Qiu2, Leili Jia2, Peng Li2, Lang Yang1,2, Yongrui Li2, Ying Xiang1,2, Jing Xie2, Ligui Wang2, Chaojie Yang2, Yansong Sun1, Hongbin Song1,2.   

Abstract

In this study, we discovered a novel mobilized colistin resistance (mcr-1) gene variant, named mcr-1.9, which was identified in a colistin-resistant enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) strain from a clinical diarrhea case. The mcr-1.9 gene differs from mcr-1 at position 1036 due to a single nucleotide polymorphism (G→A), which results in an aspartic acid residue being replaced by an asparagine residue (Asp346→Asn) in the MCR-1 protein sequence. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that the mcr-1.9-harboring ETEC strain is resistant to colistin at a minimum inhibitory concentration of 4 μg/ml. Plasmid profiling and conjugation experiments also suggest that the mcr-1.9 variant can be successfully transferred into the E. coli strain J53, indicating that the gene is located on a transferable plasmid. Bioinformatics analysis of data obtained from genome sequencing indicates that the mcr-1.9 gene is located on a 64,005 bp plasmid which has been named pEC26. This plasmid was found to have high similarity to the mcr-1-bearing IncI2-type plasmids pWF-5-19C (99% identity and 99% coverage) and pmcr1-IncI2 (99% identity and 98% coverage). The mcr-1.9-harboring ETEC also shows multidrug resistance to nine classes of antibiotics, and contains several virulence and antimicrobial-resistance genes suggested by the genome sequence analysis. Our report is the first to identify a new mcr-1 variant in an ETEC isolated from a human fecal sample, raising concerns about the existence of more such variants in human intestinal flora. Therefore, we believe that an undertaking to identify new mcr-1 variants in the bacterial communities of human intestines is of utmost importance, and that measures need to be taken to control the spread of mcr-1 and its variants in human intestinal microflora.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical diarrhea; enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC); mobilized colistin resistance (mcr-1) gene; multidrug resistance (MDR); novel mcr-1 variant

Year:  2018        PMID: 29922243      PMCID: PMC5996929          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Diarrheal diseases are the second leading cause of death in children under 5 years of age (Qadri et al., 2005). Each year, diarrhea kills ∼525,000 children worldwide (World Health Organization [WHO], 2017). Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is an extremely important causative agent of diarrhea in the developing world, due to the prevalence of unhygienic conditions that include the unavailability of clean water and poor sanitation. It is the most frequently encountered bacterial agent causing diarrhea in both children and adults, as well as the most common cause of traveler’s diarrhea in these areas (von Sonnenburg et al., 2000; Bourgeois et al., 2016). ETECs are defined by their ability to produce one or both of two types of enterotoxins [heat-stable (ST) and heat-labile (LT) (So et al., 1978; Rao, 2008)], besides which, they may also produce several colonization factors (CFs) (So et al., 1978) and carry chromosomal determinants associated with ETEC virulence (Del Canto et al., 2011). Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has now been recognized as a significant global threat to human and animal health (World Health Organization [WHO], 2018). Due to the widespread and indiscriminate use of antibiotics in countries where diarrhea is endemic, the rate of multidrug resistance (MDR, resistance to three or more classes of antimicrobials) in Enterobacteriaceae such as ETEC, is increasing alarmingly (Lynch et al., 2013). So far, due to this increase in MDR, the usage of successively stronger antimicrobial agents belonging to the tetracycline, sulfonamide, macrolide, and fluoroquinolone families to treat ETEC infections has increased (Diemert, 2006; Rodas et al., 2011). Fluoroquinolones are one of the most recently developed, powerful, and broad-spectrum antibiotics used for treating a wide variety of bacterial infections (Oethinger et al., 1996). Unfortunately, since their introduction in the late 1980s, bacterial resistance to fluoroquinolones has increased markedly (Aguiar et al., 1992). Colistin, which is a polymyxin antibiotic, is currently used as a last-resort antibiotic for treating infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria exhibiting MDR. However, a study conducted by Liu et al. (2015) on E. coli strains from China, has described a new plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance mechanism conferred by the phosphoethanolamine transferase-encoding gene mcr-1 (Liu et al., 2015). Since then, numerous studies on mcr-1 have been undertaken worldwide to investigate the presence of this gene in E. coli strains isolated from various animals, environments, food samples, and even human subjects (Doumith et al., 2016; Khalifa et al., 2016; Perrin-Guyomard et al., 2016; Suzuki et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2017a). Since the discovery of mcr-1, several variants of the gene, such as mcr-1.2, mcr-2, mcr-1.3, mcr-1.4, mcr-1.5, mcr-1.6, mcr-1.7, and mcr-1.8 have been discovered in Italy, Belgium, China, and Brunei (Di Pilato et al., 2016; Xavier et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2017; Tijet et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2017b). The variants, mcr-2, mcr-1.3, mcr-1.4, mcr-1.5, mcr-1.7, and mcr-1.8 are known to have been identified from E. coli strains isolated from animal, sewage, or human urinary tract samples (the source for mcr-1.8 has not been indicated) (Table ). In this study, we report a new variant of the mcr-1 gene, which we term mcr-1.9, identified from an E. coli strain (an ETEC) isolated from a diarrheal fecal sample. Apart from analyzing the molecular and AMR characteristics of this ETEC strain, we have also identified the plasmid type in which mcr-1.9 is located, and compared it with other similar mcr-1-harboring plasmids described elsewhere. We believe that this is the first report that identifies a new mcr-1 variant from an ETEC strain isolated from a human fecal sample. List of currently known mcr-1 gene variants and mcr-2.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Isolation, Serotyping, and mcr-1 Gene Screening

A fecal sample was obtained from a 15-month-old male child diagnosed with watery diarrhea and fever, cured with ceftriaxone in 2014 at the Shanghai Children’s Hospital, China. The fecal sample was streaked onto MacConkey agar and incubated overnight at 37°C. Colonies having a pink coloration and a round, neat appearance were selected as suspected E. coli colonies. These were again streaked directly onto MacConkey agar, and incubated overnight at 37°C, following which, the colonies so obtained were further sub-cultured on Luria–Bertani (LB) agar plates at 37°C. Genomic DNA was prepared using the boiling method from the isolated bacteria, and a Diarrhoeagenic E. coli (DEC) detection PCR kit (SSI Diagnostica, Denmark) was used to identify the type of E. coli strain obtained from the fecal sample. The PCR reactions were performed in a 20-μl volume containing 10 μl of PCR ReadyMix, 6 μl of Primer mix, and 4 μl of DNA template. The cycling conditions were 95°C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 50 s, annealing at 62°C for 40 s, extension at 72°C for 50 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 3 min in an Applied Biosystems PCR cycler. The PCR products are then loaded into 2% agarose gel and electrophoresis. The type of DEC was then identified by the comparison on the fragment size of PCR products and marker in the kit. We screened for the presence of the mcr-1 gene in this isolate (termed SH66) without prior knowledge of its colistin-resistance. The screening was carried out with PCR and Sanger sequencing using previously described primers (Liu et al., 2016). Informed and written consents were obtained from the patient’s parents for sample collection and usage, as well as for the publication of obtained results in this study. All experiments were approved and authorized by the Ethics Committees of the Institute of Disease Prevention and Control, People’s Liberation Army, China.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of colistin for all isolates obtained from the fecal sample were determined using the 96-well plate dilution method, with a maximum colistin concentration of 32 μg/mL, and a minimum concentration of 0.5 μg/mL; the results were interpreted according to the conventions set by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)[1]. For the mcr-1-positive isolates, we also tested for antimicrobial susceptibility to other antimicrobials via the broth microdilution method using a 96-well microtiter plate (Sensititre, Trek Diagnostic Systems, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., West Sussex, United Kingdom). MICs were determined according to the clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI, 2014) recommendations (Bennett et al., 2014). The E. coli strain ATCC 25922 was used for quality control.

Plasmid Profiling and Southern Blotting

The DNA of ETEC strain for plasmid profiling was obtained and embedded into agarose according to the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) plug preparation method (Ribot et al., 2006). Then the plug was cut into slices and treated with S1 endonuclease, following which, the DNA fragments were subjected to PFGE according to the PulseNet standard protocols (Ribot et al., 2006). Following this, the membrane transfer, molecular hybridization, and probe detection steps were performed according to a previously reported method (Zou et al., 2015). The mcr-1 probe sequences used in the southern blotting analysis were identical to the mcr-1 primer sequences mentioned in Section “Bacterial Isolation, Serotyping, and mcr-1 Gene Screening.”

Conjugation Experiments

Conjugation experiments to test the transferability of the mcr-1-positive plasmid were carried out using the E. coli strain J53 (LacZ-, AzrR, RifR) as a recipient, and the mcr-1-positive E. coli strain (identified in the fecal sample and named SH66) as a donor. Overnight cultures of donor and recipient bacterial strains (3 mL of each) were mixed together, harvested, and resuspended in 80 μl of LB with a donor:recipient ratio of 1:3. The resultant mixture was spotted into 5 mL of liquid LB broth and incubated 37°C for 12 to 18 h for mating to occur. Following this, a small amount of the mating mixture was spotted on to a Muller-Hinton agar plate (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, United States) containing 100 mg/L sodium azide and 2 mg/L polymyxin B; this was used as a selective medium to identify E. coli J53 transconjugants. The identities of putative transconjugants were confirmed using antimicrobial susceptibility testing and PCR detection of the mcr-1.9 gene as described before. The conjugation transfer rate was calculated through the formula “R = number of transconjugants/number of recipients.”

Whole Genome Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis

The genomic DNA of the E. coli isolate SH66 was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany), and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A DNA library was constructed with inserts of length 600 bp using the MiSeq Reagent Kit v2. The raw sequence data were assembled de novo via the CLC Genomics Workbench 9.0.1 (CLC Bio, Qiagen Bioinformatics, Germany). The mcr-1 plasmid sequence was assembled through the above software and the gaps were filled through combinatorial PCR and Sanger sequencing. The point mutation in mcr-1.9 was verified by the PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing with the primers MCR1-3-F (5′-GGCGTATTCTGTGCCGTGTA-3′) and MCR1-3-R (5′-CGTGATCGCGTCATGGGT-3′) (Supplementary Data Sheet ). Resistance genes, virulence genes, and other genetic structures were identified through the center for genomic epidemiology (CGE) website[2]. Sequence alignments were performed using the software Mauve (Darling et al., 2004), and further rounds of PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing were used to fill in the gaps. Complete plasmid sequences were annotated using the online annotation server RAST (Aziz et al., 2008). The plasmid replicons, IS sequences, and AMR genes were identified using the online software PlasmidFinder[3], ISfinder[4], and ResFinder[5], respectively. Sequence comparisons and map generation were performed using BLAST[6] and Easyfig (Sullivan et al., 2011), respectively.

Results

mcr-1 Gene Screening and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

One E. coli strain (termed SH66) was isolated from the fecal sample used in this study, and identified as an ETEC using the DEC PCR detection kit. This strain was subsequently transferred to and preserved in our laboratory, where it was recently screened for the presence of the mcr-1 gene with no prior knowledge of its colistin-resistance characteristic. The screening indicated that this strain harbored an mcr-1 gene. According to medical records, the patient who harbored this strain was not treated with polymyxin antibiotics. The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicate that the ETEC strain identified in this study is resistant to colistin (MIC, 4 μg/ml), ampicillin (>32 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (>32 μg/ml), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (>4 μg/ml), tetracycline (>32 μg/ml), ciprofloxacin (>4 μg/ml), sulfonazo isoxazole (>256 μg/ml), nalidixic acid (>32 μg/ml), streptomycin (>64 μg/ml), and azithromycin (>16 μg/ml), though it was found to be susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (4 μg/ml), ceftriaxone (≤0.25 μg/ml), ceftiofur (0.25 μg/ml), cefoxitin (8 μg/ml), and gentamicin (1 μg/ml) (Table ). According to the classification standards of the WHO (Collignon et al., 2009), SH66 is an MDR strain showing resistance to nine classes of antimicrobials, including aminoglycosides, amphenicols, folate pathway inhibitors, macrolides, penicillins, polymyxins, quinolones, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines. Comparisons of antimicrobial resistance levels between the donor E. coli strain SH66, recipient strain J53 and the J53 transconjugants.

Conjugation Experiments and Southern Blotting

In order to determine the transferability of the mcr-1 gene carried by SH66, conjugation experiments were carried out using the E. coli strain J53 as a recipient, and SH66 as the donor strain. All transconjugants obtained in this experiment tested positive for the mcr-1 gene via PCR amplification and sequencing analysis. The conjugation transfer rate is 1.6 × 10-5. Colistin susceptibility testing showed that the MIC values for the transconjugants (the J53 strains carrying the mcr-1 gene) increased to 4 μg/ml (Table ). This is much higher than the colistin resistance levels of the original J53 strains (which have MIC values of 0.125 μg/ml), and indicates that the transconjugants acquire the same colistin resistance gene as the donor strain. The S1 endonuclease-PFGE and southern blotting analysis revealed that the mcr-1 gene in SH66 was located on a plasmid approximately 60 kb in length (Supplementary Figure ).

Virulence and Resistance Factors Carried by the mcr-1-Harboring ETEC Strain SH66

The DNA of the E. coli strain SH66 identified in this study were subjected to 600-bp paired-end whole genome sequencing with 73.4-fold coverage using the MiSeq sequencer. A total of 1,364,690 reads and 405,565,025 clean bases were generated, which were assembled into 107 contigs with an N50 length of 216,913 bp. Bioinformatics analyses showed that this strain carries the virulence genes eltA, eltB, astA, eilA, lpfA, ltcA, and stb. Additionally, SH66 also carries several resistance genes, namely, blaTEM-1, mphA, ermB, aph(3’)-Ia, aadA5, strA, strB, sul1, sul2, tetA, tetM, floR, catA1, dfrA17, oqxA, and oqxB, along with the mcr-1 gene, all of which could mediate resistance to β-lactams, macrolides, aminoglycosides, sulphonamides, tetracyclines, phenicols, trimethoprim, quinolones, and colistin (Supplementary Table ). The presence of these genes also explains the increase in resistance to several antibiotics observed in the E. coli J53 transconjugants after the conjugation experiment (Table ). Analyses of the gyrA and parC point mutations carried by SH66 also showed that gyrA contained the Ser83→Leu and Asp87→Asn substitutions, along with the parC mutations Ser57→Thr and Ser80→Ile.

Identification and Analysis of the Plasmid Carrying the Novel Variant, mcr-1.9

An mcr-1-carrying plasmid of length 64,005 bp, which we have named pEC26, was identified in SH66 through sequence analysis. Interestingly, the mcr-1 gene identified on this plasmid was found to be a variant of the original mcr-1 due to an SNP (Supplementary Figure ). The SNP was located at position 1036 (where a G→A transition had occurred), which results in the replacement of an aspartic acid residue with an asparagine residue (Asp346→Asn). Since the position of this SNP is different from those of all previously discovered mcr-1 variants, we named this variant mcr-1.9. The sequence analysis shows that there is no resistance gene in addition to mcr-1.9 located in plasmid pEC26. The plasmid pEC26 belongs to the IncI2 group, the same plasmid incompatibility group as pHNSHP45, which was the first plasmid reported to harbor mcr-1 (Liu et al., 2015); pEC26 also harbors 86 predicted open reading frames (ORFs), and has a GC content of 42.55% with a plasmid backbone very similar to that of other IncI2-type plasmids, such as pmcr1-IncI2 (99% identity and 98% coverage, GenBank accession no. KU761326) (Li et al., 2016) and pWF-5-19C (99% identity and 99% coverage, KX505142) (Liu et al., 2017). A comparison of these plasmids and pHNSHP45 (KP347127) (Liu et al., 2015) shows that pEC26, pmcr1-IncI2, and pWF-5-19C contain an IS200 element before the mok gene instead of the IS683 found in pHNSHP45. However, the IS200 element in these plasmids is inserted before a 363 bp fragment that precedes the IS683 element in pHNSHP45 (Figures ). This indicates that although these two IS elements are inserted into the same plasmid backbone, their positions are not the same. Like all the other plasmids mentioned here, pEC26 also contains the 2,607 bp DNA segment that includes the mcr (mcr-1 or mcr-1.9) and pap2 genes, which are integrated downstream of the nikB gene. Besides this, the mcr-1-associated ISApl1 element was not found in the pEC26 plasmid (Figures ). The sequence of pEC26 (Supplementary Data Sheet ) has been deposited with GenBank under the accession number MG946761. Linear comparisons of complete sequences of the IncI2-type plasmids pHNSHP45 (accession no. KP347127), pmcr1_IncI2 (KU761326), pWF-5-19C (KX505142), and pEC26 (MG946761). Colored arrows represent open reading frames, with black, yellow, green, red, and orange arrows representing replication genes, mobile elements, plasmid transfer genes, the mcr-1 gene, and plasmid backbone genes, respectively. Gray shading denotes regions of shared homology amongst the different plasmids. A comparison of the genetic environments of IS683 and IS200 (A), along with mcr-1 and mcr-1.9 (B) in the plasmids pHYEC7-mcr1 (Li et al., 2017), pHNSHP45, pWF-5-19C, pmcr1_Incl1 and pEC26. Gray shading indicates >99% nucleotide identity.

Discussion

This study reports the identification of a novel mcr-1 gene variant, mcr-1.9, which was harbored in an ETEC strain isolated from the diarrheal fecal sample of a 15-month-old male child. We find that the variant mcr-1.9, differs from the mcr-1 gene at position 1036 (where a G→A transition had occurred), which results in the replacement of an aspartic acid residue with an asparagine residue (Asp346→Asn). The MCR-1 protein consists of a transmembrane domain and a soluble catalytic domain. The transmembrane domain is located on the N-terminal, and is composed of residues 1–214, whereas the soluble catalytic domain is located on the C-terminal, and is composed of residues 215–541 (Stojanoski et al., 2016). Therefore, the Asp346→Asn change detected in mcr-1.9 is located in the catalytic domain. Since four of the known mcr-1 gene variants, mcr-1.4–1.7, also contain point mutations in the catalytic domain (Table ), it appears that this domain has a higher mutation rate than the transmembrane domain. However, although the currently identified mutations in the mcr-1 gene have so far not showed obvious increases in colistin resistance, the presence of two or more point mutations in AMR genes can occasionally lead to changes in the strength of resistance imparted by the gene, such as the resistance increase to fluoroquinolones by the additional mutations in the gyrA and/or parC genes (Vila et al., 1994; Ruiz et al., 2002). Apart from mutations causing heightened resistance to known antimicrobials, another concern regarding resistance genes is their spread through bacterial populations via horizontal transfer. The occurrence of the mcr-1 variant mcr-1.9 in an ETEC strain isolated from a human fecal sample is a cause of much concern; as the human intestine contains a complex collection of microflora where the incidence of horizontal gene transfer can occur at a high rate, the spread of this gene can cause widespread resistance to colistin. Added to this, several studies have shown that the mcr-1 gene can be ubiquitously disseminated in the Enterobacteriaceae (Du et al., 2016; Malhotra-Kumar et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2016). Furthermore, the mcr-1 gene is usually associated with the highly active transposon element ISApl1 that can occur either on one, or both sides of the gene (Li et al., 2017; Snesrud et al., 2017) (Figure ). The presence of ISApl1 could further enhance the probability of this gene being transferred horizontally; in vitro mobilization assays have already proved that the mcr-1 gene can be mobilized by ISApl1-mediated transposition (Poirel et al., 2017). Moreover, the transfer of mcr-1 via ISApl1-mediated transposition has been shown to generate mutations, leading to the formation of new mcr-1 gene variants (Poirel et al., 2017). We therefore hypothesize that mcr-1.9 and perhaps other variants of mcr-1 may have been generated during horizontal transfer events involving transposable elements. The first reported mcr-1 gene was identified in an IncI2 plasmid (Liu et al., 2015). As of now, the mcr-1 gene and its variants have been reported in various plasmid backbones, including the IncI2, IncHI2, IncF, IncP, IncFIP, and IncX4 (Liu et al., 2015; Doumith et al., 2016; Falgenhauer et al., 2016; Nordmann et al., 2016), all of which are known to be vehicles disseminating antibiotic resistance genes among the Enterobacteriaceae. The mcr-1.9 gene identified by us was found on an IncI2-type plasmid, which has a broad host range (Lv et al., 2013). Furthermore, three [mcr-1.3 (KU934208), mcr-1.5 (KY471308), and mcr-1.7 (KY829117)] of the six mcr-1 variants [mcr-1.8 (KY683842) has no description of plasmid type] previously discovered are located on IncI2-type plasmids. Besides this, the plasmid most similar to pEC26 is pWF-5-19C (KX505142), which is found in Cronobacter sakazakii isolated from chicken (Liu et al., 2017). Based on this information, we speculate that pEC26 and plasmids similar to it have a strong ability to facilitate horizontal transfer of the mcr-1 gene, and that this gene may have a higher mutation rate when carried by IncI2-type plasmids than when they are present in other plasmid types. However, since only a few such instances have been identified so far, this hypothesis needs much further study for verification and confirmation. Besides harboring the novel mcr-1 gene variant, mcr-1.9, the ETEC that we have isolated and described in this study was found to carry various virulence genes, namely, heat-stable enterotoxin (estA), heat-labile enterotoxin (eltB), EAST1 (enteroaggregative E. coli heat-stable toxin 1) gene (astA), adherence related gene (eilA), long polar fimbriae (lpfA), heat-labile enterotoxin A subunit (ltcA), and heat-stale enterotoxin II (stb). The strain was also found to carry several antimicrobial-resistance genes and shows MDR to at least nine classes of antibiotics (Table ). These results indicate that this strain, called SH66, probably has high AMR and pathogenicity. Since mcr-1 variants have begun to appear in human intestinal bacteria, especially in diarrheal E. coli strains, it is very possible that the spread of this gene in human intestinal microflora may cause issues in the effective treatment of diarrheal conditions induced by bacterial infections. Overall, our findings highlight the possibility of a widespread dissemination of mcr-1 gene variants, along with various virulence factors and resistance genes in the bacterial flora of the human intestine. Therefore, we believe that it is of utmost importance to track and identify mutations in the mcr-1 gene, and to control its transmission. We also believe that the judicious use of antibiotics by physicians is crucial to reduce the rate of emergence of MDR bacterial strains.

Author Contributions

HS, YS, and CY designed the experiments. HL and BZ performed the experiments. SQ, YX, LJ, and BL analyzed the data. PL, YL, and LY prepared the tables and figures. CY, YX, JX, and LW prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Table 1

List of currently known mcr-1 gene variants and mcr-2.

VariantsAccession numbersNucleotide mutationsAmino acid variationsHost strainSourceCountryReference
mcr-1KP347127E. coliPigChinaLiu et al., 2015
mcr-2LT598652E. coliCalvesBelgiumXavier et al., 2016
mcr-1.2KX236309A8TQ3LK. pneumoniaeHuman rectal swabItalyDi Pilato et al., 2016
mcr-1.3KU934208A111G, A112GI38VE. coliChickenChinaYang et al., 2017
mcr-1.4KY041856G1318TD439NE. coliSewageChinaZhao et al., 2017b
mcr-1.5KY283125C1354TH452YE. coliHuman urineArgentinaTijet et al., 2017
mcr-1.6KY352406A1263G, A1607GT215A, R536HS. TyphimuriumHuman rectal swabChinaLu et al., 2017
mcr-1.7KY488488G643AA215TE. coliSewageChinaZhao et al., 2017b
mcr-1.8KY683842A8GQ3RE. coliBrunei
mcr-1.9MG946761G1036AD346NE. coliHuman fecalChinaThis study
Table 2

Comparisons of antimicrobial resistance levels between the donor E. coli strain SH66, recipient strain J53 and the J53 transconjugants.

Antimicrobial classAntimicrobialDonor strain SH66
Transconjugants J53
Recipient strain J53
SusceptibilityMICsSusceptibilityMICsSusceptibilityMICs
PolymyxinsPolymyxinB/ColistinR4R4S0.125
AminoglycosidesGentamicinS1S≤0.25S≤0.25
StreptomycinR>64R>64S≤2
AmphenicolsChloramphenicolR>32R>32S≤8
CephalosporinsCeftriaxoneS≤0.25S≤0.25S≤0.25
CeftiofurS0.25S≤0.5S≤0.5
CephamycinsCefoxitinS8S≤8S≤8
Folate pathway inhibitorsTRI/SULR>4R>4S≤2
MacrolidesAzithromycinR>16R>16S≤4
PenicillinsAMO/CLAS4S≤4S≤4
AmpicillinR>32R>32S≤8
QuinolonesCiprofloxacinR>4S≤0.015S≤0.015
Nalidixic acidR>32S≤4S≤4
SulfonamidesSulfisoxazoleR>256R>256S≤16
TetracyclinesTetracyclineR>32R>32S≤4
  42 in total

1.  Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr-2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, June 2016.

Authors:  Basil Britto Xavier; Christine Lammens; Rohit Ruhal; Samir Kumar-Singh; Patrick Butaye; Herman Goossens; Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016-07-07

2.  Characterisation of the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in Escherichia coli isolated from animals in Egypt.

Authors:  Hazim O Khalifa; Ashraf M Ahmed; Atef F Oreiby; Amal M Eid; Toshi Shimamoto; Tadashi Shimamoto
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  Co-occurrence of mcr-1 and ESBL on a single plasmid in Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  Yong-Qiang Yang; An-Yun Zhang; Su-Zhen Ma; Ling-Han Kong; Yun-Xia Li; Jin-Xin Liu; Margaret A Davis; Xin-Yi Guo; Bi-Hui Liu; Chang-Wei Lei; Hong-Ning Wang
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Emergence of Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-1 in Cronobacter sakazakii Producing NDM-9 and in Escherichia coli from the Same Animal.

Authors:  Bao-Tao Liu; Feng-Jing Song; Ming Zou; Zhi-Hui Hao; Hu Shan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Enterotoxins, colonization factors, serotypes and antimicrobial resistance of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) strains isolated from hospitalized children with diarrhea in Bolivia.

Authors:  Claudia Rodas; Rosalía Mamani; Jorge Blanco; Jesus Eulogio Blanco; Gudrun Wiklund; Ann-Mari Svennerholm; Asa Sjöling; Volga Iniguez
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.949

Review 6.  Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in developing countries: epidemiology, microbiology, clinical features, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Firdausi Qadri; Ann-Mari Svennerholm; A S G Faruque; R Bradley Sack
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Complete Sequences of mcr-1-Harboring Plasmids from Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase- and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Aiqing Li; Yong Yang; Minhui Miao; Kalyan D Chavda; José R Mediavilla; Xiaofang Xie; Ping Feng; Yi-Wei Tang; Barry N Kreiswirth; Liang Chen; Hong Du
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  World Health Organization ranking of antimicrobials according to their importance in human medicine: A critical step for developing risk management strategies for the use of antimicrobials in food production animals.

Authors:  Peter Collignon; John H Powers; Tom M Chiller; Awa Aidara-Kane; Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Association between double mutation in gyrA gene of ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and MICs.

Authors:  J Vila; J Ruiz; F Marco; A Barcelo; P Goñi; E Giralt; T Jimenez de Anta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Structure of the catalytic domain of the colistin resistance enzyme MCR-1.

Authors:  Vlatko Stojanoski; Banumathi Sankaran; B V Venkataram Prasad; Laurent Poirel; Patrice Nordmann; Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 7.431

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genetic Characterization of mcr-1-Positive Multidrug-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium Isolated From Intestinal Infection in Children and Pork Offal in China.

Authors:  Haoran Zhang; Ying Xiang; Yong Huang; Beibei Liang; Xuebin Xu; Jing Xie; Xinying Du; Chaojie Yang; Hongbo Liu; Hongbo Liu; Hui Wang; Mingjuan Yang; Ligui Wang; Xiaofeng Hu; Lianqun Jin; Jinsong Li; Yongqiang Jiang; Shaofu Qiu; Hongbin Song
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Colistin-resistant Enterobacterales among veterinary healthcare workers and in the Dutch population.

Authors:  C M Dierikx; A P Meijs; P D Hengeveld; F R M van der Klis; J van Vliet; E F Gijsbers; M Rozwandowicz; A H A M van Hoek; A P A Hendrickx; J Hordijk; E Van Duijkeren
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 3.  Worldwide Prevalence of mcr-mediated Colistin-Resistance Escherichia coli in Isolates of Clinical Samples, Healthy Humans, and Livestock-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Bastidas-Caldes; Jacobus H de Waard; María Soledad Salgado; María José Villacís; Marco Coral-Almeida; Yoshimasa Yamamoto; Manuel Calvopiña
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant ESKAPEE pathogens from clinical samples in Chonburi, Thailand (2017-2018).

Authors:  Sirigade Ruekit; Apichai Srijan; Oralak Serichantalergs; Katie R Margulieux; Patrick Mc Gann; Emma G Mills; William C Stribling; Theerasak Pimsawat; Rosarin Kormanee; Suthisak Nakornchai; Chaiwat Sakdinava; Prawet Sukhchat; Mariusz Wojnarski; Samandra T Demons; John M Crawford; Paphavee Lertsethtakarn; Brett E Swierczewski
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  Molecular Detection of Colistin Resistance mcr-1 Gene in Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from Chicken.

Authors:  Md Bashir Uddin; Mohammad Nurul Alam; Mahmudul Hasan; S M Bayejed Hossain; Mita Debnath; Ruhena Begum; Mohammed A Samad; Syeda Farjana Hoque; Md Shahidur Rahman Chowdhury; Md Mahfujur Rahman; Md Mukter Hossain; Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan; Åke Lundkvist; Josef D Järhult; Mohamed E El Zowalaty; Syed Sayeem Uddin Ahmed
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.