Literature DB >> 29916991

Risk Factors for Early Reoperation After Operative Treatment of Acetabular Fractures.

Anthony Ding1, Robert V OʼToole1, Renan Castillo2, Brad Reahl1, Ryan Montalvo1, Jason W Nascone1, Marcus F Sciadini1, Anthony R Carlini3, Theodore T Manson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the risk factors for early reoperation after operative fixation of acetabular fractures.
DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation.
SETTING: Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS: Seven hundred ninety-one patients with displaced acetabular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) from 2006 to 2015. Average follow-up was 52 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Early reoperation after acetabular ORIF, defined as secondary procedure for infection or revision within 3 years of initial operation.
RESULTS: Fifty-six (7%) patients underwent irrigation and debridement for infection and wound complications. Four associated risk factors identified were length of stay in the intensive care unit, pelvic embolization, operative time, and time delay between injury and surgical fixation. Sixty-two (8%) patients underwent early revision, including 45 conversions to total hip arthroplasty, 10 revision ORIF, 6 fixation device removals because of concern for joint penetration (2 acutely and 4 > 6 months after surgery), and 1 stabilization procedure. Three risk factors associated with early revision were hip dislocation, articular comminution, and concomitant femoral head or neck injury. Combined injuries to the pelvic ring and acetabulum, fracture pattern, marginal impaction, and body mass index had no significant effect on early revision surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for early reoperation after operative fixation of acetabular fractures differed based on the reason for return to the operating room. Infection was more likely to occur in patients who had prolonged stays in the intensive care unit, had prolonged operative times, were embolized, or experienced delay in time to fixation. Revision was more likely with hip dislocation, articular comminution, femoral head or neck fracture, and advancing age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29916991     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  5 in total

1.  A retrospective comparison of the conventional versus three-dimensional printed model-assisted surgery in the treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Anıl Murat Öztürk; Onur Süer; Suzan Şirintürk; Kemal Aktuğlu; Figen Govsa; Mehmet Asım Özer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.511

2.  Complications after surgical treatment of acetabular fractures: a 5-year follow-up of 229 patients.

Authors:  Natalie Lundin; Hans E Berg; Anders Enocson
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-05-20

3.  Solutions for failed osteosynthesis of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Christopher Spering; Katharina Jäckle; Mehool R Acharya
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-09-28

4.  Is Obesity Associated With an Increased Risk of Complications After Surgical Management of Acetabulum and Pelvis Fractures? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter N Mittwede; Christopher M Gibbs; Jaimo Ahn; Patrick F Bergin; Ivan S Tarkin
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-04-19

5.  Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection after Operative Fixation of Acetabular Fractures: Is Psoas Density a Useful Metric?

Authors:  Kyle H Cichos; Khalid H Mahmoud; Clay A Spitler; Ahmed M Kamel Abdel Aal; Sarah Osman; Gerald McGwin; Elie S Ghanem
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.755

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.