| Literature DB >> 29921279 |
Ling-Bing Meng1, Ruomei Qi2, Lei Xu1, Yuhui Chen1, Zemou Yu3, Peng Guo4, Tao Gong5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mortality of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease is on the rise, and changes in intimal and media thickness are a leading cause of cerebral ischemia-related death. Levels of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), total cholesterol (TC), and chronic stress (CS) are all recognized risk factors for atherosclerosis (AS). However, the leading independent risk factor is indistinct. This study explored the effects of chronic stress, LDLC, and TC on AS and intimal and media thickness, preliminarily explored the main risk factor of AS, and analyzed the related histocyte mechanisms for macrophages and endothelial cells.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Cerebrovascular disease; Chronic stress; Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; Total cholesterol; Vascular intimal thickness; Vascular media thickness
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29921279 PMCID: PMC6009046 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-018-0795-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Clinicopathological variables and the status of intimal and media thickness
| Characteristics | Intimal thickness |
| Media thickness |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (%) | High (%) | Low (%) | High (%) | |||||
| Sex | Female | 19 | 8 (21.6%) | 11 (29.7%) | 0.842 | 13 (35.1%) | 6 (16.2%) | 0.642 |
| Male | 18 | 7 (18.9%) | 11 (29.7%) | 11 (29.7%) | 7 (18.9%) | |||
| Condition* | normal | 11 | 11 (29.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | < 0.001 | 11 (29.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | < 0.001 |
| HF | 13 | 4 (10.8%) | 9 (24.3%) | 10 (27.0%) | 3 (8.1%) | |||
| HF + CS | 13 | 0 (0.0%) | 13 (35.1%) | 3 (8.1%) | 10 (27.0%) | |||
| AST* | Low | 19 | 12 (32.4%) | 7 (18.9%) | 0.004 | 13 (35.1%) | 6 (16.2%) | 0.642 |
| High | 18 | 3 (8.1%) | 15 (40.5%) | 11 (29.7%) | 7 (18.9%) | |||
| LDLC* | Low | 13 | 11 (29.7%) | 2 (5.4%) | < 0.001 | 12 (32.4%) | 1 (2.7%) | 0.010 |
| High | 24 | 4 (10.8%) | 20 (54.1%) | 12 (32.4%) | 12 (32.4%) | |||
| TC* | Low | 12 | 11 (29.7%) | 1 (2.7%) | < 0.001 | 11 (29.7%) | 1 (2.7%) | 0.018 |
| High | 25 | 4 (10.8%) | 21 (56.8%) | 13 (35.1%) | 12 (32.4%) | |||
| TG | Low | 25 | 12 (32.4%) | 13 (35.1%) | 0.182 | 17 (45.9%) | 8 (21.6%) | 0.564 |
| High | 12 | 3 (8.1%) | 9 (24.3%) | 7 (18.9%) | 5 (13.5%) | |||
Pearson’s chi-squared test was used. *P < 0.05
Fig. 3The observation of abdominal aortae by staining assay between the different conditions. a HE staining (4×,10×,20×,40×); b Immunohistochemical staining by the RAM11 marker to observe the macrophagocytes (4×,10×,20×,40×); c Immunohistochemical staining by the CD31 marker to observe the vascular endothelial cells. HF: high-fat diet; HF + CS: high-fat diet plus chronic stress
The corelationship of the expression between intimal and media thickness
| Characteristics | Media thickness | p(spearman) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (%) | High (%) | ||||
| Intimal thickness * | Low | 15 | 14 (37.8%) | 1 (2.7%) | 0.003* |
| High | 22 | 10 (27.0%) | 12 (32.4%) | ||
| 37 | 24 | 13 | |||
Spearman-rho test was used. *P < 0.05
Correlative characteristics’ effect on NDT based on univariate Cox proportional regression analysis
| Characteristics | NDT | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P | |||
| Sex | Female | 19 | 1 | 0.791 | |
| Male | 18 | 0.901 | 0.416–1.951 | ||
| Condition | normal | 11 | 1 | 0.036 | |
| HF | 13 | 4.138 | 1.149–14.899 | ||
| HF + CS | 13 | 3.561 | 0.990–12.808 | ||
| AST | Low | 19 | 1 | 0.023 | |
| High | 18 | 2.657 | 1.148–6.154 | ||
| LDLC | Low | 13 | 1 | 0.041 | |
| High | 24 | 2.778 | 1.044–7.396 | ||
| TC | Low | 12 | 1 | 0.030 | |
| High | 25 | 3.261 | 1.118–9.512 | ||
| TG | Low | 25 | 1 | 0.116 | |
| High | 12 | 1.896 | 0.854–4.208 | ||
NDT Non-depression time, HR hazard ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval. * P < 0.05
Associations between intimal (and media) thickness and subjects’ characteristics
| Characteristics | Intimal thickness | Media thickness | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient coefficient | Multiple linear regression | Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient | Multiple linear regression | |||||||
| ρa | βb | VIF | ρa | βb | VIF | |||||
| Sex | 0.077 | 0.653 | −0.012 | 0.927 | 1.145 | 0.026 | 0.877 | −0.039 | 0.089 | 1.145 |
| Condition | 0.658 | < 0.001* | 0.632 | < 0.001* | 4.355 | 0.747 | < 0.001* | 0.083 | 0.004* | 4.355 |
| AST | 0.242 | 0.149 | −0.011 | 0.127 | 1.685 | 0.436 | 0.007* | 0.001 | 0.781 | 1.685 |
| LDLC | 0.488 | 0.002* | − 0.040 | 0.288 | 29.772 | 0.552 | < 0.001* | − 0.002 | 0.778 | 29.772 |
| TC | 0.498 | 0.002* | 0.011 | 0.510 | 24.568 | 0.446 | 0.006* | − 0.001 | 0.788 | 24.568 |
| TG | 0.080 | 0.640 | 0.238 | 0.127 | 1.683 | 0.243 | 0.147 | 0.069 | 0.013* | 1.683 |
Condition: normal; High fat diet; High fat diet plus chronic stress
AST glutamic oxalacetic transaminase, LDLC Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, VIF variance inflation factor
aSpearman’s rank correlation coefficient between intimal (and media) thickness and each variable; ρ: Spearman’s correlation coefficient
bMultiple linear regression analysis, β: parameter estimate;
*Significant variables
Fig. 1ROC curve of the predictive value of condition (normal, high-fat diet, or high-fat diet plus chronic stress) for intimal (and media) thickness. Increasing the degree of condition was predictive of intimal (and media) thickness. For the ROC curve between condition and intimal thickness, the area under the curve (AUC1) = 0.875; 95% confidence interval, 0.761–0.989; p < 0.001. For the ROC curve between condition and media thickness, the area under the curve (AUC2) = 0.906; 95% confidence interval, 0.805–1.000; p < 0.001
Fig. 2Comparative intimal (and media) thickness geometric means between the different conditions. HF: high-fat diet; HF + CS: high-fat diet plus chronic stress. *P < 0.05